小程序初始化

This commit is contained in:
2026-02-27 11:32:50 +08:00
parent 93574dbb45
commit 97e1ea2706
252 changed files with 32427 additions and 12363 deletions
+184
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
---
description: Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/speckit.tasks` has successfully produced a complete `tasks.md`.
## Operating Constraints
**STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is **non-negotiable** within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside `/speckit.analyze`.
## Execution Steps
### 1. Initialize Analysis Context
Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command).
For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
**From spec.md:**
- Overview/Context
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
- User Stories
- Edge Cases (if present)
**From plan.md:**
- Architecture/stack choices
- Data Model references
- Phases
- Technical constraints
**From tasks.md:**
- Task IDs
- Descriptions
- Phase grouping
- Parallel markers [P]
- Referenced file paths
**From constitution:**
- Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for principle validation
### 3. Build Semantic Models
Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
- **Requirements inventory**: Each functional + non-functional requirement with a stable key (derive slug based on imperative phrase; e.g., "User can upload file" → `user-can-upload-file`)
- **User story/action inventory**: Discrete user actions with acceptance criteria
- **Task coverage mapping**: Map each task to one or more requirements or stories (inference by keyword / explicit reference patterns like IDs or key phrases)
- **Constitution rule set**: Extract principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
### 4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
#### A. Duplication Detection
- Identify near-duplicate requirements
- Mark lower-quality phrasing for consolidation
#### B. Ambiguity Detection
- Flag vague adjectives (fast, scalable, secure, intuitive, robust) lacking measurable criteria
- Flag unresolved placeholders (TODO, TKTK, ???, `<placeholder>`, etc.)
#### C. Underspecification
- Requirements with verbs but missing object or measurable outcome
- User stories missing acceptance criteria alignment
- Tasks referencing files or components not defined in spec/plan
#### D. Constitution Alignment
- Any requirement or plan element conflicting with a MUST principle
- Missing mandated sections or quality gates from constitution
#### E. Coverage Gaps
- Requirements with zero associated tasks
- Tasks with no mapped requirement/story
- Non-functional requirements not reflected in tasks (e.g., performance, security)
#### F. Inconsistency
- Terminology drift (same concept named differently across files)
- Data entities referenced in plan but absent in spec (or vice versa)
- Task ordering contradictions (e.g., integration tasks before foundational setup tasks without dependency note)
- Conflicting requirements (e.g., one requires Next.js while other specifies Vue)
### 5. Severity Assignment
Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
- **CRITICAL**: Violates constitution MUST, missing core spec artifact, or requirement with zero coverage that blocks baseline functionality
- **HIGH**: Duplicate or conflicting requirement, ambiguous security/performance attribute, untestable acceptance criterion
- **MEDIUM**: Terminology drift, missing non-functional task coverage, underspecified edge case
- **LOW**: Style/wording improvements, minor redundancy not affecting execution order
### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
## Specification Analysis Report
| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| A1 | Duplication | HIGH | spec.md:L120-134 | Two similar requirements ... | Merge phrasing; keep clearer version |
(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by category initial.)
**Coverage Summary Table:**
| Requirement Key | Has Task? | Task IDs | Notes |
|-----------------|-----------|----------|-------|
**Constitution Alignment Issues:** (if any)
**Unmapped Tasks:** (if any)
**Metrics:**
- Total Requirements
- Total Tasks
- Coverage % (requirements with >=1 task)
- Ambiguity Count
- Duplication Count
- Critical Issues Count
### 7. Provide Next Actions
At end of report, output a concise Next Actions block:
- If CRITICAL issues exist: Recommend resolving before `/speckit.implement`
- If only LOW/MEDIUM: User may proceed, but provide improvement suggestions
- Provide explicit command suggestions: e.g., "Run /speckit.specify with refinement", "Run /speckit.plan to adjust architecture", "Manually edit tasks.md to add coverage for 'performance-metrics'"
### 8. Offer Remediation
Ask the user: "Would you like me to suggest concrete remediation edits for the top N issues?" (Do NOT apply them automatically.)
## Operating Principles
### Context Efficiency
- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings, not exhaustive documentation
- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally; don't dump all content into analysis
- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes should produce consistent IDs and counts
### Analysis Guidelines
- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
- **Prioritize constitution violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances, not generic patterns)
- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
## Context
$ARGUMENTS
+294
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
---
description: Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
---
## Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"
**CRITICAL CONCEPT**: Checklists are **UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING** - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
**NOT for verification/testing**:
- ❌ NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
- ❌ NOT "Test error handling works"
- ❌ NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
- ❌ NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec
**FOR requirements quality validation**:
- ✅ "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
- ✅ "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
- ✅ "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
- ✅ "Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
- ✅ "Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)
**Metaphor**: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Execution Steps
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list.
- All file paths must be absolute.
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Clarify intent (dynamic)**: Derive up to THREE initial contextual clarifying questions (no pre-baked catalog). They MUST:
- Be generated from the user's phrasing + extracted signals from spec/plan/tasks
- Only ask about information that materially changes checklist content
- Be skipped individually if already unambiguous in `$ARGUMENTS`
- Prefer precision over breadth
Generation algorithm:
1. Extract signals: feature domain keywords (e.g., auth, latency, UX, API), risk indicators ("critical", "must", "compliance"), stakeholder hints ("QA", "review", "security team"), and explicit deliverables ("a11y", "rollback", "contracts").
2. Cluster signals into candidate focus areas (max 4) ranked by relevance.
3. Identify probable audience & timing (author, reviewer, QA, release) if not explicit.
4. Detect missing dimensions: scope breadth, depth/rigor, risk emphasis, exclusion boundaries, measurable acceptance criteria.
5. Formulate questions chosen from these archetypes:
- Scope refinement (e.g., "Should this include integration touchpoints with X and Y or stay limited to local module correctness?")
- Risk prioritization (e.g., "Which of these potential risk areas should receive mandatory gating checks?")
- Depth calibration (e.g., "Is this a lightweight pre-commit sanity list or a formal release gate?")
- Audience framing (e.g., "Will this be used by the author only or peers during PR review?")
- Boundary exclusion (e.g., "Should we explicitly exclude performance tuning items this round?")
- Scenario class gap (e.g., "No recovery flows detected—are rollback / partial failure paths in scope?")
Question formatting rules:
- If presenting options, generate a compact table with columns: Option | Candidate | Why It Matters
- Limit to AE options maximum; omit table if a free-form answer is clearer
- Never ask the user to restate what they already said
- Avoid speculative categories (no hallucination). If uncertain, ask explicitly: "Confirm whether X belongs in scope."
Defaults when interaction impossible:
- Depth: Standard
- Audience: Reviewer (PR) if code-related; Author otherwise
- Focus: Top 2 relevance clusters
Output the questions (label Q1/Q2/Q3). After answers: if ≥2 scenario classes (Alternate / Exception / Recovery / Non-Functional domain) remain unclear, you MAY ask up to TWO more targeted followups (Q4/Q5) with a one-line justification each (e.g., "Unresolved recovery path risk"). Do not exceed five total questions. Skip escalation if user explicitly declines more.
3. **Understand user request**: Combine `$ARGUMENTS` + clarifying answers:
- Derive checklist theme (e.g., security, review, deploy, ux)
- Consolidate explicit must-have items mentioned by user
- Map focus selections to category scaffolding
- Infer any missing context from spec/plan/tasks (do NOT hallucinate)
4. **Load feature context**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- spec.md: Feature requirements and scope
- plan.md (if exists): Technical details, dependencies
- tasks.md (if exists): Implementation tasks
**Context Loading Strategy**:
- Load only necessary portions relevant to active focus areas (avoid full-file dumping)
- Prefer summarizing long sections into concise scenario/requirement bullets
- Use progressive disclosure: add follow-on retrieval only if gaps detected
- If source docs are large, generate interim summary items instead of embedding raw text
5. **Generate checklist** - Create "Unit Tests for Requirements":
- Create `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/` directory if it doesn't exist
- Generate unique checklist filename:
- Use short, descriptive name based on domain (e.g., `ux.md`, `api.md`, `security.md`)
- Format: `[domain].md`
- If file exists, append to existing file
- Number items sequentially starting from CHK001
- Each `/speckit.checklist` run creates a NEW file (never overwrites existing checklists)
**CORE PRINCIPLE - Test the Requirements, Not the Implementation**:
Every checklist item MUST evaluate the REQUIREMENTS THEMSELVES for:
- **Completeness**: Are all necessary requirements present?
- **Clarity**: Are requirements unambiguous and specific?
- **Consistency**: Do requirements align with each other?
- **Measurability**: Can requirements be objectively verified?
- **Coverage**: Are all scenarios/edge cases addressed?
**Category Structure** - Group items by requirement quality dimensions:
- **Requirement Completeness** (Are all necessary requirements documented?)
- **Requirement Clarity** (Are requirements specific and unambiguous?)
- **Requirement Consistency** (Do requirements align without conflicts?)
- **Acceptance Criteria Quality** (Are success criteria measurable?)
- **Scenario Coverage** (Are all flows/cases addressed?)
- **Edge Case Coverage** (Are boundary conditions defined?)
- **Non-Functional Requirements** (Performance, Security, Accessibility, etc. - are they specified?)
- **Dependencies & Assumptions** (Are they documented and validated?)
- **Ambiguities & Conflicts** (What needs clarification?)
**HOW TO WRITE CHECKLIST ITEMS - "Unit Tests for English"**:
**WRONG** (Testing implementation):
- "Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards"
- "Test hover states work on desktop"
- "Confirm logo click navigates home"
**CORRECT** (Testing requirements quality):
- "Are the exact number and layout of featured episodes specified?" [Completeness]
- "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" [Clarity]
- "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" [Consistency]
- "Are keyboard navigation requirements defined for all interactive UI?" [Coverage]
- "Is the fallback behavior specified when logo image fails to load?" [Edge Cases]
- "Are loading states defined for asynchronous episode data?" [Completeness]
- "Does the spec define visual hierarchy for competing UI elements?" [Clarity]
**ITEM STRUCTURE**:
Each item should follow this pattern:
- Question format asking about requirement quality
- Focus on what's WRITTEN (or not written) in the spec/plan
- Include quality dimension in brackets [Completeness/Clarity/Consistency/etc.]
- Reference spec section `[Spec §X.Y]` when checking existing requirements
- Use `[Gap]` marker when checking for missing requirements
**EXAMPLES BY QUALITY DIMENSION**:
Completeness:
- "Are error handling requirements defined for all API failure modes? [Gap]"
- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Completeness]"
- "Are mobile breakpoint requirements defined for responsive layouts? [Gap]"
Clarity:
- "Is 'fast loading' quantified with specific timing thresholds? [Clarity, Spec §NFR-2]"
- "Are 'related episodes' selection criteria explicitly defined? [Clarity, Spec §FR-5]"
- "Is 'prominent' defined with measurable visual properties? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-4]"
Consistency:
- "Do navigation requirements align across all pages? [Consistency, Spec §FR-10]"
- "Are card component requirements consistent between landing and detail pages? [Consistency]"
Coverage:
- "Are requirements defined for zero-state scenarios (no episodes)? [Coverage, Edge Case]"
- "Are concurrent user interaction scenarios addressed? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Are requirements specified for partial data loading failures? [Coverage, Exception Flow]"
Measurability:
- "Are visual hierarchy requirements measurable/testable? [Acceptance Criteria, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Can 'balanced visual weight' be objectively verified? [Measurability, Spec §FR-2]"
**Scenario Classification & Coverage** (Requirements Quality Focus):
- Check if requirements exist for: Primary, Alternate, Exception/Error, Recovery, Non-Functional scenarios
- For each scenario class, ask: "Are [scenario type] requirements complete, clear, and consistent?"
- If scenario class missing: "Are [scenario type] requirements intentionally excluded or missing? [Gap]"
- Include resilience/rollback when state mutation occurs: "Are rollback requirements defined for migration failures? [Gap]"
**Traceability Requirements**:
- MINIMUM: ≥80% of items MUST include at least one traceability reference
- Each item should reference: spec section `[Spec §X.Y]`, or use markers: `[Gap]`, `[Ambiguity]`, `[Conflict]`, `[Assumption]`
- If no ID system exists: "Is a requirement & acceptance criteria ID scheme established? [Traceability]"
**Surface & Resolve Issues** (Requirements Quality Problems):
Ask questions about the requirements themselves:
- Ambiguities: "Is the term 'fast' quantified with specific metrics? [Ambiguity, Spec §NFR-1]"
- Conflicts: "Do navigation requirements conflict between §FR-10 and §FR-10a? [Conflict]"
- Assumptions: "Is the assumption of 'always available podcast API' validated? [Assumption]"
- Dependencies: "Are external podcast API requirements documented? [Dependency, Gap]"
- Missing definitions: "Is 'visual hierarchy' defined with measurable criteria? [Gap]"
**Content Consolidation**:
- Soft cap: If raw candidate items > 40, prioritize by risk/impact
- Merge near-duplicates checking the same requirement aspect
- If >5 low-impact edge cases, create one item: "Are edge cases X, Y, Z addressed in requirements? [Coverage]"
**🚫 ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED** - These make it an implementation test, not a requirements test:
- ❌ Any item starting with "Verify", "Test", "Confirm", "Check" + implementation behavior
- ❌ References to code execution, user actions, system behavior
- ❌ "Displays correctly", "works properly", "functions as expected"
- ❌ "Click", "navigate", "render", "load", "execute"
- ❌ Test cases, test plans, QA procedures
- ❌ Implementation details (frameworks, APIs, algorithms)
**✅ REQUIRED PATTERNS** - These test requirements quality:
- ✅ "Are [requirement type] defined/specified/documented for [scenario]?"
- ✅ "Is [vague term] quantified/clarified with specific criteria?"
- ✅ "Are requirements consistent between [section A] and [section B]?"
- ✅ "Can [requirement] be objectively measured/verified?"
- ✅ "Are [edge cases/scenarios] addressed in requirements?"
- ✅ "Does the spec define [missing aspect]?"
6. **Structure Reference**: Generate the checklist following the canonical template in `.specify/templates/checklist-template.md` for title, meta section, category headings, and ID formatting. If template is unavailable, use: H1 title, purpose/created meta lines, `##` category sections containing `- [ ] CHK### <requirement item>` lines with globally incrementing IDs starting at CHK001.
7. **Report**: Output full path to created checklist, item count, and remind user that each run creates a new file. Summarize:
- Focus areas selected
- Depth level
- Actor/timing
- Any explicit user-specified must-have items incorporated
**Important**: Each `/speckit.checklist` command invocation creates a checklist file using short, descriptive names unless file already exists. This allows:
- Multiple checklists of different types (e.g., `ux.md`, `test.md`, `security.md`)
- Simple, memorable filenames that indicate checklist purpose
- Easy identification and navigation in the `checklists/` folder
To avoid clutter, use descriptive types and clean up obsolete checklists when done.
## Example Checklist Types & Sample Items
**UX Requirements Quality:** `ux.md`
Sample items (testing the requirements, NOT the implementation):
- "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined with measurable criteria? [Clarity, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Is the number and positioning of UI elements explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Are interaction state requirements (hover, focus, active) consistently defined? [Consistency]"
- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Is fallback behavior defined when images fail to load? [Edge Case, Gap]"
- "Can 'prominent display' be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-4]"
**API Requirements Quality:** `api.md`
Sample items:
- "Are error response formats specified for all failure scenarios? [Completeness]"
- "Are rate limiting requirements quantified with specific thresholds? [Clarity]"
- "Are authentication requirements consistent across all endpoints? [Consistency]"
- "Are retry/timeout requirements defined for external dependencies? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Is versioning strategy documented in requirements? [Gap]"
**Performance Requirements Quality:** `performance.md`
Sample items:
- "Are performance requirements quantified with specific metrics? [Clarity]"
- "Are performance targets defined for all critical user journeys? [Coverage]"
- "Are performance requirements under different load conditions specified? [Completeness]"
- "Can performance requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability]"
- "Are degradation requirements defined for high-load scenarios? [Edge Case, Gap]"
**Security Requirements Quality:** `security.md`
Sample items:
- "Are authentication requirements specified for all protected resources? [Coverage]"
- "Are data protection requirements defined for sensitive information? [Completeness]"
- "Is the threat model documented and requirements aligned to it? [Traceability]"
- "Are security requirements consistent with compliance obligations? [Consistency]"
- "Are security failure/breach response requirements defined? [Gap, Exception Flow]"
## Anti-Examples: What NOT To Do
**❌ WRONG - These test implementation, not requirements:**
```markdown
- [ ] CHK001 - Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards [Spec §FR-001]
- [ ] CHK002 - Test hover states work correctly on desktop [Spec §FR-003]
- [ ] CHK003 - Confirm logo click navigates to home page [Spec §FR-010]
- [ ] CHK004 - Check that related episodes section shows 3-5 items [Spec §FR-005]
```
**✅ CORRECT - These test requirements quality:**
```markdown
- [ ] CHK001 - Are the number and layout of featured episodes explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-001]
- [ ] CHK002 - Are hover state requirements consistently defined for all interactive elements? [Consistency, Spec §FR-003]
- [ ] CHK003 - Are navigation requirements clear for all clickable brand elements? [Clarity, Spec §FR-010]
- [ ] CHK004 - Is the selection criteria for related episodes documented? [Gap, Spec §FR-005]
- [ ] CHK005 - Are loading state requirements defined for asynchronous episode data? [Gap]
- [ ] CHK006 - Can "visual hierarchy" requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-001]
```
**Key Differences:**
- Wrong: Tests if the system works correctly
- Correct: Tests if the requirements are written correctly
- Wrong: Verification of behavior
- Correct: Validation of requirement quality
- Wrong: "Does it do X?"
- Correct: "Is X clearly specified?"
+181
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
---
description: Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
handoffs:
- label: Build Technical Plan
agent: speckit.plan
prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly in the spec file.
Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking `/speckit.plan`. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
Execution steps:
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --paths-only` from repo root **once** (combined `--json --paths-only` mode / `-Json -PathsOnly`). Parse minimal JSON payload fields:
- `FEATURE_DIR`
- `FEATURE_SPEC`
- (Optionally capture `IMPL_PLAN`, `TASKS` for future chained flows.)
- If JSON parsing fails, abort and instruct user to re-run `/speckit.specify` or verify feature branch environment.
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load the current spec file. Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
Functional Scope & Behavior:
- Core user goals & success criteria
- Explicit out-of-scope declarations
- User roles / personas differentiation
Domain & Data Model:
- Entities, attributes, relationships
- Identity & uniqueness rules
- Lifecycle/state transitions
- Data volume / scale assumptions
Interaction & UX Flow:
- Critical user journeys / sequences
- Error/empty/loading states
- Accessibility or localization notes
Non-Functional Quality Attributes:
- Performance (latency, throughput targets)
- Scalability (horizontal/vertical, limits)
- Reliability & availability (uptime, recovery expectations)
- Observability (logging, metrics, tracing signals)
- Security & privacy (authN/Z, data protection, threat assumptions)
- Compliance / regulatory constraints (if any)
Integration & External Dependencies:
- External services/APIs and failure modes
- Data import/export formats
- Protocol/versioning assumptions
Edge Cases & Failure Handling:
- Negative scenarios
- Rate limiting / throttling
- Conflict resolution (e.g., concurrent edits)
Constraints & Tradeoffs:
- Technical constraints (language, storage, hosting)
- Explicit tradeoffs or rejected alternatives
Terminology & Consistency:
- Canonical glossary terms
- Avoided synonyms / deprecated terms
Completion Signals:
- Acceptance criteria testability
- Measurable Definition of Done style indicators
Misc / Placeholders:
- TODO markers / unresolved decisions
- Ambiguous adjectives ("robust", "intuitive") lacking quantification
For each category with Partial or Missing status, add a candidate question opportunity unless:
- Clarification would not materially change implementation or validation strategy
- Information is better deferred to planning phase (note internally)
3. Generate (internally) a prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5). Do NOT output them all at once. Apply these constraints:
- Maximum of 10 total questions across the whole session.
- Each question must be answerable with EITHER:
- A short multiplechoice selection (25 distinct, mutually exclusive options), OR
- A one-word / shortphrase answer (explicitly constrain: "Answer in <=5 words").
- Only include questions whose answers materially impact architecture, data modeling, task decomposition, test design, UX behavior, operational readiness, or compliance validation.
- Ensure category coverage balance: attempt to cover the highest impact unresolved categories first; avoid asking two low-impact questions when a single high-impact area (e.g., security posture) is unresolved.
- Exclude questions already answered, trivial stylistic preferences, or plan-level execution details (unless blocking correctness).
- Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk or prevent misaligned acceptance tests.
- If more than 5 categories remain unresolved, select the top 5 by (Impact * Uncertainty) heuristic.
4. Sequential questioning loop (interactive):
- Present EXACTLY ONE question at a time.
- For multiplechoice questions:
- **Analyze all options** and determine the **most suitable option** based on:
- Best practices for the project type
- Common patterns in similar implementations
- Risk reduction (security, performance, maintainability)
- Alignment with any explicit project goals or constraints visible in the spec
- Present your **recommended option prominently** at the top with clear reasoning (1-2 sentences explaining why this is the best choice).
- Format as: `**Recommended:** Option [X] - <reasoning>`
- Then render all options as a Markdown table:
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A | <Option A description> |
| B | <Option B description> |
| C | <Option C description> (add D/E as needed up to 5) |
| Short | Provide a different short answer (<=5 words) (Include only if free-form alternative is appropriate) |
- After the table, add: `You can reply with the option letter (e.g., "A"), accept the recommendation by saying "yes" or "recommended", or provide your own short answer.`
- For shortanswer style (no meaningful discrete options):
- Provide your **suggested answer** based on best practices and context.
- Format as: `**Suggested:** <your proposed answer> - <brief reasoning>`
- Then output: `Format: Short answer (<=5 words). You can accept the suggestion by saying "yes" or "suggested", or provide your own answer.`
- After the user answers:
- If the user replies with "yes", "recommended", or "suggested", use your previously stated recommendation/suggestion as the answer.
- Otherwise, validate the answer maps to one option or fits the <=5 word constraint.
- If ambiguous, ask for a quick disambiguation (count still belongs to same question; do not advance).
- Once satisfactory, record it in working memory (do not yet write to disk) and move to the next queued question.
- Stop asking further questions when:
- All critical ambiguities resolved early (remaining queued items become unnecessary), OR
- User signals completion ("done", "good", "no more"), OR
- You reach 5 asked questions.
- Never reveal future queued questions in advance.
- If no valid questions exist at start, immediately report no critical ambiguities.
5. Integration after EACH accepted answer (incremental update approach):
- Maintain in-memory representation of the spec (loaded once at start) plus the raw file contents.
- For the first integrated answer in this session:
- Ensure a `## Clarifications` section exists (create it just after the highest-level contextual/overview section per the spec template if missing).
- Under it, create (if not present) a `### Session YYYY-MM-DD` subheading for today.
- Append a bullet line immediately after acceptance: `- Q: <question> → A: <final answer>`.
- Then immediately apply the clarification to the most appropriate section(s):
- Functional ambiguity → Update or add a bullet in Functional Requirements.
- User interaction / actor distinction → Update User Stories or Actors subsection (if present) with clarified role, constraint, or scenario.
- Data shape / entities → Update Data Model (add fields, types, relationships) preserving ordering; note added constraints succinctly.
- Non-functional constraint → Add/modify measurable criteria in Non-Functional / Quality Attributes section (convert vague adjective to metric or explicit target).
- Edge case / negative flow → Add a new bullet under Edge Cases / Error Handling (or create such subsection if template provides placeholder for it).
- Terminology conflict → Normalize term across spec; retain original only if necessary by adding `(formerly referred to as "X")` once.
- If the clarification invalidates an earlier ambiguous statement, replace that statement instead of duplicating; leave no obsolete contradictory text.
- Save the spec file AFTER each integration to minimize risk of context loss (atomic overwrite).
- Preserve formatting: do not reorder unrelated sections; keep heading hierarchy intact.
- Keep each inserted clarification minimal and testable (avoid narrative drift).
6. Validation (performed after EACH write plus final pass):
- Clarifications session contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer (no duplicates).
- Total asked (accepted) questions ≤ 5.
- Updated sections contain no lingering vague placeholders the new answer was meant to resolve.
- No contradictory earlier statement remains (scan for now-invalid alternative choices removed).
- Markdown structure valid; only allowed new headings: `## Clarifications`, `### Session YYYY-MM-DD`.
- Terminology consistency: same canonical term used across all updated sections.
7. Write the updated spec back to `FEATURE_SPEC`.
8. Report completion (after questioning loop ends or early termination):
- Number of questions asked & answered.
- Path to updated spec.
- Sections touched (list names).
- Coverage summary table listing each taxonomy category with Status: Resolved (was Partial/Missing and addressed), Deferred (exceeds question quota or better suited for planning), Clear (already sufficient), Outstanding (still Partial/Missing but low impact).
- If any Outstanding or Deferred remain, recommend whether to proceed to `/speckit.plan` or run `/speckit.clarify` again later post-plan.
- Suggested next command.
Behavior rules:
- If no meaningful ambiguities found (or all potential questions would be low-impact), respond: "No critical ambiguities detected worth formal clarification." and suggest proceeding.
- If spec file missing, instruct user to run `/speckit.specify` first (do not create a new spec here).
- Never exceed 5 total asked questions (clarification retries for a single question do not count as new questions).
- Avoid speculative tech stack questions unless the absence blocks functional clarity.
- Respect user early termination signals ("stop", "done", "proceed").
- If no questions asked due to full coverage, output a compact coverage summary (all categories Clear) then suggest advancing.
- If quota reached with unresolved high-impact categories remaining, explicitly flag them under Deferred with rationale.
Context for prioritization: $ARGUMENTS
+84
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
---
description: Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync.
handoffs:
- label: Build Specification
agent: speckit.specify
prompt: Implement the feature specification based on the updated constitution. I want to build...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
You are updating the project constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. This file is a TEMPLATE containing placeholder tokens in square brackets (e.g. `[PROJECT_NAME]`, `[PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]`). Your job is to (a) collect/derive concrete values, (b) fill the template precisely, and (c) propagate any amendments across dependent artifacts.
**Note**: If `.specify/memory/constitution.md` does not exist yet, it should have been initialized from `.specify/templates/constitution-template.md` during project setup. If it's missing, copy the template first.
Follow this execution flow:
1. Load the existing constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`.
- Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
**IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
- If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
- Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
- For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
- `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
- MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
- MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
- PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
- If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
3. Draft the updated constitution content:
- Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
- Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
- Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing nonnegotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
- Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
4. Consistency propagation checklist (convert prior checklist into active validations):
- Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure any "Constitution Check" or rules align with updated principles.
- Read `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` for scope/requirements alignment—update if constitution adds/removes mandatory sections or constraints.
- Read `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` and ensure task categorization reflects new or removed principle-driven task types (e.g., observability, versioning, testing discipline).
- Read each command file in `.specify/templates/commands/*.md` (including this one) to verify no outdated references (agent-specific names like CLAUDE only) remain when generic guidance is required.
- Read any runtime guidance docs (e.g., `README.md`, `docs/quickstart.md`, or agent-specific guidance files if present). Update references to principles changed.
5. Produce a Sync Impact Report (prepend as an HTML comment at top of the constitution file after update):
- Version change: old → new
- List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
- Added sections
- Removed sections
- Templates requiring updates (✅ updated / ⚠ pending) with file paths
- Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
6. Validation before final output:
- No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
- Version line matches report.
- Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
- Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
7. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
8. Output a final summary to the user with:
- New version and bump rationale.
- Any files flagged for manual follow-up.
- Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
Formatting & Style Requirements:
- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
- Keep a single blank line between sections.
- Avoid trailing whitespace.
If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
Do not create a new template; always operate on the existing `.specify/memory/constitution.md` file.
+135
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
---
description: Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Check checklists status** (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
- Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
- For each checklist, count:
- Total items: All lines matching `- [ ]` or `- [X]` or `- [x]`
- Completed items: Lines matching `- [X]` or `- [x]`
- Incomplete items: Lines matching `- [ ]`
- Create a status table:
```text
| Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status |
|-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------|
| ux.md | 12 | 12 | 0 | ✓ PASS |
| test.md | 8 | 5 | 3 | ✗ FAIL |
| security.md | 6 | 6 | 0 | ✓ PASS |
```
- Calculate overall status:
- **PASS**: All checklists have 0 incomplete items
- **FAIL**: One or more checklists have incomplete items
- **If any checklist is incomplete**:
- Display the table with incomplete item counts
- **STOP** and ask: "Some checklists are incomplete. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
- Wait for user response before continuing
- If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
- If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
- **If all checklists are complete**:
- Display the table showing all checklists passed
- Automatically proceed to step 3
3. Load and analyze the implementation context:
- **REQUIRED**: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
- **REQUIRED**: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
- **IF EXISTS**: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
- **IF EXISTS**: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
- **IF EXISTS**: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
- **IF EXISTS**: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
4. **Project Setup Verification**:
- **REQUIRED**: Create/verify ignore files based on actual project setup:
**Detection & Creation Logic**:
- Check if the following command succeeds to determine if the repository is a git repo (create/verify .gitignore if so):
```sh
git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null
```
- Check if Dockerfile* exists or Docker in plan.md → create/verify .dockerignore
- Check if .eslintrc* exists → create/verify .eslintignore
- Check if eslint.config.* exists → ensure the config's `ignores` entries cover required patterns
- Check if .prettierrc* exists → create/verify .prettierignore
- Check if .npmrc or package.json exists → create/verify .npmignore (if publishing)
- Check if terraform files (*.tf) exist → create/verify .terraformignore
- Check if .helmignore needed (helm charts present) → create/verify .helmignore
**If ignore file already exists**: Verify it contains essential patterns, append missing critical patterns only
**If ignore file missing**: Create with full pattern set for detected technology
**Common Patterns by Technology** (from plan.md tech stack):
- **Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Python**: `__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`, `.venv/`, `venv/`, `dist/`, `*.egg-info/`
- **Java**: `target/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `.gradle/`, `build/`
- **C#/.NET**: `bin/`, `obj/`, `*.user`, `*.suo`, `packages/`
- **Go**: `*.exe`, `*.test`, `vendor/`, `*.out`
- **Ruby**: `.bundle/`, `log/`, `tmp/`, `*.gem`, `vendor/bundle/`
- **PHP**: `vendor/`, `*.log`, `*.cache`, `*.env`
- **Rust**: `target/`, `debug/`, `release/`, `*.rs.bk`, `*.rlib`, `*.prof*`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Kotlin**: `build/`, `out/`, `.gradle/`, `.idea/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `*.iml`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **C++**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.so`, `*.a`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **C**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.a`, `*.so`, `*.exe`, `Makefile`, `config.log`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Swift**: `.build/`, `DerivedData/`, `*.swiftpm/`, `Packages/`
- **R**: `.Rproj.user/`, `.Rhistory`, `.RData`, `.Ruserdata`, `*.Rproj`, `packrat/`, `renv/`
- **Universal**: `.DS_Store`, `Thumbs.db`, `*.tmp`, `*.swp`, `.vscode/`, `.idea/`
**Tool-Specific Patterns**:
- **Docker**: `node_modules/`, `.git/`, `Dockerfile*`, `.dockerignore`, `*.log*`, `.env*`, `coverage/`
- **ESLint**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `*.min.js`
- **Prettier**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `package-lock.json`, `yarn.lock`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`
- **Terraform**: `.terraform/`, `*.tfstate*`, `*.tfvars`, `.terraform.lock.hcl`
- **Kubernetes/k8s**: `*.secret.yaml`, `secrets/`, `.kube/`, `kubeconfig*`, `*.key`, `*.crt`
5. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:
- **Task phases**: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
- **Task dependencies**: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
- **Task details**: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
- **Execution flow**: Order and dependency requirements
6. Execute implementation following the task plan:
- **Phase-by-phase execution**: Complete each phase before moving to the next
- **Respect dependencies**: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together
- **Follow TDD approach**: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
- **File-based coordination**: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
- **Validation checkpoints**: Verify each phase completion before proceeding
7. Implementation execution rules:
- **Setup first**: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
- **Tests before code**: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
- **Core development**: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
- **Integration work**: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
- **Polish and validation**: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation
8. Progress tracking and error handling:
- Report progress after each completed task
- Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
- For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
- Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
- Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
- **IMPORTANT** For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.
9. Completion validation:
- Verify all required tasks are completed
- Check that implemented features match the original specification
- Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
- Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
- Report final status with summary of completed work
Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running `/speckit.tasks` first to regenerate the task list.
+89
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
---
description: Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
handoffs:
- label: Create Tasks
agent: speckit.tasks
prompt: Break the plan into tasks
send: true
- label: Create Checklist
agent: speckit.checklist
prompt: Create a checklist for the following domain...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
- Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
- Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
- Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
- Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
- Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
- Phase 1: Update agent context by running the agent script
- Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
4. **Stop and report**: Command ends after Phase 2 planning. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
## Phases
### Phase 0: Outline & Research
1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
- For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
- For each dependency → best practices task
- For each integration → patterns task
2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
```text
For each unknown in Technical Context:
Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
For each technology choice:
Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
```
3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
- Decision: [what was chosen]
- Rationale: [why chosen]
- Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
### Phase 1: Design & Contracts
**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
- Entity name, fields, relationships
- Validation rules from requirements
- State transitions if applicable
2. **Generate API contracts** from functional requirements:
- For each user action → endpoint
- Use standard REST/GraphQL patterns
- Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to `/contracts/`
3. **Agent context update**:
- Run `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh cursor-agent`
- These scripts detect which AI agent is in use
- Update the appropriate agent-specific context file
- Add only new technology from current plan
- Preserve manual additions between markers
**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, agent-specific file
## Key rules
- Use absolute paths
- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications
+258
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
---
description: Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
handoffs:
- label: Build Technical Plan
agent: speckit.plan
prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
- label: Clarify Spec Requirements
agent: speckit.clarify
prompt: Clarify specification requirements
send: true
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
The text the user typed after `/speckit.specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
Given that feature description, do this:
1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the branch:
- Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
- Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
- Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
- Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
- Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
- Examples:
- "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
- "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
- "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
- "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
2. **Check for existing branches before creating new one**:
a. First, fetch all remote branches to ensure we have the latest information:
```bash
git fetch --all --prune
```
b. Find the highest feature number across all sources for the short-name:
- Remote branches: `git ls-remote --heads origin | grep -E 'refs/heads/[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
- Local branches: `git branch | grep -E '^[* ]*[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
- Specs directories: Check for directories matching `specs/[0-9]+-<short-name>`
c. Determine the next available number:
- Extract all numbers from all three sources
- Find the highest number N
- Use N+1 for the new branch number
d. Run the script `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS"` with the calculated number and short-name:
- Pass `--number N+1` and `--short-name "your-short-name"` along with the feature description
- Bash example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" --json --number 5 --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
- PowerShell example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Number 5 -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
**IMPORTANT**:
- Check all three sources (remote branches, local branches, specs directories) to find the highest number
- Only match branches/directories with the exact short-name pattern
- If no existing branches/directories found with this short-name, start with number 1
- You must only ever run this script once per feature
- The JSON is provided in the terminal as output - always refer to it to get the actual content you're looking for
- The JSON output will contain BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE paths
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot")
3. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
4. Follow this execution flow:
1. Parse user description from Input
If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
2. Extract key concepts from description
Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
3. For unclear aspects:
- Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
- Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
- The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
- Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
- No reasonable default exists
- **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
- Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
5. Generate Functional Requirements
Each requirement must be testable
Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
6. Define Success Criteria
Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
5. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
6. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
```markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: [DATE]
**Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
## Content Quality
- [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
- [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [ ] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
- [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [ ] Edge cases are identified
- [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
- [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
## Notes
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
```
b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
- For each item, determine if it passes or fails
- Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
c. **Handle Validation Results**:
- **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 6
- **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
1. List the failing items and specific issues
2. Update the spec to address each issue
3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
- **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
```markdown
## Question [N]: [Topic]
**Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
**What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
**Suggested Answers**:
| Option | Answer | Implications |
|--------|--------|--------------|
| A | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| B | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| C | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
**Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
```
4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
- Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
- Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
- Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
- Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
7. Report completion with branch name, spec file path, checklist results, and readiness for the next phase (`/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`).
**NOTE:** The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
## General Guidelines
## Quick Guidelines
- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
### Section Requirements
- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
### For AI Generation
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
- Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
- Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
- Lack any reasonable default
4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
- Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
- User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
- Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
- Integration patterns: RESTful APIs unless specified otherwise
### Success Criteria Guidelines
Success criteria must be:
1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
**Good examples**:
- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)
+137
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
---
description: Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
handoffs:
- label: Analyze For Consistency
agent: speckit.analyze
prompt: Run a project analysis for consistency
send: true
- label: Implement Project
agent: speckit.implement
prompt: Start the implementation in phases
send: true
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
- **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (API endpoints), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
- Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
- Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
- Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
- If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
- If contracts/ exists: Map endpoints to user stories
- If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
- Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
- Create parallel execution examples per user story
- Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
4. **Generate tasks.md**: Use `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` as structure, fill with:
- Correct feature name from plan.md
- Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
- Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
- Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
- Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
- Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
- All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Clear file paths for each task
- Dependencies section showing story completion order
- Parallel execution examples per story
- Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
5. **Report**: Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
- Total task count
- Task count per user story
- Parallel opportunities identified
- Independent test criteria for each story
- Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
- Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
## Task Generation Rules
**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
```text
- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
```
**Format Components**:
1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
- Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
- Setup phase: NO story label
- Foundational phase: NO story label
- User Story phases: MUST have story label
- Polish phase: NO story label
5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
**Examples**:
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
### Task Organization
1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
- Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
- Map all related components to their story:
- Models needed for that story
- Services needed for that story
- Endpoints/UI needed for that story
- If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
- Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
2. **From Contracts**:
- Map each contract/endpoint → to the user story it serves
- If tests requested: Each contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
3. **From Data Model**:
- Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
- If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
- Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
- Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
- Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
- Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
### Phase Structure
- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
- Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
- Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
---
description: Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.
tools: ['github/github-mcp-server/issue_write']
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
1. Get the Git remote by running:
```bash
git config --get remote.origin.url
```
> [!CAUTION]
> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
> [!CAUTION]
> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
+184
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
---
description: Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/speckit.tasks` has successfully produced a complete `tasks.md`.
## Operating Constraints
**STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is **non-negotiable** within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside `/speckit.analyze`.
## Execution Steps
### 1. Initialize Analysis Context
Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command).
For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
**From spec.md:**
- Overview/Context
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
- User Stories
- Edge Cases (if present)
**From plan.md:**
- Architecture/stack choices
- Data Model references
- Phases
- Technical constraints
**From tasks.md:**
- Task IDs
- Descriptions
- Phase grouping
- Parallel markers [P]
- Referenced file paths
**From constitution:**
- Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for principle validation
### 3. Build Semantic Models
Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
- **Requirements inventory**: Each functional + non-functional requirement with a stable key (derive slug based on imperative phrase; e.g., "User can upload file" → `user-can-upload-file`)
- **User story/action inventory**: Discrete user actions with acceptance criteria
- **Task coverage mapping**: Map each task to one or more requirements or stories (inference by keyword / explicit reference patterns like IDs or key phrases)
- **Constitution rule set**: Extract principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
### 4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
#### A. Duplication Detection
- Identify near-duplicate requirements
- Mark lower-quality phrasing for consolidation
#### B. Ambiguity Detection
- Flag vague adjectives (fast, scalable, secure, intuitive, robust) lacking measurable criteria
- Flag unresolved placeholders (TODO, TKTK, ???, `<placeholder>`, etc.)
#### C. Underspecification
- Requirements with verbs but missing object or measurable outcome
- User stories missing acceptance criteria alignment
- Tasks referencing files or components not defined in spec/plan
#### D. Constitution Alignment
- Any requirement or plan element conflicting with a MUST principle
- Missing mandated sections or quality gates from constitution
#### E. Coverage Gaps
- Requirements with zero associated tasks
- Tasks with no mapped requirement/story
- Non-functional requirements not reflected in tasks (e.g., performance, security)
#### F. Inconsistency
- Terminology drift (same concept named differently across files)
- Data entities referenced in plan but absent in spec (or vice versa)
- Task ordering contradictions (e.g., integration tasks before foundational setup tasks without dependency note)
- Conflicting requirements (e.g., one requires Next.js while other specifies Vue)
### 5. Severity Assignment
Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
- **CRITICAL**: Violates constitution MUST, missing core spec artifact, or requirement with zero coverage that blocks baseline functionality
- **HIGH**: Duplicate or conflicting requirement, ambiguous security/performance attribute, untestable acceptance criterion
- **MEDIUM**: Terminology drift, missing non-functional task coverage, underspecified edge case
- **LOW**: Style/wording improvements, minor redundancy not affecting execution order
### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
## Specification Analysis Report
| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| A1 | Duplication | HIGH | spec.md:L120-134 | Two similar requirements ... | Merge phrasing; keep clearer version |
(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by category initial.)
**Coverage Summary Table:**
| Requirement Key | Has Task? | Task IDs | Notes |
|-----------------|-----------|----------|-------|
**Constitution Alignment Issues:** (if any)
**Unmapped Tasks:** (if any)
**Metrics:**
- Total Requirements
- Total Tasks
- Coverage % (requirements with >=1 task)
- Ambiguity Count
- Duplication Count
- Critical Issues Count
### 7. Provide Next Actions
At end of report, output a concise Next Actions block:
- If CRITICAL issues exist: Recommend resolving before `/speckit.implement`
- If only LOW/MEDIUM: User may proceed, but provide improvement suggestions
- Provide explicit command suggestions: e.g., "Run /speckit.specify with refinement", "Run /speckit.plan to adjust architecture", "Manually edit tasks.md to add coverage for 'performance-metrics'"
### 8. Offer Remediation
Ask the user: "Would you like me to suggest concrete remediation edits for the top N issues?" (Do NOT apply them automatically.)
## Operating Principles
### Context Efficiency
- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings, not exhaustive documentation
- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally; don't dump all content into analysis
- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes should produce consistent IDs and counts
### Analysis Guidelines
- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
- **Prioritize constitution violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances, not generic patterns)
- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
## Context
$ARGUMENTS
+294
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
---
description: Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
---
## Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"
**CRITICAL CONCEPT**: Checklists are **UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING** - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
**NOT for verification/testing**:
- ❌ NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
- ❌ NOT "Test error handling works"
- ❌ NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
- ❌ NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec
**FOR requirements quality validation**:
- ✅ "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
- ✅ "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
- ✅ "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
- ✅ "Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
- ✅ "Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)
**Metaphor**: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Execution Steps
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list.
- All file paths must be absolute.
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Clarify intent (dynamic)**: Derive up to THREE initial contextual clarifying questions (no pre-baked catalog). They MUST:
- Be generated from the user's phrasing + extracted signals from spec/plan/tasks
- Only ask about information that materially changes checklist content
- Be skipped individually if already unambiguous in `$ARGUMENTS`
- Prefer precision over breadth
Generation algorithm:
1. Extract signals: feature domain keywords (e.g., auth, latency, UX, API), risk indicators ("critical", "must", "compliance"), stakeholder hints ("QA", "review", "security team"), and explicit deliverables ("a11y", "rollback", "contracts").
2. Cluster signals into candidate focus areas (max 4) ranked by relevance.
3. Identify probable audience & timing (author, reviewer, QA, release) if not explicit.
4. Detect missing dimensions: scope breadth, depth/rigor, risk emphasis, exclusion boundaries, measurable acceptance criteria.
5. Formulate questions chosen from these archetypes:
- Scope refinement (e.g., "Should this include integration touchpoints with X and Y or stay limited to local module correctness?")
- Risk prioritization (e.g., "Which of these potential risk areas should receive mandatory gating checks?")
- Depth calibration (e.g., "Is this a lightweight pre-commit sanity list or a formal release gate?")
- Audience framing (e.g., "Will this be used by the author only or peers during PR review?")
- Boundary exclusion (e.g., "Should we explicitly exclude performance tuning items this round?")
- Scenario class gap (e.g., "No recovery flows detected—are rollback / partial failure paths in scope?")
Question formatting rules:
- If presenting options, generate a compact table with columns: Option | Candidate | Why It Matters
- Limit to AE options maximum; omit table if a free-form answer is clearer
- Never ask the user to restate what they already said
- Avoid speculative categories (no hallucination). If uncertain, ask explicitly: "Confirm whether X belongs in scope."
Defaults when interaction impossible:
- Depth: Standard
- Audience: Reviewer (PR) if code-related; Author otherwise
- Focus: Top 2 relevance clusters
Output the questions (label Q1/Q2/Q3). After answers: if ≥2 scenario classes (Alternate / Exception / Recovery / Non-Functional domain) remain unclear, you MAY ask up to TWO more targeted followups (Q4/Q5) with a one-line justification each (e.g., "Unresolved recovery path risk"). Do not exceed five total questions. Skip escalation if user explicitly declines more.
3. **Understand user request**: Combine `$ARGUMENTS` + clarifying answers:
- Derive checklist theme (e.g., security, review, deploy, ux)
- Consolidate explicit must-have items mentioned by user
- Map focus selections to category scaffolding
- Infer any missing context from spec/plan/tasks (do NOT hallucinate)
4. **Load feature context**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- spec.md: Feature requirements and scope
- plan.md (if exists): Technical details, dependencies
- tasks.md (if exists): Implementation tasks
**Context Loading Strategy**:
- Load only necessary portions relevant to active focus areas (avoid full-file dumping)
- Prefer summarizing long sections into concise scenario/requirement bullets
- Use progressive disclosure: add follow-on retrieval only if gaps detected
- If source docs are large, generate interim summary items instead of embedding raw text
5. **Generate checklist** - Create "Unit Tests for Requirements":
- Create `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/` directory if it doesn't exist
- Generate unique checklist filename:
- Use short, descriptive name based on domain (e.g., `ux.md`, `api.md`, `security.md`)
- Format: `[domain].md`
- If file exists, append to existing file
- Number items sequentially starting from CHK001
- Each `/speckit.checklist` run creates a NEW file (never overwrites existing checklists)
**CORE PRINCIPLE - Test the Requirements, Not the Implementation**:
Every checklist item MUST evaluate the REQUIREMENTS THEMSELVES for:
- **Completeness**: Are all necessary requirements present?
- **Clarity**: Are requirements unambiguous and specific?
- **Consistency**: Do requirements align with each other?
- **Measurability**: Can requirements be objectively verified?
- **Coverage**: Are all scenarios/edge cases addressed?
**Category Structure** - Group items by requirement quality dimensions:
- **Requirement Completeness** (Are all necessary requirements documented?)
- **Requirement Clarity** (Are requirements specific and unambiguous?)
- **Requirement Consistency** (Do requirements align without conflicts?)
- **Acceptance Criteria Quality** (Are success criteria measurable?)
- **Scenario Coverage** (Are all flows/cases addressed?)
- **Edge Case Coverage** (Are boundary conditions defined?)
- **Non-Functional Requirements** (Performance, Security, Accessibility, etc. - are they specified?)
- **Dependencies & Assumptions** (Are they documented and validated?)
- **Ambiguities & Conflicts** (What needs clarification?)
**HOW TO WRITE CHECKLIST ITEMS - "Unit Tests for English"**:
**WRONG** (Testing implementation):
- "Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards"
- "Test hover states work on desktop"
- "Confirm logo click navigates home"
**CORRECT** (Testing requirements quality):
- "Are the exact number and layout of featured episodes specified?" [Completeness]
- "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" [Clarity]
- "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" [Consistency]
- "Are keyboard navigation requirements defined for all interactive UI?" [Coverage]
- "Is the fallback behavior specified when logo image fails to load?" [Edge Cases]
- "Are loading states defined for asynchronous episode data?" [Completeness]
- "Does the spec define visual hierarchy for competing UI elements?" [Clarity]
**ITEM STRUCTURE**:
Each item should follow this pattern:
- Question format asking about requirement quality
- Focus on what's WRITTEN (or not written) in the spec/plan
- Include quality dimension in brackets [Completeness/Clarity/Consistency/etc.]
- Reference spec section `[Spec §X.Y]` when checking existing requirements
- Use `[Gap]` marker when checking for missing requirements
**EXAMPLES BY QUALITY DIMENSION**:
Completeness:
- "Are error handling requirements defined for all API failure modes? [Gap]"
- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Completeness]"
- "Are mobile breakpoint requirements defined for responsive layouts? [Gap]"
Clarity:
- "Is 'fast loading' quantified with specific timing thresholds? [Clarity, Spec §NFR-2]"
- "Are 'related episodes' selection criteria explicitly defined? [Clarity, Spec §FR-5]"
- "Is 'prominent' defined with measurable visual properties? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-4]"
Consistency:
- "Do navigation requirements align across all pages? [Consistency, Spec §FR-10]"
- "Are card component requirements consistent between landing and detail pages? [Consistency]"
Coverage:
- "Are requirements defined for zero-state scenarios (no episodes)? [Coverage, Edge Case]"
- "Are concurrent user interaction scenarios addressed? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Are requirements specified for partial data loading failures? [Coverage, Exception Flow]"
Measurability:
- "Are visual hierarchy requirements measurable/testable? [Acceptance Criteria, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Can 'balanced visual weight' be objectively verified? [Measurability, Spec §FR-2]"
**Scenario Classification & Coverage** (Requirements Quality Focus):
- Check if requirements exist for: Primary, Alternate, Exception/Error, Recovery, Non-Functional scenarios
- For each scenario class, ask: "Are [scenario type] requirements complete, clear, and consistent?"
- If scenario class missing: "Are [scenario type] requirements intentionally excluded or missing? [Gap]"
- Include resilience/rollback when state mutation occurs: "Are rollback requirements defined for migration failures? [Gap]"
**Traceability Requirements**:
- MINIMUM: ≥80% of items MUST include at least one traceability reference
- Each item should reference: spec section `[Spec §X.Y]`, or use markers: `[Gap]`, `[Ambiguity]`, `[Conflict]`, `[Assumption]`
- If no ID system exists: "Is a requirement & acceptance criteria ID scheme established? [Traceability]"
**Surface & Resolve Issues** (Requirements Quality Problems):
Ask questions about the requirements themselves:
- Ambiguities: "Is the term 'fast' quantified with specific metrics? [Ambiguity, Spec §NFR-1]"
- Conflicts: "Do navigation requirements conflict between §FR-10 and §FR-10a? [Conflict]"
- Assumptions: "Is the assumption of 'always available podcast API' validated? [Assumption]"
- Dependencies: "Are external podcast API requirements documented? [Dependency, Gap]"
- Missing definitions: "Is 'visual hierarchy' defined with measurable criteria? [Gap]"
**Content Consolidation**:
- Soft cap: If raw candidate items > 40, prioritize by risk/impact
- Merge near-duplicates checking the same requirement aspect
- If >5 low-impact edge cases, create one item: "Are edge cases X, Y, Z addressed in requirements? [Coverage]"
**🚫 ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED** - These make it an implementation test, not a requirements test:
- ❌ Any item starting with "Verify", "Test", "Confirm", "Check" + implementation behavior
- ❌ References to code execution, user actions, system behavior
- ❌ "Displays correctly", "works properly", "functions as expected"
- ❌ "Click", "navigate", "render", "load", "execute"
- ❌ Test cases, test plans, QA procedures
- ❌ Implementation details (frameworks, APIs, algorithms)
**✅ REQUIRED PATTERNS** - These test requirements quality:
- ✅ "Are [requirement type] defined/specified/documented for [scenario]?"
- ✅ "Is [vague term] quantified/clarified with specific criteria?"
- ✅ "Are requirements consistent between [section A] and [section B]?"
- ✅ "Can [requirement] be objectively measured/verified?"
- ✅ "Are [edge cases/scenarios] addressed in requirements?"
- ✅ "Does the spec define [missing aspect]?"
6. **Structure Reference**: Generate the checklist following the canonical template in `.specify/templates/checklist-template.md` for title, meta section, category headings, and ID formatting. If template is unavailable, use: H1 title, purpose/created meta lines, `##` category sections containing `- [ ] CHK### <requirement item>` lines with globally incrementing IDs starting at CHK001.
7. **Report**: Output full path to created checklist, item count, and remind user that each run creates a new file. Summarize:
- Focus areas selected
- Depth level
- Actor/timing
- Any explicit user-specified must-have items incorporated
**Important**: Each `/speckit.checklist` command invocation creates a checklist file using short, descriptive names unless file already exists. This allows:
- Multiple checklists of different types (e.g., `ux.md`, `test.md`, `security.md`)
- Simple, memorable filenames that indicate checklist purpose
- Easy identification and navigation in the `checklists/` folder
To avoid clutter, use descriptive types and clean up obsolete checklists when done.
## Example Checklist Types & Sample Items
**UX Requirements Quality:** `ux.md`
Sample items (testing the requirements, NOT the implementation):
- "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined with measurable criteria? [Clarity, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Is the number and positioning of UI elements explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Are interaction state requirements (hover, focus, active) consistently defined? [Consistency]"
- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Is fallback behavior defined when images fail to load? [Edge Case, Gap]"
- "Can 'prominent display' be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-4]"
**API Requirements Quality:** `api.md`
Sample items:
- "Are error response formats specified for all failure scenarios? [Completeness]"
- "Are rate limiting requirements quantified with specific thresholds? [Clarity]"
- "Are authentication requirements consistent across all endpoints? [Consistency]"
- "Are retry/timeout requirements defined for external dependencies? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Is versioning strategy documented in requirements? [Gap]"
**Performance Requirements Quality:** `performance.md`
Sample items:
- "Are performance requirements quantified with specific metrics? [Clarity]"
- "Are performance targets defined for all critical user journeys? [Coverage]"
- "Are performance requirements under different load conditions specified? [Completeness]"
- "Can performance requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability]"
- "Are degradation requirements defined for high-load scenarios? [Edge Case, Gap]"
**Security Requirements Quality:** `security.md`
Sample items:
- "Are authentication requirements specified for all protected resources? [Coverage]"
- "Are data protection requirements defined for sensitive information? [Completeness]"
- "Is the threat model documented and requirements aligned to it? [Traceability]"
- "Are security requirements consistent with compliance obligations? [Consistency]"
- "Are security failure/breach response requirements defined? [Gap, Exception Flow]"
## Anti-Examples: What NOT To Do
**❌ WRONG - These test implementation, not requirements:**
```markdown
- [ ] CHK001 - Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards [Spec §FR-001]
- [ ] CHK002 - Test hover states work correctly on desktop [Spec §FR-003]
- [ ] CHK003 - Confirm logo click navigates to home page [Spec §FR-010]
- [ ] CHK004 - Check that related episodes section shows 3-5 items [Spec §FR-005]
```
**✅ CORRECT - These test requirements quality:**
```markdown
- [ ] CHK001 - Are the number and layout of featured episodes explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-001]
- [ ] CHK002 - Are hover state requirements consistently defined for all interactive elements? [Consistency, Spec §FR-003]
- [ ] CHK003 - Are navigation requirements clear for all clickable brand elements? [Clarity, Spec §FR-010]
- [ ] CHK004 - Is the selection criteria for related episodes documented? [Gap, Spec §FR-005]
- [ ] CHK005 - Are loading state requirements defined for asynchronous episode data? [Gap]
- [ ] CHK006 - Can "visual hierarchy" requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-001]
```
**Key Differences:**
- Wrong: Tests if the system works correctly
- Correct: Tests if the requirements are written correctly
- Wrong: Verification of behavior
- Correct: Validation of requirement quality
- Wrong: "Does it do X?"
- Correct: "Is X clearly specified?"
+181
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
---
description: Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
handoffs:
- label: Build Technical Plan
agent: speckit.plan
prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly in the spec file.
Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking `/speckit.plan`. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
Execution steps:
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --paths-only` from repo root **once** (combined `--json --paths-only` mode / `-Json -PathsOnly`). Parse minimal JSON payload fields:
- `FEATURE_DIR`
- `FEATURE_SPEC`
- (Optionally capture `IMPL_PLAN`, `TASKS` for future chained flows.)
- If JSON parsing fails, abort and instruct user to re-run `/speckit.specify` or verify feature branch environment.
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load the current spec file. Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
Functional Scope & Behavior:
- Core user goals & success criteria
- Explicit out-of-scope declarations
- User roles / personas differentiation
Domain & Data Model:
- Entities, attributes, relationships
- Identity & uniqueness rules
- Lifecycle/state transitions
- Data volume / scale assumptions
Interaction & UX Flow:
- Critical user journeys / sequences
- Error/empty/loading states
- Accessibility or localization notes
Non-Functional Quality Attributes:
- Performance (latency, throughput targets)
- Scalability (horizontal/vertical, limits)
- Reliability & availability (uptime, recovery expectations)
- Observability (logging, metrics, tracing signals)
- Security & privacy (authN/Z, data protection, threat assumptions)
- Compliance / regulatory constraints (if any)
Integration & External Dependencies:
- External services/APIs and failure modes
- Data import/export formats
- Protocol/versioning assumptions
Edge Cases & Failure Handling:
- Negative scenarios
- Rate limiting / throttling
- Conflict resolution (e.g., concurrent edits)
Constraints & Tradeoffs:
- Technical constraints (language, storage, hosting)
- Explicit tradeoffs or rejected alternatives
Terminology & Consistency:
- Canonical glossary terms
- Avoided synonyms / deprecated terms
Completion Signals:
- Acceptance criteria testability
- Measurable Definition of Done style indicators
Misc / Placeholders:
- TODO markers / unresolved decisions
- Ambiguous adjectives ("robust", "intuitive") lacking quantification
For each category with Partial or Missing status, add a candidate question opportunity unless:
- Clarification would not materially change implementation or validation strategy
- Information is better deferred to planning phase (note internally)
3. Generate (internally) a prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5). Do NOT output them all at once. Apply these constraints:
- Maximum of 10 total questions across the whole session.
- Each question must be answerable with EITHER:
- A short multiplechoice selection (25 distinct, mutually exclusive options), OR
- A one-word / shortphrase answer (explicitly constrain: "Answer in <=5 words").
- Only include questions whose answers materially impact architecture, data modeling, task decomposition, test design, UX behavior, operational readiness, or compliance validation.
- Ensure category coverage balance: attempt to cover the highest impact unresolved categories first; avoid asking two low-impact questions when a single high-impact area (e.g., security posture) is unresolved.
- Exclude questions already answered, trivial stylistic preferences, or plan-level execution details (unless blocking correctness).
- Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk or prevent misaligned acceptance tests.
- If more than 5 categories remain unresolved, select the top 5 by (Impact * Uncertainty) heuristic.
4. Sequential questioning loop (interactive):
- Present EXACTLY ONE question at a time.
- For multiplechoice questions:
- **Analyze all options** and determine the **most suitable option** based on:
- Best practices for the project type
- Common patterns in similar implementations
- Risk reduction (security, performance, maintainability)
- Alignment with any explicit project goals or constraints visible in the spec
- Present your **recommended option prominently** at the top with clear reasoning (1-2 sentences explaining why this is the best choice).
- Format as: `**Recommended:** Option [X] - <reasoning>`
- Then render all options as a Markdown table:
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A | <Option A description> |
| B | <Option B description> |
| C | <Option C description> (add D/E as needed up to 5) |
| Short | Provide a different short answer (<=5 words) (Include only if free-form alternative is appropriate) |
- After the table, add: `You can reply with the option letter (e.g., "A"), accept the recommendation by saying "yes" or "recommended", or provide your own short answer.`
- For shortanswer style (no meaningful discrete options):
- Provide your **suggested answer** based on best practices and context.
- Format as: `**Suggested:** <your proposed answer> - <brief reasoning>`
- Then output: `Format: Short answer (<=5 words). You can accept the suggestion by saying "yes" or "suggested", or provide your own answer.`
- After the user answers:
- If the user replies with "yes", "recommended", or "suggested", use your previously stated recommendation/suggestion as the answer.
- Otherwise, validate the answer maps to one option or fits the <=5 word constraint.
- If ambiguous, ask for a quick disambiguation (count still belongs to same question; do not advance).
- Once satisfactory, record it in working memory (do not yet write to disk) and move to the next queued question.
- Stop asking further questions when:
- All critical ambiguities resolved early (remaining queued items become unnecessary), OR
- User signals completion ("done", "good", "no more"), OR
- You reach 5 asked questions.
- Never reveal future queued questions in advance.
- If no valid questions exist at start, immediately report no critical ambiguities.
5. Integration after EACH accepted answer (incremental update approach):
- Maintain in-memory representation of the spec (loaded once at start) plus the raw file contents.
- For the first integrated answer in this session:
- Ensure a `## Clarifications` section exists (create it just after the highest-level contextual/overview section per the spec template if missing).
- Under it, create (if not present) a `### Session YYYY-MM-DD` subheading for today.
- Append a bullet line immediately after acceptance: `- Q: <question> → A: <final answer>`.
- Then immediately apply the clarification to the most appropriate section(s):
- Functional ambiguity → Update or add a bullet in Functional Requirements.
- User interaction / actor distinction → Update User Stories or Actors subsection (if present) with clarified role, constraint, or scenario.
- Data shape / entities → Update Data Model (add fields, types, relationships) preserving ordering; note added constraints succinctly.
- Non-functional constraint → Add/modify measurable criteria in Non-Functional / Quality Attributes section (convert vague adjective to metric or explicit target).
- Edge case / negative flow → Add a new bullet under Edge Cases / Error Handling (or create such subsection if template provides placeholder for it).
- Terminology conflict → Normalize term across spec; retain original only if necessary by adding `(formerly referred to as "X")` once.
- If the clarification invalidates an earlier ambiguous statement, replace that statement instead of duplicating; leave no obsolete contradictory text.
- Save the spec file AFTER each integration to minimize risk of context loss (atomic overwrite).
- Preserve formatting: do not reorder unrelated sections; keep heading hierarchy intact.
- Keep each inserted clarification minimal and testable (avoid narrative drift).
6. Validation (performed after EACH write plus final pass):
- Clarifications session contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer (no duplicates).
- Total asked (accepted) questions ≤ 5.
- Updated sections contain no lingering vague placeholders the new answer was meant to resolve.
- No contradictory earlier statement remains (scan for now-invalid alternative choices removed).
- Markdown structure valid; only allowed new headings: `## Clarifications`, `### Session YYYY-MM-DD`.
- Terminology consistency: same canonical term used across all updated sections.
7. Write the updated spec back to `FEATURE_SPEC`.
8. Report completion (after questioning loop ends or early termination):
- Number of questions asked & answered.
- Path to updated spec.
- Sections touched (list names).
- Coverage summary table listing each taxonomy category with Status: Resolved (was Partial/Missing and addressed), Deferred (exceeds question quota or better suited for planning), Clear (already sufficient), Outstanding (still Partial/Missing but low impact).
- If any Outstanding or Deferred remain, recommend whether to proceed to `/speckit.plan` or run `/speckit.clarify` again later post-plan.
- Suggested next command.
Behavior rules:
- If no meaningful ambiguities found (or all potential questions would be low-impact), respond: "No critical ambiguities detected worth formal clarification." and suggest proceeding.
- If spec file missing, instruct user to run `/speckit.specify` first (do not create a new spec here).
- Never exceed 5 total asked questions (clarification retries for a single question do not count as new questions).
- Avoid speculative tech stack questions unless the absence blocks functional clarity.
- Respect user early termination signals ("stop", "done", "proceed").
- If no questions asked due to full coverage, output a compact coverage summary (all categories Clear) then suggest advancing.
- If quota reached with unresolved high-impact categories remaining, explicitly flag them under Deferred with rationale.
Context for prioritization: $ARGUMENTS
+84
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
---
description: Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync.
handoffs:
- label: Build Specification
agent: speckit.specify
prompt: Implement the feature specification based on the updated constitution. I want to build...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
You are updating the project constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. This file is a TEMPLATE containing placeholder tokens in square brackets (e.g. `[PROJECT_NAME]`, `[PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]`). Your job is to (a) collect/derive concrete values, (b) fill the template precisely, and (c) propagate any amendments across dependent artifacts.
**Note**: If `.specify/memory/constitution.md` does not exist yet, it should have been initialized from `.specify/templates/constitution-template.md` during project setup. If it's missing, copy the template first.
Follow this execution flow:
1. Load the existing constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`.
- Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
**IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
- If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
- Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
- For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
- `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
- MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
- MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
- PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
- If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
3. Draft the updated constitution content:
- Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
- Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
- Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing nonnegotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
- Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
4. Consistency propagation checklist (convert prior checklist into active validations):
- Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure any "Constitution Check" or rules align with updated principles.
- Read `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` for scope/requirements alignment—update if constitution adds/removes mandatory sections or constraints.
- Read `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` and ensure task categorization reflects new or removed principle-driven task types (e.g., observability, versioning, testing discipline).
- Read each command file in `.specify/templates/commands/*.md` (including this one) to verify no outdated references (agent-specific names like CLAUDE only) remain when generic guidance is required.
- Read any runtime guidance docs (e.g., `README.md`, `docs/quickstart.md`, or agent-specific guidance files if present). Update references to principles changed.
5. Produce a Sync Impact Report (prepend as an HTML comment at top of the constitution file after update):
- Version change: old → new
- List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
- Added sections
- Removed sections
- Templates requiring updates (✅ updated / ⚠ pending) with file paths
- Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
6. Validation before final output:
- No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
- Version line matches report.
- Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
- Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
7. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
8. Output a final summary to the user with:
- New version and bump rationale.
- Any files flagged for manual follow-up.
- Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
Formatting & Style Requirements:
- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
- Keep a single blank line between sections.
- Avoid trailing whitespace.
If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
Do not create a new template; always operate on the existing `.specify/memory/constitution.md` file.
+135
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
---
description: Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Check checklists status** (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
- Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
- For each checklist, count:
- Total items: All lines matching `- [ ]` or `- [X]` or `- [x]`
- Completed items: Lines matching `- [X]` or `- [x]`
- Incomplete items: Lines matching `- [ ]`
- Create a status table:
```text
| Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status |
|-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------|
| ux.md | 12 | 12 | 0 | ✓ PASS |
| test.md | 8 | 5 | 3 | ✗ FAIL |
| security.md | 6 | 6 | 0 | ✓ PASS |
```
- Calculate overall status:
- **PASS**: All checklists have 0 incomplete items
- **FAIL**: One or more checklists have incomplete items
- **If any checklist is incomplete**:
- Display the table with incomplete item counts
- **STOP** and ask: "Some checklists are incomplete. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
- Wait for user response before continuing
- If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
- If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
- **If all checklists are complete**:
- Display the table showing all checklists passed
- Automatically proceed to step 3
3. Load and analyze the implementation context:
- **REQUIRED**: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
- **REQUIRED**: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
- **IF EXISTS**: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
- **IF EXISTS**: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
- **IF EXISTS**: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
- **IF EXISTS**: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
4. **Project Setup Verification**:
- **REQUIRED**: Create/verify ignore files based on actual project setup:
**Detection & Creation Logic**:
- Check if the following command succeeds to determine if the repository is a git repo (create/verify .gitignore if so):
```sh
git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null
```
- Check if Dockerfile* exists or Docker in plan.md → create/verify .dockerignore
- Check if .eslintrc* exists → create/verify .eslintignore
- Check if eslint.config.* exists → ensure the config's `ignores` entries cover required patterns
- Check if .prettierrc* exists → create/verify .prettierignore
- Check if .npmrc or package.json exists → create/verify .npmignore (if publishing)
- Check if terraform files (*.tf) exist → create/verify .terraformignore
- Check if .helmignore needed (helm charts present) → create/verify .helmignore
**If ignore file already exists**: Verify it contains essential patterns, append missing critical patterns only
**If ignore file missing**: Create with full pattern set for detected technology
**Common Patterns by Technology** (from plan.md tech stack):
- **Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Python**: `__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`, `.venv/`, `venv/`, `dist/`, `*.egg-info/`
- **Java**: `target/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `.gradle/`, `build/`
- **C#/.NET**: `bin/`, `obj/`, `*.user`, `*.suo`, `packages/`
- **Go**: `*.exe`, `*.test`, `vendor/`, `*.out`
- **Ruby**: `.bundle/`, `log/`, `tmp/`, `*.gem`, `vendor/bundle/`
- **PHP**: `vendor/`, `*.log`, `*.cache`, `*.env`
- **Rust**: `target/`, `debug/`, `release/`, `*.rs.bk`, `*.rlib`, `*.prof*`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Kotlin**: `build/`, `out/`, `.gradle/`, `.idea/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `*.iml`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **C++**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.so`, `*.a`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **C**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.a`, `*.so`, `*.exe`, `Makefile`, `config.log`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Swift**: `.build/`, `DerivedData/`, `*.swiftpm/`, `Packages/`
- **R**: `.Rproj.user/`, `.Rhistory`, `.RData`, `.Ruserdata`, `*.Rproj`, `packrat/`, `renv/`
- **Universal**: `.DS_Store`, `Thumbs.db`, `*.tmp`, `*.swp`, `.vscode/`, `.idea/`
**Tool-Specific Patterns**:
- **Docker**: `node_modules/`, `.git/`, `Dockerfile*`, `.dockerignore`, `*.log*`, `.env*`, `coverage/`
- **ESLint**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `*.min.js`
- **Prettier**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `package-lock.json`, `yarn.lock`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`
- **Terraform**: `.terraform/`, `*.tfstate*`, `*.tfvars`, `.terraform.lock.hcl`
- **Kubernetes/k8s**: `*.secret.yaml`, `secrets/`, `.kube/`, `kubeconfig*`, `*.key`, `*.crt`
5. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:
- **Task phases**: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
- **Task dependencies**: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
- **Task details**: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
- **Execution flow**: Order and dependency requirements
6. Execute implementation following the task plan:
- **Phase-by-phase execution**: Complete each phase before moving to the next
- **Respect dependencies**: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together
- **Follow TDD approach**: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
- **File-based coordination**: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
- **Validation checkpoints**: Verify each phase completion before proceeding
7. Implementation execution rules:
- **Setup first**: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
- **Tests before code**: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
- **Core development**: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
- **Integration work**: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
- **Polish and validation**: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation
8. Progress tracking and error handling:
- Report progress after each completed task
- Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
- For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
- Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
- Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
- **IMPORTANT** For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.
9. Completion validation:
- Verify all required tasks are completed
- Check that implemented features match the original specification
- Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
- Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
- Report final status with summary of completed work
Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running `/speckit.tasks` first to regenerate the task list.
+89
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
---
description: Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
handoffs:
- label: Create Tasks
agent: speckit.tasks
prompt: Break the plan into tasks
send: true
- label: Create Checklist
agent: speckit.checklist
prompt: Create a checklist for the following domain...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
- Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
- Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
- Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
- Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
- Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
- Phase 1: Update agent context by running the agent script
- Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
4. **Stop and report**: Command ends after Phase 2 planning. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
## Phases
### Phase 0: Outline & Research
1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
- For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
- For each dependency → best practices task
- For each integration → patterns task
2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
```text
For each unknown in Technical Context:
Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
For each technology choice:
Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
```
3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
- Decision: [what was chosen]
- Rationale: [why chosen]
- Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
### Phase 1: Design & Contracts
**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
- Entity name, fields, relationships
- Validation rules from requirements
- State transitions if applicable
2. **Generate API contracts** from functional requirements:
- For each user action → endpoint
- Use standard REST/GraphQL patterns
- Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to `/contracts/`
3. **Agent context update**:
- Run `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh opencode`
- These scripts detect which AI agent is in use
- Update the appropriate agent-specific context file
- Add only new technology from current plan
- Preserve manual additions between markers
**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, agent-specific file
## Key rules
- Use absolute paths
- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications
+258
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
---
description: Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
handoffs:
- label: Build Technical Plan
agent: speckit.plan
prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
- label: Clarify Spec Requirements
agent: speckit.clarify
prompt: Clarify specification requirements
send: true
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
The text the user typed after `/speckit.specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
Given that feature description, do this:
1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the branch:
- Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
- Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
- Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
- Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
- Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
- Examples:
- "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
- "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
- "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
- "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
2. **Check for existing branches before creating new one**:
a. First, fetch all remote branches to ensure we have the latest information:
```bash
git fetch --all --prune
```
b. Find the highest feature number across all sources for the short-name:
- Remote branches: `git ls-remote --heads origin | grep -E 'refs/heads/[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
- Local branches: `git branch | grep -E '^[* ]*[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
- Specs directories: Check for directories matching `specs/[0-9]+-<short-name>`
c. Determine the next available number:
- Extract all numbers from all three sources
- Find the highest number N
- Use N+1 for the new branch number
d. Run the script `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS"` with the calculated number and short-name:
- Pass `--number N+1` and `--short-name "your-short-name"` along with the feature description
- Bash example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" --json --number 5 --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
- PowerShell example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Number 5 -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
**IMPORTANT**:
- Check all three sources (remote branches, local branches, specs directories) to find the highest number
- Only match branches/directories with the exact short-name pattern
- If no existing branches/directories found with this short-name, start with number 1
- You must only ever run this script once per feature
- The JSON is provided in the terminal as output - always refer to it to get the actual content you're looking for
- The JSON output will contain BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE paths
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot")
3. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
4. Follow this execution flow:
1. Parse user description from Input
If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
2. Extract key concepts from description
Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
3. For unclear aspects:
- Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
- Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
- The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
- Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
- No reasonable default exists
- **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
- Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
5. Generate Functional Requirements
Each requirement must be testable
Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
6. Define Success Criteria
Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
5. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
6. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
```markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: [DATE]
**Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
## Content Quality
- [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
- [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [ ] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
- [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [ ] Edge cases are identified
- [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
- [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
## Notes
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
```
b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
- For each item, determine if it passes or fails
- Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
c. **Handle Validation Results**:
- **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 6
- **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
1. List the failing items and specific issues
2. Update the spec to address each issue
3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
- **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
```markdown
## Question [N]: [Topic]
**Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
**What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
**Suggested Answers**:
| Option | Answer | Implications |
|--------|--------|--------------|
| A | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| B | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| C | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
**Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
```
4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
- Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
- Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
- Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
- Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
7. Report completion with branch name, spec file path, checklist results, and readiness for the next phase (`/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`).
**NOTE:** The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
## General Guidelines
## Quick Guidelines
- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
### Section Requirements
- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
### For AI Generation
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
- Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
- Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
- Lack any reasonable default
4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
- Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
- User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
- Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
- Integration patterns: RESTful APIs unless specified otherwise
### Success Criteria Guidelines
Success criteria must be:
1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
**Good examples**:
- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)
+137
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
---
description: Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
handoffs:
- label: Analyze For Consistency
agent: speckit.analyze
prompt: Run a project analysis for consistency
send: true
- label: Implement Project
agent: speckit.implement
prompt: Start the implementation in phases
send: true
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
- **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (API endpoints), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
- Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
- Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
- Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
- If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
- If contracts/ exists: Map endpoints to user stories
- If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
- Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
- Create parallel execution examples per user story
- Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
4. **Generate tasks.md**: Use `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` as structure, fill with:
- Correct feature name from plan.md
- Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
- Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
- Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
- Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
- Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
- All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Clear file paths for each task
- Dependencies section showing story completion order
- Parallel execution examples per story
- Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
5. **Report**: Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
- Total task count
- Task count per user story
- Parallel opportunities identified
- Independent test criteria for each story
- Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
- Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
## Task Generation Rules
**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
```text
- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
```
**Format Components**:
1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
- Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
- Setup phase: NO story label
- Foundational phase: NO story label
- User Story phases: MUST have story label
- Polish phase: NO story label
5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
**Examples**:
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
### Task Organization
1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
- Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
- Map all related components to their story:
- Models needed for that story
- Services needed for that story
- Endpoints/UI needed for that story
- If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
- Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
2. **From Contracts**:
- Map each contract/endpoint → to the user story it serves
- If tests requested: Each contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
3. **From Data Model**:
- Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
- If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
- Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
- Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
- Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
- Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
### Phase Structure
- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
- Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
- Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
---
description: Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.
tools: ['github/github-mcp-server/issue_write']
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
1. Get the Git remote by running:
```bash
git config --get remote.origin.url
```
> [!CAUTION]
> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
> [!CAUTION]
> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
+166
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Consolidated prerequisite checking script
#
# This script provides unified prerequisite checking for Spec-Driven Development workflow.
# It replaces the functionality previously spread across multiple scripts.
#
# Usage: ./check-prerequisites.sh [OPTIONS]
#
# OPTIONS:
# --json Output in JSON format
# --require-tasks Require tasks.md to exist (for implementation phase)
# --include-tasks Include tasks.md in AVAILABLE_DOCS list
# --paths-only Only output path variables (no validation)
# --help, -h Show help message
#
# OUTPUTS:
# JSON mode: {"FEATURE_DIR":"...", "AVAILABLE_DOCS":["..."]}
# Text mode: FEATURE_DIR:... \n AVAILABLE_DOCS: \n ✓/✗ file.md
# Paths only: REPO_ROOT: ... \n BRANCH: ... \n FEATURE_DIR: ... etc.
set -e
# Parse command line arguments
JSON_MODE=false
REQUIRE_TASKS=false
INCLUDE_TASKS=false
PATHS_ONLY=false
for arg in "$@"; do
case "$arg" in
--json)
JSON_MODE=true
;;
--require-tasks)
REQUIRE_TASKS=true
;;
--include-tasks)
INCLUDE_TASKS=true
;;
--paths-only)
PATHS_ONLY=true
;;
--help|-h)
cat << 'EOF'
Usage: check-prerequisites.sh [OPTIONS]
Consolidated prerequisite checking for Spec-Driven Development workflow.
OPTIONS:
--json Output in JSON format
--require-tasks Require tasks.md to exist (for implementation phase)
--include-tasks Include tasks.md in AVAILABLE_DOCS list
--paths-only Only output path variables (no prerequisite validation)
--help, -h Show this help message
EXAMPLES:
# Check task prerequisites (plan.md required)
./check-prerequisites.sh --json
# Check implementation prerequisites (plan.md + tasks.md required)
./check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks
# Get feature paths only (no validation)
./check-prerequisites.sh --paths-only
EOF
exit 0
;;
*)
echo "ERROR: Unknown option '$arg'. Use --help for usage information." >&2
exit 1
;;
esac
done
# Source common functions
SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
# Get feature paths and validate branch
eval $(get_feature_paths)
check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" "$HAS_GIT" || exit 1
# If paths-only mode, output paths and exit (support JSON + paths-only combined)
if $PATHS_ONLY; then
if $JSON_MODE; then
# Minimal JSON paths payload (no validation performed)
printf '{"REPO_ROOT":"%s","BRANCH":"%s","FEATURE_DIR":"%s","FEATURE_SPEC":"%s","IMPL_PLAN":"%s","TASKS":"%s"}\n' \
"$REPO_ROOT" "$CURRENT_BRANCH" "$FEATURE_DIR" "$FEATURE_SPEC" "$IMPL_PLAN" "$TASKS"
else
echo "REPO_ROOT: $REPO_ROOT"
echo "BRANCH: $CURRENT_BRANCH"
echo "FEATURE_DIR: $FEATURE_DIR"
echo "FEATURE_SPEC: $FEATURE_SPEC"
echo "IMPL_PLAN: $IMPL_PLAN"
echo "TASKS: $TASKS"
fi
exit 0
fi
# Validate required directories and files
if [[ ! -d "$FEATURE_DIR" ]]; then
echo "ERROR: Feature directory not found: $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
echo "Run /speckit.specify first to create the feature structure." >&2
exit 1
fi
if [[ ! -f "$IMPL_PLAN" ]]; then
echo "ERROR: plan.md not found in $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
echo "Run /speckit.plan first to create the implementation plan." >&2
exit 1
fi
# Check for tasks.md if required
if $REQUIRE_TASKS && [[ ! -f "$TASKS" ]]; then
echo "ERROR: tasks.md not found in $FEATURE_DIR" >&2
echo "Run /speckit.tasks first to create the task list." >&2
exit 1
fi
# Build list of available documents
docs=()
# Always check these optional docs
[[ -f "$RESEARCH" ]] && docs+=("research.md")
[[ -f "$DATA_MODEL" ]] && docs+=("data-model.md")
# Check contracts directory (only if it exists and has files)
if [[ -d "$CONTRACTS_DIR" ]] && [[ -n "$(ls -A "$CONTRACTS_DIR" 2>/dev/null)" ]]; then
docs+=("contracts/")
fi
[[ -f "$QUICKSTART" ]] && docs+=("quickstart.md")
# Include tasks.md if requested and it exists
if $INCLUDE_TASKS && [[ -f "$TASKS" ]]; then
docs+=("tasks.md")
fi
# Output results
if $JSON_MODE; then
# Build JSON array of documents
if [[ ${#docs[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
json_docs="[]"
else
json_docs=$(printf '"%s",' "${docs[@]}")
json_docs="[${json_docs%,}]"
fi
printf '{"FEATURE_DIR":"%s","AVAILABLE_DOCS":%s}\n' "$FEATURE_DIR" "$json_docs"
else
# Text output
echo "FEATURE_DIR:$FEATURE_DIR"
echo "AVAILABLE_DOCS:"
# Show status of each potential document
check_file "$RESEARCH" "research.md"
check_file "$DATA_MODEL" "data-model.md"
check_dir "$CONTRACTS_DIR" "contracts/"
check_file "$QUICKSTART" "quickstart.md"
if $INCLUDE_TASKS; then
check_file "$TASKS" "tasks.md"
fi
fi
+156
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,156 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Common functions and variables for all scripts
# Get repository root, with fallback for non-git repositories
get_repo_root() {
if git rev-parse --show-toplevel >/dev/null 2>&1; then
git rev-parse --show-toplevel
else
# Fall back to script location for non-git repos
local script_dir="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
(cd "$script_dir/../../.." && pwd)
fi
}
# Get current branch, with fallback for non-git repositories
get_current_branch() {
# First check if SPECIFY_FEATURE environment variable is set
if [[ -n "${SPECIFY_FEATURE:-}" ]]; then
echo "$SPECIFY_FEATURE"
return
fi
# Then check git if available
if git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD >/dev/null 2>&1; then
git rev-parse --abbrev-ref HEAD
return
fi
# For non-git repos, try to find the latest feature directory
local repo_root=$(get_repo_root)
local specs_dir="$repo_root/specs"
if [[ -d "$specs_dir" ]]; then
local latest_feature=""
local highest=0
for dir in "$specs_dir"/*; do
if [[ -d "$dir" ]]; then
local dirname=$(basename "$dir")
if [[ "$dirname" =~ ^([0-9]{3})- ]]; then
local number=${BASH_REMATCH[1]}
number=$((10#$number))
if [[ "$number" -gt "$highest" ]]; then
highest=$number
latest_feature=$dirname
fi
fi
fi
done
if [[ -n "$latest_feature" ]]; then
echo "$latest_feature"
return
fi
fi
echo "main" # Final fallback
}
# Check if we have git available
has_git() {
git rev-parse --show-toplevel >/dev/null 2>&1
}
check_feature_branch() {
local branch="$1"
local has_git_repo="$2"
# For non-git repos, we can't enforce branch naming but still provide output
if [[ "$has_git_repo" != "true" ]]; then
echo "[specify] Warning: Git repository not detected; skipped branch validation" >&2
return 0
fi
if [[ ! "$branch" =~ ^[0-9]{3}- ]]; then
echo "ERROR: Not on a feature branch. Current branch: $branch" >&2
echo "Feature branches should be named like: 001-feature-name" >&2
return 1
fi
return 0
}
get_feature_dir() { echo "$1/specs/$2"; }
# Find feature directory by numeric prefix instead of exact branch match
# This allows multiple branches to work on the same spec (e.g., 004-fix-bug, 004-add-feature)
find_feature_dir_by_prefix() {
local repo_root="$1"
local branch_name="$2"
local specs_dir="$repo_root/specs"
# Extract numeric prefix from branch (e.g., "004" from "004-whatever")
if [[ ! "$branch_name" =~ ^([0-9]{3})- ]]; then
# If branch doesn't have numeric prefix, fall back to exact match
echo "$specs_dir/$branch_name"
return
fi
local prefix="${BASH_REMATCH[1]}"
# Search for directories in specs/ that start with this prefix
local matches=()
if [[ -d "$specs_dir" ]]; then
for dir in "$specs_dir"/"$prefix"-*; do
if [[ -d "$dir" ]]; then
matches+=("$(basename "$dir")")
fi
done
fi
# Handle results
if [[ ${#matches[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
# No match found - return the branch name path (will fail later with clear error)
echo "$specs_dir/$branch_name"
elif [[ ${#matches[@]} -eq 1 ]]; then
# Exactly one match - perfect!
echo "$specs_dir/${matches[0]}"
else
# Multiple matches - this shouldn't happen with proper naming convention
echo "ERROR: Multiple spec directories found with prefix '$prefix': ${matches[*]}" >&2
echo "Please ensure only one spec directory exists per numeric prefix." >&2
echo "$specs_dir/$branch_name" # Return something to avoid breaking the script
fi
}
get_feature_paths() {
local repo_root=$(get_repo_root)
local current_branch=$(get_current_branch)
local has_git_repo="false"
if has_git; then
has_git_repo="true"
fi
# Use prefix-based lookup to support multiple branches per spec
local feature_dir=$(find_feature_dir_by_prefix "$repo_root" "$current_branch")
cat <<EOF
REPO_ROOT='$repo_root'
CURRENT_BRANCH='$current_branch'
HAS_GIT='$has_git_repo'
FEATURE_DIR='$feature_dir'
FEATURE_SPEC='$feature_dir/spec.md'
IMPL_PLAN='$feature_dir/plan.md'
TASKS='$feature_dir/tasks.md'
RESEARCH='$feature_dir/research.md'
DATA_MODEL='$feature_dir/data-model.md'
QUICKSTART='$feature_dir/quickstart.md'
CONTRACTS_DIR='$feature_dir/contracts'
EOF
}
check_file() { [[ -f "$1" ]] && echo "$2" || echo "$2"; }
check_dir() { [[ -d "$1" && -n $(ls -A "$1" 2>/dev/null) ]] && echo "$2" || echo "$2"; }
+297
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,297 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
JSON_MODE=false
SHORT_NAME=""
BRANCH_NUMBER=""
ARGS=()
i=1
while [ $i -le $# ]; do
arg="${!i}"
case "$arg" in
--json)
JSON_MODE=true
;;
--short-name)
if [ $((i + 1)) -gt $# ]; then
echo 'Error: --short-name requires a value' >&2
exit 1
fi
i=$((i + 1))
next_arg="${!i}"
# Check if the next argument is another option (starts with --)
if [[ "$next_arg" == --* ]]; then
echo 'Error: --short-name requires a value' >&2
exit 1
fi
SHORT_NAME="$next_arg"
;;
--number)
if [ $((i + 1)) -gt $# ]; then
echo 'Error: --number requires a value' >&2
exit 1
fi
i=$((i + 1))
next_arg="${!i}"
if [[ "$next_arg" == --* ]]; then
echo 'Error: --number requires a value' >&2
exit 1
fi
BRANCH_NUMBER="$next_arg"
;;
--help|-h)
echo "Usage: $0 [--json] [--short-name <name>] [--number N] <feature_description>"
echo ""
echo "Options:"
echo " --json Output in JSON format"
echo " --short-name <name> Provide a custom short name (2-4 words) for the branch"
echo " --number N Specify branch number manually (overrides auto-detection)"
echo " --help, -h Show this help message"
echo ""
echo "Examples:"
echo " $0 'Add user authentication system' --short-name 'user-auth'"
echo " $0 'Implement OAuth2 integration for API' --number 5"
exit 0
;;
*)
ARGS+=("$arg")
;;
esac
i=$((i + 1))
done
FEATURE_DESCRIPTION="${ARGS[*]}"
if [ -z "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION" ]; then
echo "Usage: $0 [--json] [--short-name <name>] [--number N] <feature_description>" >&2
exit 1
fi
# Function to find the repository root by searching for existing project markers
find_repo_root() {
local dir="$1"
while [ "$dir" != "/" ]; do
if [ -d "$dir/.git" ] || [ -d "$dir/.specify" ]; then
echo "$dir"
return 0
fi
dir="$(dirname "$dir")"
done
return 1
}
# Function to get highest number from specs directory
get_highest_from_specs() {
local specs_dir="$1"
local highest=0
if [ -d "$specs_dir" ]; then
for dir in "$specs_dir"/*; do
[ -d "$dir" ] || continue
dirname=$(basename "$dir")
number=$(echo "$dirname" | grep -o '^[0-9]\+' || echo "0")
number=$((10#$number))
if [ "$number" -gt "$highest" ]; then
highest=$number
fi
done
fi
echo "$highest"
}
# Function to get highest number from git branches
get_highest_from_branches() {
local highest=0
# Get all branches (local and remote)
branches=$(git branch -a 2>/dev/null || echo "")
if [ -n "$branches" ]; then
while IFS= read -r branch; do
# Clean branch name: remove leading markers and remote prefixes
clean_branch=$(echo "$branch" | sed 's/^[* ]*//; s|^remotes/[^/]*/||')
# Extract feature number if branch matches pattern ###-*
if echo "$clean_branch" | grep -q '^[0-9]\{3\}-'; then
number=$(echo "$clean_branch" | grep -o '^[0-9]\{3\}' || echo "0")
number=$((10#$number))
if [ "$number" -gt "$highest" ]; then
highest=$number
fi
fi
done <<< "$branches"
fi
echo "$highest"
}
# Function to check existing branches (local and remote) and return next available number
check_existing_branches() {
local specs_dir="$1"
# Fetch all remotes to get latest branch info (suppress errors if no remotes)
git fetch --all --prune 2>/dev/null || true
# Get highest number from ALL branches (not just matching short name)
local highest_branch=$(get_highest_from_branches)
# Get highest number from ALL specs (not just matching short name)
local highest_spec=$(get_highest_from_specs "$specs_dir")
# Take the maximum of both
local max_num=$highest_branch
if [ "$highest_spec" -gt "$max_num" ]; then
max_num=$highest_spec
fi
# Return next number
echo $((max_num + 1))
}
# Function to clean and format a branch name
clean_branch_name() {
local name="$1"
echo "$name" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed 's/[^a-z0-9]/-/g' | sed 's/-\+/-/g' | sed 's/^-//' | sed 's/-$//'
}
# Resolve repository root. Prefer git information when available, but fall back
# to searching for repository markers so the workflow still functions in repositories that
# were initialised with --no-git.
SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
if git rev-parse --show-toplevel >/dev/null 2>&1; then
REPO_ROOT=$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)
HAS_GIT=true
else
REPO_ROOT="$(find_repo_root "$SCRIPT_DIR")"
if [ -z "$REPO_ROOT" ]; then
echo "Error: Could not determine repository root. Please run this script from within the repository." >&2
exit 1
fi
HAS_GIT=false
fi
cd "$REPO_ROOT"
SPECS_DIR="$REPO_ROOT/specs"
mkdir -p "$SPECS_DIR"
# Function to generate branch name with stop word filtering and length filtering
generate_branch_name() {
local description="$1"
# Common stop words to filter out
local stop_words="^(i|a|an|the|to|for|of|in|on|at|by|with|from|is|are|was|were|be|been|being|have|has|had|do|does|did|will|would|should|could|can|may|might|must|shall|this|that|these|those|my|your|our|their|want|need|add|get|set)$"
# Convert to lowercase and split into words
local clean_name=$(echo "$description" | tr '[:upper:]' '[:lower:]' | sed 's/[^a-z0-9]/ /g')
# Filter words: remove stop words and words shorter than 3 chars (unless they're uppercase acronyms in original)
local meaningful_words=()
for word in $clean_name; do
# Skip empty words
[ -z "$word" ] && continue
# Keep words that are NOT stop words AND (length >= 3 OR are potential acronyms)
if ! echo "$word" | grep -qiE "$stop_words"; then
if [ ${#word} -ge 3 ]; then
meaningful_words+=("$word")
elif echo "$description" | grep -q "\b${word^^}\b"; then
# Keep short words if they appear as uppercase in original (likely acronyms)
meaningful_words+=("$word")
fi
fi
done
# If we have meaningful words, use first 3-4 of them
if [ ${#meaningful_words[@]} -gt 0 ]; then
local max_words=3
if [ ${#meaningful_words[@]} -eq 4 ]; then max_words=4; fi
local result=""
local count=0
for word in "${meaningful_words[@]}"; do
if [ $count -ge $max_words ]; then break; fi
if [ -n "$result" ]; then result="$result-"; fi
result="$result$word"
count=$((count + 1))
done
echo "$result"
else
# Fallback to original logic if no meaningful words found
local cleaned=$(clean_branch_name "$description")
echo "$cleaned" | tr '-' '\n' | grep -v '^$' | head -3 | tr '\n' '-' | sed 's/-$//'
fi
}
# Generate branch name
if [ -n "$SHORT_NAME" ]; then
# Use provided short name, just clean it up
BRANCH_SUFFIX=$(clean_branch_name "$SHORT_NAME")
else
# Generate from description with smart filtering
BRANCH_SUFFIX=$(generate_branch_name "$FEATURE_DESCRIPTION")
fi
# Determine branch number
if [ -z "$BRANCH_NUMBER" ]; then
if [ "$HAS_GIT" = true ]; then
# Check existing branches on remotes
BRANCH_NUMBER=$(check_existing_branches "$SPECS_DIR")
else
# Fall back to local directory check
HIGHEST=$(get_highest_from_specs "$SPECS_DIR")
BRANCH_NUMBER=$((HIGHEST + 1))
fi
fi
# Force base-10 interpretation to prevent octal conversion (e.g., 010 → 8 in octal, but should be 10 in decimal)
FEATURE_NUM=$(printf "%03d" "$((10#$BRANCH_NUMBER))")
BRANCH_NAME="${FEATURE_NUM}-${BRANCH_SUFFIX}"
# GitHub enforces a 244-byte limit on branch names
# Validate and truncate if necessary
MAX_BRANCH_LENGTH=244
if [ ${#BRANCH_NAME} -gt $MAX_BRANCH_LENGTH ]; then
# Calculate how much we need to trim from suffix
# Account for: feature number (3) + hyphen (1) = 4 chars
MAX_SUFFIX_LENGTH=$((MAX_BRANCH_LENGTH - 4))
# Truncate suffix at word boundary if possible
TRUNCATED_SUFFIX=$(echo "$BRANCH_SUFFIX" | cut -c1-$MAX_SUFFIX_LENGTH)
# Remove trailing hyphen if truncation created one
TRUNCATED_SUFFIX=$(echo "$TRUNCATED_SUFFIX" | sed 's/-$//')
ORIGINAL_BRANCH_NAME="$BRANCH_NAME"
BRANCH_NAME="${FEATURE_NUM}-${TRUNCATED_SUFFIX}"
>&2 echo "[specify] Warning: Branch name exceeded GitHub's 244-byte limit"
>&2 echo "[specify] Original: $ORIGINAL_BRANCH_NAME (${#ORIGINAL_BRANCH_NAME} bytes)"
>&2 echo "[specify] Truncated to: $BRANCH_NAME (${#BRANCH_NAME} bytes)"
fi
if [ "$HAS_GIT" = true ]; then
git checkout -b "$BRANCH_NAME"
else
>&2 echo "[specify] Warning: Git repository not detected; skipped branch creation for $BRANCH_NAME"
fi
FEATURE_DIR="$SPECS_DIR/$BRANCH_NAME"
mkdir -p "$FEATURE_DIR"
TEMPLATE="$REPO_ROOT/.specify/templates/spec-template.md"
SPEC_FILE="$FEATURE_DIR/spec.md"
if [ -f "$TEMPLATE" ]; then cp "$TEMPLATE" "$SPEC_FILE"; else touch "$SPEC_FILE"; fi
# Set the SPECIFY_FEATURE environment variable for the current session
export SPECIFY_FEATURE="$BRANCH_NAME"
if $JSON_MODE; then
printf '{"BRANCH_NAME":"%s","SPEC_FILE":"%s","FEATURE_NUM":"%s"}\n' "$BRANCH_NAME" "$SPEC_FILE" "$FEATURE_NUM"
else
echo "BRANCH_NAME: $BRANCH_NAME"
echo "SPEC_FILE: $SPEC_FILE"
echo "FEATURE_NUM: $FEATURE_NUM"
echo "SPECIFY_FEATURE environment variable set to: $BRANCH_NAME"
fi
+61
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
set -e
# Parse command line arguments
JSON_MODE=false
ARGS=()
for arg in "$@"; do
case "$arg" in
--json)
JSON_MODE=true
;;
--help|-h)
echo "Usage: $0 [--json]"
echo " --json Output results in JSON format"
echo " --help Show this help message"
exit 0
;;
*)
ARGS+=("$arg")
;;
esac
done
# Get script directory and load common functions
SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
# Get all paths and variables from common functions
eval $(get_feature_paths)
# Check if we're on a proper feature branch (only for git repos)
check_feature_branch "$CURRENT_BRANCH" "$HAS_GIT" || exit 1
# Ensure the feature directory exists
mkdir -p "$FEATURE_DIR"
# Copy plan template if it exists
TEMPLATE="$REPO_ROOT/.specify/templates/plan-template.md"
if [[ -f "$TEMPLATE" ]]; then
cp "$TEMPLATE" "$IMPL_PLAN"
echo "Copied plan template to $IMPL_PLAN"
else
echo "Warning: Plan template not found at $TEMPLATE"
# Create a basic plan file if template doesn't exist
touch "$IMPL_PLAN"
fi
# Output results
if $JSON_MODE; then
printf '{"FEATURE_SPEC":"%s","IMPL_PLAN":"%s","SPECS_DIR":"%s","BRANCH":"%s","HAS_GIT":"%s"}\n' \
"$FEATURE_SPEC" "$IMPL_PLAN" "$FEATURE_DIR" "$CURRENT_BRANCH" "$HAS_GIT"
else
echo "FEATURE_SPEC: $FEATURE_SPEC"
echo "IMPL_PLAN: $IMPL_PLAN"
echo "SPECS_DIR: $FEATURE_DIR"
echo "BRANCH: $CURRENT_BRANCH"
echo "HAS_GIT: $HAS_GIT"
fi
+808
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,808 @@
#!/usr/bin/env bash
# Update agent context files with information from plan.md
#
# This script maintains AI agent context files by parsing feature specifications
# and updating agent-specific configuration files with project information.
#
# MAIN FUNCTIONS:
# 1. Environment Validation
# - Verifies git repository structure and branch information
# - Checks for required plan.md files and templates
# - Validates file permissions and accessibility
#
# 2. Plan Data Extraction
# - Parses plan.md files to extract project metadata
# - Identifies language/version, frameworks, databases, and project types
# - Handles missing or incomplete specification data gracefully
#
# 3. Agent File Management
# - Creates new agent context files from templates when needed
# - Updates existing agent files with new project information
# - Preserves manual additions and custom configurations
# - Supports multiple AI agent formats and directory structures
#
# 4. Content Generation
# - Generates language-specific build/test commands
# - Creates appropriate project directory structures
# - Updates technology stacks and recent changes sections
# - Maintains consistent formatting and timestamps
#
# 5. Multi-Agent Support
# - Handles agent-specific file paths and naming conventions
# - Supports: Claude, Gemini, Copilot, Cursor, Qwen, opencode, Codex, Windsurf, Kilo Code, Auggie CLI, Roo Code, CodeBuddy CLI, Qoder CLI, Amp, SHAI, Amazon Q Developer CLI, or Antigravity
# - Can update single agents or all existing agent files
# - Creates default Claude file if no agent files exist
#
# Usage: ./update-agent-context.sh [agent_type]
# Agent types: claude|gemini|copilot|cursor-agent|qwen|opencode|codex|windsurf|kilocode|auggie|shai|q|agy|bob|qoder
# Leave empty to update all existing agent files
set -e
# Enable strict error handling
set -u
set -o pipefail
#==============================================================================
# Configuration and Global Variables
#==============================================================================
# Get script directory and load common functions
SCRIPT_DIR="$(CDPATH="" cd "$(dirname "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}")" && pwd)"
source "$SCRIPT_DIR/common.sh"
# Get all paths and variables from common functions
eval $(get_feature_paths)
NEW_PLAN="$IMPL_PLAN" # Alias for compatibility with existing code
AGENT_TYPE="${1:-}"
# Agent-specific file paths
CLAUDE_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/CLAUDE.md"
GEMINI_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/GEMINI.md"
COPILOT_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.github/agents/copilot-instructions.md"
CURSOR_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.cursor/rules/specify-rules.mdc"
QWEN_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/QWEN.md"
AGENTS_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/AGENTS.md"
WINDSURF_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.windsurf/rules/specify-rules.md"
KILOCODE_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.kilocode/rules/specify-rules.md"
AUGGIE_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.augment/rules/specify-rules.md"
ROO_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.roo/rules/specify-rules.md"
CODEBUDDY_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/CODEBUDDY.md"
QODER_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/QODER.md"
AMP_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/AGENTS.md"
SHAI_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/SHAI.md"
Q_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/AGENTS.md"
AGY_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.agent/rules/specify-rules.md"
BOB_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/AGENTS.md"
# Template file
TEMPLATE_FILE="$REPO_ROOT/.specify/templates/agent-file-template.md"
# Global variables for parsed plan data
NEW_LANG=""
NEW_FRAMEWORK=""
NEW_DB=""
NEW_PROJECT_TYPE=""
#==============================================================================
# Utility Functions
#==============================================================================
log_info() {
echo "INFO: $1"
}
log_success() {
echo "$1"
}
log_error() {
echo "ERROR: $1" >&2
}
log_warning() {
echo "WARNING: $1" >&2
}
# Cleanup function for temporary files
cleanup() {
local exit_code=$?
rm -f /tmp/agent_update_*_$$
rm -f /tmp/manual_additions_$$
exit $exit_code
}
# Set up cleanup trap
trap cleanup EXIT INT TERM
#==============================================================================
# Validation Functions
#==============================================================================
validate_environment() {
# Check if we have a current branch/feature (git or non-git)
if [[ -z "$CURRENT_BRANCH" ]]; then
log_error "Unable to determine current feature"
if [[ "$HAS_GIT" == "true" ]]; then
log_info "Make sure you're on a feature branch"
else
log_info "Set SPECIFY_FEATURE environment variable or create a feature first"
fi
exit 1
fi
# Check if plan.md exists
if [[ ! -f "$NEW_PLAN" ]]; then
log_error "No plan.md found at $NEW_PLAN"
log_info "Make sure you're working on a feature with a corresponding spec directory"
if [[ "$HAS_GIT" != "true" ]]; then
log_info "Use: export SPECIFY_FEATURE=your-feature-name or create a new feature first"
fi
exit 1
fi
# Check if template exists (needed for new files)
if [[ ! -f "$TEMPLATE_FILE" ]]; then
log_warning "Template file not found at $TEMPLATE_FILE"
log_warning "Creating new agent files will fail"
fi
}
#==============================================================================
# Plan Parsing Functions
#==============================================================================
extract_plan_field() {
local field_pattern="$1"
local plan_file="$2"
grep "^\*\*${field_pattern}\*\*: " "$plan_file" 2>/dev/null | \
head -1 | \
sed "s|^\*\*${field_pattern}\*\*: ||" | \
sed 's/^[ \t]*//;s/[ \t]*$//' | \
grep -v "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" | \
grep -v "^N/A$" || echo ""
}
parse_plan_data() {
local plan_file="$1"
if [[ ! -f "$plan_file" ]]; then
log_error "Plan file not found: $plan_file"
return 1
fi
if [[ ! -r "$plan_file" ]]; then
log_error "Plan file is not readable: $plan_file"
return 1
fi
log_info "Parsing plan data from $plan_file"
NEW_LANG=$(extract_plan_field "Language/Version" "$plan_file")
NEW_FRAMEWORK=$(extract_plan_field "Primary Dependencies" "$plan_file")
NEW_DB=$(extract_plan_field "Storage" "$plan_file")
NEW_PROJECT_TYPE=$(extract_plan_field "Project Type" "$plan_file")
# Log what we found
if [[ -n "$NEW_LANG" ]]; then
log_info "Found language: $NEW_LANG"
else
log_warning "No language information found in plan"
fi
if [[ -n "$NEW_FRAMEWORK" ]]; then
log_info "Found framework: $NEW_FRAMEWORK"
fi
if [[ -n "$NEW_DB" ]] && [[ "$NEW_DB" != "N/A" ]]; then
log_info "Found database: $NEW_DB"
fi
if [[ -n "$NEW_PROJECT_TYPE" ]]; then
log_info "Found project type: $NEW_PROJECT_TYPE"
fi
}
format_technology_stack() {
local lang="$1"
local framework="$2"
local parts=()
# Add non-empty parts
[[ -n "$lang" && "$lang" != "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" ]] && parts+=("$lang")
[[ -n "$framework" && "$framework" != "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" && "$framework" != "N/A" ]] && parts+=("$framework")
# Join with proper formatting
if [[ ${#parts[@]} -eq 0 ]]; then
echo ""
elif [[ ${#parts[@]} -eq 1 ]]; then
echo "${parts[0]}"
else
# Join multiple parts with " + "
local result="${parts[0]}"
for ((i=1; i<${#parts[@]}; i++)); do
result="$result + ${parts[i]}"
done
echo "$result"
fi
}
#==============================================================================
# Template and Content Generation Functions
#==============================================================================
get_project_structure() {
local project_type="$1"
if [[ "$project_type" == *"web"* ]]; then
echo "backend/\\nfrontend/\\ntests/"
else
echo "src/\\ntests/"
fi
}
get_commands_for_language() {
local lang="$1"
case "$lang" in
*"Python"*)
echo "cd src && pytest && ruff check ."
;;
*"Rust"*)
echo "cargo test && cargo clippy"
;;
*"JavaScript"*|*"TypeScript"*)
echo "npm test \\&\\& npm run lint"
;;
*)
echo "# Add commands for $lang"
;;
esac
}
get_language_conventions() {
local lang="$1"
echo "$lang: Follow standard conventions"
}
create_new_agent_file() {
local target_file="$1"
local temp_file="$2"
local project_name="$3"
local current_date="$4"
if [[ ! -f "$TEMPLATE_FILE" ]]; then
log_error "Template not found at $TEMPLATE_FILE"
return 1
fi
if [[ ! -r "$TEMPLATE_FILE" ]]; then
log_error "Template file is not readable: $TEMPLATE_FILE"
return 1
fi
log_info "Creating new agent context file from template..."
if ! cp "$TEMPLATE_FILE" "$temp_file"; then
log_error "Failed to copy template file"
return 1
fi
# Replace template placeholders
local project_structure
project_structure=$(get_project_structure "$NEW_PROJECT_TYPE")
local commands
commands=$(get_commands_for_language "$NEW_LANG")
local language_conventions
language_conventions=$(get_language_conventions "$NEW_LANG")
# Perform substitutions with error checking using safer approach
# Escape special characters for sed by using a different delimiter or escaping
local escaped_lang=$(printf '%s\n' "$NEW_LANG" | sed 's/[\[\.*^$()+{}|]/\\&/g')
local escaped_framework=$(printf '%s\n' "$NEW_FRAMEWORK" | sed 's/[\[\.*^$()+{}|]/\\&/g')
local escaped_branch=$(printf '%s\n' "$CURRENT_BRANCH" | sed 's/[\[\.*^$()+{}|]/\\&/g')
# Build technology stack and recent change strings conditionally
local tech_stack
if [[ -n "$escaped_lang" && -n "$escaped_framework" ]]; then
tech_stack="- $escaped_lang + $escaped_framework ($escaped_branch)"
elif [[ -n "$escaped_lang" ]]; then
tech_stack="- $escaped_lang ($escaped_branch)"
elif [[ -n "$escaped_framework" ]]; then
tech_stack="- $escaped_framework ($escaped_branch)"
else
tech_stack="- ($escaped_branch)"
fi
local recent_change
if [[ -n "$escaped_lang" && -n "$escaped_framework" ]]; then
recent_change="- $escaped_branch: Added $escaped_lang + $escaped_framework"
elif [[ -n "$escaped_lang" ]]; then
recent_change="- $escaped_branch: Added $escaped_lang"
elif [[ -n "$escaped_framework" ]]; then
recent_change="- $escaped_branch: Added $escaped_framework"
else
recent_change="- $escaped_branch: Added"
fi
local substitutions=(
"s|\[PROJECT NAME\]|$project_name|"
"s|\[DATE\]|$current_date|"
"s|\[EXTRACTED FROM ALL PLAN.MD FILES\]|$tech_stack|"
"s|\[ACTUAL STRUCTURE FROM PLANS\]|$project_structure|g"
"s|\[ONLY COMMANDS FOR ACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES\]|$commands|"
"s|\[LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC, ONLY FOR LANGUAGES IN USE\]|$language_conventions|"
"s|\[LAST 3 FEATURES AND WHAT THEY ADDED\]|$recent_change|"
)
for substitution in "${substitutions[@]}"; do
if ! sed -i.bak -e "$substitution" "$temp_file"; then
log_error "Failed to perform substitution: $substitution"
rm -f "$temp_file" "$temp_file.bak"
return 1
fi
done
# Convert \n sequences to actual newlines
newline=$(printf '\n')
sed -i.bak2 "s/\\\\n/${newline}/g" "$temp_file"
# Clean up backup files
rm -f "$temp_file.bak" "$temp_file.bak2"
return 0
}
update_existing_agent_file() {
local target_file="$1"
local current_date="$2"
log_info "Updating existing agent context file..."
# Use a single temporary file for atomic update
local temp_file
temp_file=$(mktemp) || {
log_error "Failed to create temporary file"
return 1
}
# Process the file in one pass
local tech_stack=$(format_technology_stack "$NEW_LANG" "$NEW_FRAMEWORK")
local new_tech_entries=()
local new_change_entry=""
# Prepare new technology entries
if [[ -n "$tech_stack" ]] && ! grep -q "$tech_stack" "$target_file"; then
new_tech_entries+=("- $tech_stack ($CURRENT_BRANCH)")
fi
if [[ -n "$NEW_DB" ]] && [[ "$NEW_DB" != "N/A" ]] && [[ "$NEW_DB" != "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" ]] && ! grep -q "$NEW_DB" "$target_file"; then
new_tech_entries+=("- $NEW_DB ($CURRENT_BRANCH)")
fi
# Prepare new change entry
if [[ -n "$tech_stack" ]]; then
new_change_entry="- $CURRENT_BRANCH: Added $tech_stack"
elif [[ -n "$NEW_DB" ]] && [[ "$NEW_DB" != "N/A" ]] && [[ "$NEW_DB" != "NEEDS CLARIFICATION" ]]; then
new_change_entry="- $CURRENT_BRANCH: Added $NEW_DB"
fi
# Check if sections exist in the file
local has_active_technologies=0
local has_recent_changes=0
if grep -q "^## Active Technologies" "$target_file" 2>/dev/null; then
has_active_technologies=1
fi
if grep -q "^## Recent Changes" "$target_file" 2>/dev/null; then
has_recent_changes=1
fi
# Process file line by line
local in_tech_section=false
local in_changes_section=false
local tech_entries_added=false
local changes_entries_added=false
local existing_changes_count=0
local file_ended=false
while IFS= read -r line || [[ -n "$line" ]]; do
# Handle Active Technologies section
if [[ "$line" == "## Active Technologies" ]]; then
echo "$line" >> "$temp_file"
in_tech_section=true
continue
elif [[ $in_tech_section == true ]] && [[ "$line" =~ ^##[[:space:]] ]]; then
# Add new tech entries before closing the section
if [[ $tech_entries_added == false ]] && [[ ${#new_tech_entries[@]} -gt 0 ]]; then
printf '%s\n' "${new_tech_entries[@]}" >> "$temp_file"
tech_entries_added=true
fi
echo "$line" >> "$temp_file"
in_tech_section=false
continue
elif [[ $in_tech_section == true ]] && [[ -z "$line" ]]; then
# Add new tech entries before empty line in tech section
if [[ $tech_entries_added == false ]] && [[ ${#new_tech_entries[@]} -gt 0 ]]; then
printf '%s\n' "${new_tech_entries[@]}" >> "$temp_file"
tech_entries_added=true
fi
echo "$line" >> "$temp_file"
continue
fi
# Handle Recent Changes section
if [[ "$line" == "## Recent Changes" ]]; then
echo "$line" >> "$temp_file"
# Add new change entry right after the heading
if [[ -n "$new_change_entry" ]]; then
echo "$new_change_entry" >> "$temp_file"
fi
in_changes_section=true
changes_entries_added=true
continue
elif [[ $in_changes_section == true ]] && [[ "$line" =~ ^##[[:space:]] ]]; then
echo "$line" >> "$temp_file"
in_changes_section=false
continue
elif [[ $in_changes_section == true ]] && [[ "$line" == "- "* ]]; then
# Keep only first 2 existing changes
if [[ $existing_changes_count -lt 2 ]]; then
echo "$line" >> "$temp_file"
((existing_changes_count++))
fi
continue
fi
# Update timestamp
if [[ "$line" =~ \*\*Last\ updated\*\*:.*[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-[0-9][0-9]-[0-9][0-9] ]]; then
echo "$line" | sed "s/[0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]-[0-9][0-9]-[0-9][0-9]/$current_date/" >> "$temp_file"
else
echo "$line" >> "$temp_file"
fi
done < "$target_file"
# Post-loop check: if we're still in the Active Technologies section and haven't added new entries
if [[ $in_tech_section == true ]] && [[ $tech_entries_added == false ]] && [[ ${#new_tech_entries[@]} -gt 0 ]]; then
printf '%s\n' "${new_tech_entries[@]}" >> "$temp_file"
tech_entries_added=true
fi
# If sections don't exist, add them at the end of the file
if [[ $has_active_technologies -eq 0 ]] && [[ ${#new_tech_entries[@]} -gt 0 ]]; then
echo "" >> "$temp_file"
echo "## Active Technologies" >> "$temp_file"
printf '%s\n' "${new_tech_entries[@]}" >> "$temp_file"
tech_entries_added=true
fi
if [[ $has_recent_changes -eq 0 ]] && [[ -n "$new_change_entry" ]]; then
echo "" >> "$temp_file"
echo "## Recent Changes" >> "$temp_file"
echo "$new_change_entry" >> "$temp_file"
changes_entries_added=true
fi
# Move temp file to target atomically
if ! mv "$temp_file" "$target_file"; then
log_error "Failed to update target file"
rm -f "$temp_file"
return 1
fi
return 0
}
#==============================================================================
# Main Agent File Update Function
#==============================================================================
update_agent_file() {
local target_file="$1"
local agent_name="$2"
if [[ -z "$target_file" ]] || [[ -z "$agent_name" ]]; then
log_error "update_agent_file requires target_file and agent_name parameters"
return 1
fi
log_info "Updating $agent_name context file: $target_file"
local project_name
project_name=$(basename "$REPO_ROOT")
local current_date
current_date=$(date +%Y-%m-%d)
# Create directory if it doesn't exist
local target_dir
target_dir=$(dirname "$target_file")
if [[ ! -d "$target_dir" ]]; then
if ! mkdir -p "$target_dir"; then
log_error "Failed to create directory: $target_dir"
return 1
fi
fi
if [[ ! -f "$target_file" ]]; then
# Create new file from template
local temp_file
temp_file=$(mktemp) || {
log_error "Failed to create temporary file"
return 1
}
if create_new_agent_file "$target_file" "$temp_file" "$project_name" "$current_date"; then
if mv "$temp_file" "$target_file"; then
log_success "Created new $agent_name context file"
else
log_error "Failed to move temporary file to $target_file"
rm -f "$temp_file"
return 1
fi
else
log_error "Failed to create new agent file"
rm -f "$temp_file"
return 1
fi
else
# Update existing file
if [[ ! -r "$target_file" ]]; then
log_error "Cannot read existing file: $target_file"
return 1
fi
if [[ ! -w "$target_file" ]]; then
log_error "Cannot write to existing file: $target_file"
return 1
fi
if update_existing_agent_file "$target_file" "$current_date"; then
log_success "Updated existing $agent_name context file"
else
log_error "Failed to update existing agent file"
return 1
fi
fi
return 0
}
#==============================================================================
# Agent Selection and Processing
#==============================================================================
update_specific_agent() {
local agent_type="$1"
case "$agent_type" in
claude)
update_agent_file "$CLAUDE_FILE" "Claude Code"
;;
gemini)
update_agent_file "$GEMINI_FILE" "Gemini CLI"
;;
copilot)
update_agent_file "$COPILOT_FILE" "GitHub Copilot"
;;
cursor-agent)
update_agent_file "$CURSOR_FILE" "Cursor IDE"
;;
qwen)
update_agent_file "$QWEN_FILE" "Qwen Code"
;;
opencode)
update_agent_file "$AGENTS_FILE" "opencode"
;;
codex)
update_agent_file "$AGENTS_FILE" "Codex CLI"
;;
windsurf)
update_agent_file "$WINDSURF_FILE" "Windsurf"
;;
kilocode)
update_agent_file "$KILOCODE_FILE" "Kilo Code"
;;
auggie)
update_agent_file "$AUGGIE_FILE" "Auggie CLI"
;;
roo)
update_agent_file "$ROO_FILE" "Roo Code"
;;
codebuddy)
update_agent_file "$CODEBUDDY_FILE" "CodeBuddy CLI"
;;
qoder)
update_agent_file "$QODER_FILE" "Qoder CLI"
;;
amp)
update_agent_file "$AMP_FILE" "Amp"
;;
shai)
update_agent_file "$SHAI_FILE" "SHAI"
;;
q)
update_agent_file "$Q_FILE" "Amazon Q Developer CLI"
;;
agy)
update_agent_file "$AGY_FILE" "Antigravity"
;;
bob)
update_agent_file "$BOB_FILE" "IBM Bob"
;;
*)
log_error "Unknown agent type '$agent_type'"
log_error "Expected: claude|gemini|copilot|cursor-agent|qwen|opencode|codex|windsurf|kilocode|auggie|roo|amp|shai|q|agy|bob|qoder"
exit 1
;;
esac
}
update_all_existing_agents() {
local found_agent=false
# Check each possible agent file and update if it exists
if [[ -f "$CLAUDE_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$CLAUDE_FILE" "Claude Code"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$GEMINI_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$GEMINI_FILE" "Gemini CLI"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$COPILOT_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$COPILOT_FILE" "GitHub Copilot"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$CURSOR_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$CURSOR_FILE" "Cursor IDE"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$QWEN_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$QWEN_FILE" "Qwen Code"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$AGENTS_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$AGENTS_FILE" "Codex/opencode"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$WINDSURF_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$WINDSURF_FILE" "Windsurf"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$KILOCODE_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$KILOCODE_FILE" "Kilo Code"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$AUGGIE_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$AUGGIE_FILE" "Auggie CLI"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$ROO_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$ROO_FILE" "Roo Code"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$CODEBUDDY_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$CODEBUDDY_FILE" "CodeBuddy CLI"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$SHAI_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$SHAI_FILE" "SHAI"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$QODER_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$QODER_FILE" "Qoder CLI"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$Q_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$Q_FILE" "Amazon Q Developer CLI"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$AGY_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$AGY_FILE" "Antigravity"
found_agent=true
fi
if [[ -f "$BOB_FILE" ]]; then
update_agent_file "$BOB_FILE" "IBM Bob"
found_agent=true
fi
# If no agent files exist, create a default Claude file
if [[ "$found_agent" == false ]]; then
log_info "No existing agent files found, creating default Claude file..."
update_agent_file "$CLAUDE_FILE" "Claude Code"
fi
}
print_summary() {
echo
log_info "Summary of changes:"
if [[ -n "$NEW_LANG" ]]; then
echo " - Added language: $NEW_LANG"
fi
if [[ -n "$NEW_FRAMEWORK" ]]; then
echo " - Added framework: $NEW_FRAMEWORK"
fi
if [[ -n "$NEW_DB" ]] && [[ "$NEW_DB" != "N/A" ]]; then
echo " - Added database: $NEW_DB"
fi
echo
log_info "Usage: $0 [claude|gemini|copilot|cursor-agent|qwen|opencode|codex|windsurf|kilocode|auggie|codebuddy|shai|q|agy|bob|qoder]"
}
#==============================================================================
# Main Execution
#==============================================================================
main() {
# Validate environment before proceeding
validate_environment
log_info "=== Updating agent context files for feature $CURRENT_BRANCH ==="
# Parse the plan file to extract project information
if ! parse_plan_data "$NEW_PLAN"; then
log_error "Failed to parse plan data"
exit 1
fi
# Process based on agent type argument
local success=true
if [[ -z "$AGENT_TYPE" ]]; then
# No specific agent provided - update all existing agent files
log_info "No agent specified, updating all existing agent files..."
if ! update_all_existing_agents; then
success=false
fi
else
# Specific agent provided - update only that agent
log_info "Updating specific agent: $AGENT_TYPE"
if ! update_specific_agent "$AGENT_TYPE"; then
success=false
fi
fi
# Print summary
print_summary
if [[ "$success" == true ]]; then
log_success "Agent context update completed successfully"
exit 0
else
log_error "Agent context update completed with errors"
exit 1
fi
}
# Execute main function if script is run directly
if [[ "${BASH_SOURCE[0]}" == "${0}" ]]; then
main "$@"
fi
+28
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
# [PROJECT NAME] Development Guidelines
Auto-generated from all feature plans. Last updated: [DATE]
## Active Technologies
[EXTRACTED FROM ALL PLAN.MD FILES]
## Project Structure
```text
[ACTUAL STRUCTURE FROM PLANS]
```
## Commands
[ONLY COMMANDS FOR ACTIVE TECHNOLOGIES]
## Code Style
[LANGUAGE-SPECIFIC, ONLY FOR LANGUAGES IN USE]
## Recent Changes
[LAST 3 FEATURES AND WHAT THEY ADDED]
<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS START -->
<!-- MANUAL ADDITIONS END -->
+40
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
# [CHECKLIST TYPE] Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
**Purpose**: [Brief description of what this checklist covers]
**Created**: [DATE]
**Feature**: [Link to spec.md or relevant documentation]
**Note**: This checklist is generated by the `/speckit.checklist` command based on feature context and requirements.
<!--
============================================================================
IMPORTANT: The checklist items below are SAMPLE ITEMS for illustration only.
The /speckit.checklist command MUST replace these with actual items based on:
- User's specific checklist request
- Feature requirements from spec.md
- Technical context from plan.md
- Implementation details from tasks.md
DO NOT keep these sample items in the generated checklist file.
============================================================================
-->
## [Category 1]
- [ ] CHK001 First checklist item with clear action
- [ ] CHK002 Second checklist item
- [ ] CHK003 Third checklist item
## [Category 2]
- [ ] CHK004 Another category item
- [ ] CHK005 Item with specific criteria
- [ ] CHK006 Final item in this category
## Notes
- Check items off as completed: `[x]`
- Add comments or findings inline
- Link to relevant resources or documentation
- Items are numbered sequentially for easy reference
@@ -0,0 +1,50 @@
# [PROJECT_NAME] Constitution
<!-- Example: Spec Constitution, TaskFlow Constitution, etc. -->
## Core Principles
### [PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]
<!-- Example: I. Library-First -->
[PRINCIPLE_1_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Every feature starts as a standalone library; Libraries must be self-contained, independently testable, documented; Clear purpose required - no organizational-only libraries -->
### [PRINCIPLE_2_NAME]
<!-- Example: II. CLI Interface -->
[PRINCIPLE_2_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Every library exposes functionality via CLI; Text in/out protocol: stdin/args → stdout, errors → stderr; Support JSON + human-readable formats -->
### [PRINCIPLE_3_NAME]
<!-- Example: III. Test-First (NON-NEGOTIABLE) -->
[PRINCIPLE_3_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: TDD mandatory: Tests written → User approved → Tests fail → Then implement; Red-Green-Refactor cycle strictly enforced -->
### [PRINCIPLE_4_NAME]
<!-- Example: IV. Integration Testing -->
[PRINCIPLE_4_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Focus areas requiring integration tests: New library contract tests, Contract changes, Inter-service communication, Shared schemas -->
### [PRINCIPLE_5_NAME]
<!-- Example: V. Observability, VI. Versioning & Breaking Changes, VII. Simplicity -->
[PRINCIPLE_5_DESCRIPTION]
<!-- Example: Text I/O ensures debuggability; Structured logging required; Or: MAJOR.MINOR.BUILD format; Or: Start simple, YAGNI principles -->
## [SECTION_2_NAME]
<!-- Example: Additional Constraints, Security Requirements, Performance Standards, etc. -->
[SECTION_2_CONTENT]
<!-- Example: Technology stack requirements, compliance standards, deployment policies, etc. -->
## [SECTION_3_NAME]
<!-- Example: Development Workflow, Review Process, Quality Gates, etc. -->
[SECTION_3_CONTENT]
<!-- Example: Code review requirements, testing gates, deployment approval process, etc. -->
## Governance
<!-- Example: Constitution supersedes all other practices; Amendments require documentation, approval, migration plan -->
[GOVERNANCE_RULES]
<!-- Example: All PRs/reviews must verify compliance; Complexity must be justified; Use [GUIDANCE_FILE] for runtime development guidance -->
**Version**: [CONSTITUTION_VERSION] | **Ratified**: [RATIFICATION_DATE] | **Last Amended**: [LAST_AMENDED_DATE]
<!-- Example: Version: 2.1.1 | Ratified: 2025-06-13 | Last Amended: 2025-07-16 -->
+104
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
# Implementation Plan: [FEATURE]
**Branch**: `[###-feature-name]` | **Date**: [DATE] | **Spec**: [link]
**Input**: Feature specification from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/spec.md`
**Note**: This template is filled in by the `/speckit.plan` command. See `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` for the execution workflow.
## Summary
[Extract from feature spec: primary requirement + technical approach from research]
## Technical Context
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the content in this section with the technical details
for the project. The structure here is presented in advisory capacity to guide
the iteration process.
-->
**Language/Version**: [e.g., Python 3.11, Swift 5.9, Rust 1.75 or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Primary Dependencies**: [e.g., FastAPI, UIKit, LLVM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Storage**: [if applicable, e.g., PostgreSQL, CoreData, files or N/A]
**Testing**: [e.g., pytest, XCTest, cargo test or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Target Platform**: [e.g., Linux server, iOS 15+, WASM or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Project Type**: [single/web/mobile - determines source structure]
**Performance Goals**: [domain-specific, e.g., 1000 req/s, 10k lines/sec, 60 fps or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Constraints**: [domain-specific, e.g., <200ms p95, <100MB memory, offline-capable or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
**Scale/Scope**: [domain-specific, e.g., 10k users, 1M LOC, 50 screens or NEEDS CLARIFICATION]
## Constitution Check
*GATE: Must pass before Phase 0 research. Re-check after Phase 1 design.*
[Gates determined based on constitution file]
## Project Structure
### Documentation (this feature)
```text
specs/[###-feature]/
├── plan.md # This file (/speckit.plan command output)
├── research.md # Phase 0 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── data-model.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── quickstart.md # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
├── contracts/ # Phase 1 output (/speckit.plan command)
└── tasks.md # Phase 2 output (/speckit.tasks command - NOT created by /speckit.plan)
```
### Source Code (repository root)
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: Replace the placeholder tree below with the concrete layout
for this feature. Delete unused options and expand the chosen structure with
real paths (e.g., apps/admin, packages/something). The delivered plan must
not include Option labels.
-->
```text
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 1: Single project (DEFAULT)
src/
├── models/
├── services/
├── cli/
└── lib/
tests/
├── contract/
├── integration/
└── unit/
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 2: Web application (when "frontend" + "backend" detected)
backend/
├── src/
│ ├── models/
│ ├── services/
│ └── api/
└── tests/
frontend/
├── src/
│ ├── components/
│ ├── pages/
│ └── services/
└── tests/
# [REMOVE IF UNUSED] Option 3: Mobile + API (when "iOS/Android" detected)
api/
└── [same as backend above]
ios/ or android/
└── [platform-specific structure: feature modules, UI flows, platform tests]
```
**Structure Decision**: [Document the selected structure and reference the real
directories captured above]
## Complexity Tracking
> **Fill ONLY if Constitution Check has violations that must be justified**
| Violation | Why Needed | Simpler Alternative Rejected Because |
|-----------|------------|-------------------------------------|
| [e.g., 4th project] | [current need] | [why 3 projects insufficient] |
| [e.g., Repository pattern] | [specific problem] | [why direct DB access insufficient] |
+115
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,115 @@
# Feature Specification: [FEATURE NAME]
**Feature Branch**: `[###-feature-name]`
**Created**: [DATE]
**Status**: Draft
**Input**: User description: "$ARGUMENTS"
## User Scenarios & Testing *(mandatory)*
<!--
IMPORTANT: User stories should be PRIORITIZED as user journeys ordered by importance.
Each user story/journey must be INDEPENDENTLY TESTABLE - meaning if you implement just ONE of them,
you should still have a viable MVP (Minimum Viable Product) that delivers value.
Assign priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.) to each story, where P1 is the most critical.
Think of each story as a standalone slice of functionality that can be:
- Developed independently
- Tested independently
- Deployed independently
- Demonstrated to users independently
-->
### User Story 1 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P1)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently - e.g., "Can be fully tested by [specific action] and delivers [specific value]"]
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
2. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
---
### User Story 2 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P2)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
---
### User Story 3 - [Brief Title] (Priority: P3)
[Describe this user journey in plain language]
**Why this priority**: [Explain the value and why it has this priority level]
**Independent Test**: [Describe how this can be tested independently]
**Acceptance Scenarios**:
1. **Given** [initial state], **When** [action], **Then** [expected outcome]
---
[Add more user stories as needed, each with an assigned priority]
### Edge Cases
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
Fill them out with the right edge cases.
-->
- What happens when [boundary condition]?
- How does system handle [error scenario]?
## Requirements *(mandatory)*
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: The content in this section represents placeholders.
Fill them out with the right functional requirements.
-->
### Functional Requirements
- **FR-001**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "allow users to create accounts"]
- **FR-002**: System MUST [specific capability, e.g., "validate email addresses"]
- **FR-003**: Users MUST be able to [key interaction, e.g., "reset their password"]
- **FR-004**: System MUST [data requirement, e.g., "persist user preferences"]
- **FR-005**: System MUST [behavior, e.g., "log all security events"]
*Example of marking unclear requirements:*
- **FR-006**: System MUST authenticate users via [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: auth method not specified - email/password, SSO, OAuth?]
- **FR-007**: System MUST retain user data for [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: retention period not specified]
### Key Entities *(include if feature involves data)*
- **[Entity 1]**: [What it represents, key attributes without implementation]
- **[Entity 2]**: [What it represents, relationships to other entities]
## Success Criteria *(mandatory)*
<!--
ACTION REQUIRED: Define measurable success criteria.
These must be technology-agnostic and measurable.
-->
### Measurable Outcomes
- **SC-001**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "Users can complete account creation in under 2 minutes"]
- **SC-002**: [Measurable metric, e.g., "System handles 1000 concurrent users without degradation"]
- **SC-003**: [User satisfaction metric, e.g., "90% of users successfully complete primary task on first attempt"]
- **SC-004**: [Business metric, e.g., "Reduce support tickets related to [X] by 50%"]
+251
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
---
description: "Task list template for feature implementation"
---
# Tasks: [FEATURE NAME]
**Input**: Design documents from `/specs/[###-feature-name]/`
**Prerequisites**: plan.md (required), spec.md (required for user stories), research.md, data-model.md, contracts/
**Tests**: The examples below include test tasks. Tests are OPTIONAL - only include them if explicitly requested in the feature specification.
**Organization**: Tasks are grouped by user story to enable independent implementation and testing of each story.
## Format: `[ID] [P?] [Story] Description`
- **[P]**: Can run in parallel (different files, no dependencies)
- **[Story]**: Which user story this task belongs to (e.g., US1, US2, US3)
- Include exact file paths in descriptions
## Path Conventions
- **Single project**: `src/`, `tests/` at repository root
- **Web app**: `backend/src/`, `frontend/src/`
- **Mobile**: `api/src/`, `ios/src/` or `android/src/`
- Paths shown below assume single project - adjust based on plan.md structure
<!--
============================================================================
IMPORTANT: The tasks below are SAMPLE TASKS for illustration purposes only.
The /speckit.tasks command MUST replace these with actual tasks based on:
- User stories from spec.md (with their priorities P1, P2, P3...)
- Feature requirements from plan.md
- Entities from data-model.md
- Endpoints from contracts/
Tasks MUST be organized by user story so each story can be:
- Implemented independently
- Tested independently
- Delivered as an MVP increment
DO NOT keep these sample tasks in the generated tasks.md file.
============================================================================
-->
## Phase 1: Setup (Shared Infrastructure)
**Purpose**: Project initialization and basic structure
- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan
- [ ] T002 Initialize [language] project with [framework] dependencies
- [ ] T003 [P] Configure linting and formatting tools
---
## Phase 2: Foundational (Blocking Prerequisites)
**Purpose**: Core infrastructure that MUST be complete before ANY user story can be implemented
**⚠️ CRITICAL**: No user story work can begin until this phase is complete
Examples of foundational tasks (adjust based on your project):
- [ ] T004 Setup database schema and migrations framework
- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication/authorization framework
- [ ] T006 [P] Setup API routing and middleware structure
- [ ] T007 Create base models/entities that all stories depend on
- [ ] T008 Configure error handling and logging infrastructure
- [ ] T009 Setup environment configuration management
**Checkpoint**: Foundation ready - user story implementation can now begin in parallel
---
## Phase 3: User Story 1 - [Title] (Priority: P1) 🎯 MVP
**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
### Tests for User Story 1 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
> **NOTE: Write these tests FIRST, ensure they FAIL before implementation**
- [ ] T010 [P] [US1] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
- [ ] T011 [P] [US1] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
### Implementation for User Story 1
- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py
- [ ] T013 [P] [US1] Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py
- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py (depends on T012, T013)
- [ ] T015 [US1] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
- [ ] T016 [US1] Add validation and error handling
- [ ] T017 [US1] Add logging for user story 1 operations
**Checkpoint**: At this point, User Story 1 should be fully functional and testable independently
---
## Phase 4: User Story 2 - [Title] (Priority: P2)
**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
### Tests for User Story 2 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
- [ ] T018 [P] [US2] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
- [ ] T019 [P] [US2] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
### Implementation for User Story 2
- [ ] T020 [P] [US2] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
- [ ] T021 [US2] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
- [ ] T022 [US2] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
- [ ] T023 [US2] Integrate with User Story 1 components (if needed)
**Checkpoint**: At this point, User Stories 1 AND 2 should both work independently
---
## Phase 5: User Story 3 - [Title] (Priority: P3)
**Goal**: [Brief description of what this story delivers]
**Independent Test**: [How to verify this story works on its own]
### Tests for User Story 3 (OPTIONAL - only if tests requested) ⚠️
- [ ] T024 [P] [US3] Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py
- [ ] T025 [P] [US3] Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py
### Implementation for User Story 3
- [ ] T026 [P] [US3] Create [Entity] model in src/models/[entity].py
- [ ] T027 [US3] Implement [Service] in src/services/[service].py
- [ ] T028 [US3] Implement [endpoint/feature] in src/[location]/[file].py
**Checkpoint**: All user stories should now be independently functional
---
[Add more user story phases as needed, following the same pattern]
---
## Phase N: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
**Purpose**: Improvements that affect multiple user stories
- [ ] TXXX [P] Documentation updates in docs/
- [ ] TXXX Code cleanup and refactoring
- [ ] TXXX Performance optimization across all stories
- [ ] TXXX [P] Additional unit tests (if requested) in tests/unit/
- [ ] TXXX Security hardening
- [ ] TXXX Run quickstart.md validation
---
## Dependencies & Execution Order
### Phase Dependencies
- **Setup (Phase 1)**: No dependencies - can start immediately
- **Foundational (Phase 2)**: Depends on Setup completion - BLOCKS all user stories
- **User Stories (Phase 3+)**: All depend on Foundational phase completion
- User stories can then proceed in parallel (if staffed)
- Or sequentially in priority order (P1 → P2 → P3)
- **Polish (Final Phase)**: Depends on all desired user stories being complete
### User Story Dependencies
- **User Story 1 (P1)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - No dependencies on other stories
- **User Story 2 (P2)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1 but should be independently testable
- **User Story 3 (P3)**: Can start after Foundational (Phase 2) - May integrate with US1/US2 but should be independently testable
### Within Each User Story
- Tests (if included) MUST be written and FAIL before implementation
- Models before services
- Services before endpoints
- Core implementation before integration
- Story complete before moving to next priority
### Parallel Opportunities
- All Setup tasks marked [P] can run in parallel
- All Foundational tasks marked [P] can run in parallel (within Phase 2)
- Once Foundational phase completes, all user stories can start in parallel (if team capacity allows)
- All tests for a user story marked [P] can run in parallel
- Models within a story marked [P] can run in parallel
- Different user stories can be worked on in parallel by different team members
---
## Parallel Example: User Story 1
```bash
# Launch all tests for User Story 1 together (if tests requested):
Task: "Contract test for [endpoint] in tests/contract/test_[name].py"
Task: "Integration test for [user journey] in tests/integration/test_[name].py"
# Launch all models for User Story 1 together:
Task: "Create [Entity1] model in src/models/[entity1].py"
Task: "Create [Entity2] model in src/models/[entity2].py"
```
---
## Implementation Strategy
### MVP First (User Story 1 Only)
1. Complete Phase 1: Setup
2. Complete Phase 2: Foundational (CRITICAL - blocks all stories)
3. Complete Phase 3: User Story 1
4. **STOP and VALIDATE**: Test User Story 1 independently
5. Deploy/demo if ready
### Incremental Delivery
1. Complete Setup + Foundational → Foundation ready
2. Add User Story 1 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo (MVP!)
3. Add User Story 2 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
4. Add User Story 3 → Test independently → Deploy/Demo
5. Each story adds value without breaking previous stories
### Parallel Team Strategy
With multiple developers:
1. Team completes Setup + Foundational together
2. Once Foundational is done:
- Developer A: User Story 1
- Developer B: User Story 2
- Developer C: User Story 3
3. Stories complete and integrate independently
---
## Notes
- [P] tasks = different files, no dependencies
- [Story] label maps task to specific user story for traceability
- Each user story should be independently completable and testable
- Verify tests fail before implementing
- Commit after each task or logical group
- Stop at any checkpoint to validate story independently
- Avoid: vague tasks, same file conflicts, cross-story dependencies that break independence
+184
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,184 @@
---
description: Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Goal
Identify inconsistencies, duplications, ambiguities, and underspecified items across the three core artifacts (`spec.md`, `plan.md`, `tasks.md`) before implementation. This command MUST run only after `/speckit.tasks` has successfully produced a complete `tasks.md`.
## Operating Constraints
**STRICTLY READ-ONLY**: Do **not** modify any files. Output a structured analysis report. Offer an optional remediation plan (user must explicitly approve before any follow-up editing commands would be invoked manually).
**Constitution Authority**: The project constitution (`.specify/memory/constitution.md`) is **non-negotiable** within this analysis scope. Constitution conflicts are automatically CRITICAL and require adjustment of the spec, plan, or tasks—not dilution, reinterpretation, or silent ignoring of the principle. If a principle itself needs to change, that must occur in a separate, explicit constitution update outside `/speckit.analyze`.
## Execution Steps
### 1. Initialize Analysis Context
Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` once from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS. Derive absolute paths:
- SPEC = FEATURE_DIR/spec.md
- PLAN = FEATURE_DIR/plan.md
- TASKS = FEATURE_DIR/tasks.md
Abort with an error message if any required file is missing (instruct the user to run missing prerequisite command).
For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
### 2. Load Artifacts (Progressive Disclosure)
Load only the minimal necessary context from each artifact:
**From spec.md:**
- Overview/Context
- Functional Requirements
- Non-Functional Requirements
- User Stories
- Edge Cases (if present)
**From plan.md:**
- Architecture/stack choices
- Data Model references
- Phases
- Technical constraints
**From tasks.md:**
- Task IDs
- Descriptions
- Phase grouping
- Parallel markers [P]
- Referenced file paths
**From constitution:**
- Load `.specify/memory/constitution.md` for principle validation
### 3. Build Semantic Models
Create internal representations (do not include raw artifacts in output):
- **Requirements inventory**: Each functional + non-functional requirement with a stable key (derive slug based on imperative phrase; e.g., "User can upload file" → `user-can-upload-file`)
- **User story/action inventory**: Discrete user actions with acceptance criteria
- **Task coverage mapping**: Map each task to one or more requirements or stories (inference by keyword / explicit reference patterns like IDs or key phrases)
- **Constitution rule set**: Extract principle names and MUST/SHOULD normative statements
### 4. Detection Passes (Token-Efficient Analysis)
Focus on high-signal findings. Limit to 50 findings total; aggregate remainder in overflow summary.
#### A. Duplication Detection
- Identify near-duplicate requirements
- Mark lower-quality phrasing for consolidation
#### B. Ambiguity Detection
- Flag vague adjectives (fast, scalable, secure, intuitive, robust) lacking measurable criteria
- Flag unresolved placeholders (TODO, TKTK, ???, `<placeholder>`, etc.)
#### C. Underspecification
- Requirements with verbs but missing object or measurable outcome
- User stories missing acceptance criteria alignment
- Tasks referencing files or components not defined in spec/plan
#### D. Constitution Alignment
- Any requirement or plan element conflicting with a MUST principle
- Missing mandated sections or quality gates from constitution
#### E. Coverage Gaps
- Requirements with zero associated tasks
- Tasks with no mapped requirement/story
- Non-functional requirements not reflected in tasks (e.g., performance, security)
#### F. Inconsistency
- Terminology drift (same concept named differently across files)
- Data entities referenced in plan but absent in spec (or vice versa)
- Task ordering contradictions (e.g., integration tasks before foundational setup tasks without dependency note)
- Conflicting requirements (e.g., one requires Next.js while other specifies Vue)
### 5. Severity Assignment
Use this heuristic to prioritize findings:
- **CRITICAL**: Violates constitution MUST, missing core spec artifact, or requirement with zero coverage that blocks baseline functionality
- **HIGH**: Duplicate or conflicting requirement, ambiguous security/performance attribute, untestable acceptance criterion
- **MEDIUM**: Terminology drift, missing non-functional task coverage, underspecified edge case
- **LOW**: Style/wording improvements, minor redundancy not affecting execution order
### 6. Produce Compact Analysis Report
Output a Markdown report (no file writes) with the following structure:
## Specification Analysis Report
| ID | Category | Severity | Location(s) | Summary | Recommendation |
|----|----------|----------|-------------|---------|----------------|
| A1 | Duplication | HIGH | spec.md:L120-134 | Two similar requirements ... | Merge phrasing; keep clearer version |
(Add one row per finding; generate stable IDs prefixed by category initial.)
**Coverage Summary Table:**
| Requirement Key | Has Task? | Task IDs | Notes |
|-----------------|-----------|----------|-------|
**Constitution Alignment Issues:** (if any)
**Unmapped Tasks:** (if any)
**Metrics:**
- Total Requirements
- Total Tasks
- Coverage % (requirements with >=1 task)
- Ambiguity Count
- Duplication Count
- Critical Issues Count
### 7. Provide Next Actions
At end of report, output a concise Next Actions block:
- If CRITICAL issues exist: Recommend resolving before `/speckit.implement`
- If only LOW/MEDIUM: User may proceed, but provide improvement suggestions
- Provide explicit command suggestions: e.g., "Run /speckit.specify with refinement", "Run /speckit.plan to adjust architecture", "Manually edit tasks.md to add coverage for 'performance-metrics'"
### 8. Offer Remediation
Ask the user: "Would you like me to suggest concrete remediation edits for the top N issues?" (Do NOT apply them automatically.)
## Operating Principles
### Context Efficiency
- **Minimal high-signal tokens**: Focus on actionable findings, not exhaustive documentation
- **Progressive disclosure**: Load artifacts incrementally; don't dump all content into analysis
- **Token-efficient output**: Limit findings table to 50 rows; summarize overflow
- **Deterministic results**: Rerunning without changes should produce consistent IDs and counts
### Analysis Guidelines
- **NEVER modify files** (this is read-only analysis)
- **NEVER hallucinate missing sections** (if absent, report them accurately)
- **Prioritize constitution violations** (these are always CRITICAL)
- **Use examples over exhaustive rules** (cite specific instances, not generic patterns)
- **Report zero issues gracefully** (emit success report with coverage statistics)
## Context
$ARGUMENTS
+294
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,294 @@
---
description: Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
---
## Checklist Purpose: "Unit Tests for English"
**CRITICAL CONCEPT**: Checklists are **UNIT TESTS FOR REQUIREMENTS WRITING** - they validate the quality, clarity, and completeness of requirements in a given domain.
**NOT for verification/testing**:
- ❌ NOT "Verify the button clicks correctly"
- ❌ NOT "Test error handling works"
- ❌ NOT "Confirm the API returns 200"
- ❌ NOT checking if code/implementation matches the spec
**FOR requirements quality validation**:
- ✅ "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined for all card types?" (completeness)
- ✅ "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" (clarity)
- ✅ "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" (consistency)
- ✅ "Are accessibility requirements defined for keyboard navigation?" (coverage)
- ✅ "Does the spec define what happens when logo image fails to load?" (edge cases)
**Metaphor**: If your spec is code written in English, the checklist is its unit test suite. You're testing whether the requirements are well-written, complete, unambiguous, and ready for implementation - NOT whether the implementation works.
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Execution Steps
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list.
- All file paths must be absolute.
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Clarify intent (dynamic)**: Derive up to THREE initial contextual clarifying questions (no pre-baked catalog). They MUST:
- Be generated from the user's phrasing + extracted signals from spec/plan/tasks
- Only ask about information that materially changes checklist content
- Be skipped individually if already unambiguous in `$ARGUMENTS`
- Prefer precision over breadth
Generation algorithm:
1. Extract signals: feature domain keywords (e.g., auth, latency, UX, API), risk indicators ("critical", "must", "compliance"), stakeholder hints ("QA", "review", "security team"), and explicit deliverables ("a11y", "rollback", "contracts").
2. Cluster signals into candidate focus areas (max 4) ranked by relevance.
3. Identify probable audience & timing (author, reviewer, QA, release) if not explicit.
4. Detect missing dimensions: scope breadth, depth/rigor, risk emphasis, exclusion boundaries, measurable acceptance criteria.
5. Formulate questions chosen from these archetypes:
- Scope refinement (e.g., "Should this include integration touchpoints with X and Y or stay limited to local module correctness?")
- Risk prioritization (e.g., "Which of these potential risk areas should receive mandatory gating checks?")
- Depth calibration (e.g., "Is this a lightweight pre-commit sanity list or a formal release gate?")
- Audience framing (e.g., "Will this be used by the author only or peers during PR review?")
- Boundary exclusion (e.g., "Should we explicitly exclude performance tuning items this round?")
- Scenario class gap (e.g., "No recovery flows detected—are rollback / partial failure paths in scope?")
Question formatting rules:
- If presenting options, generate a compact table with columns: Option | Candidate | Why It Matters
- Limit to AE options maximum; omit table if a free-form answer is clearer
- Never ask the user to restate what they already said
- Avoid speculative categories (no hallucination). If uncertain, ask explicitly: "Confirm whether X belongs in scope."
Defaults when interaction impossible:
- Depth: Standard
- Audience: Reviewer (PR) if code-related; Author otherwise
- Focus: Top 2 relevance clusters
Output the questions (label Q1/Q2/Q3). After answers: if ≥2 scenario classes (Alternate / Exception / Recovery / Non-Functional domain) remain unclear, you MAY ask up to TWO more targeted followups (Q4/Q5) with a one-line justification each (e.g., "Unresolved recovery path risk"). Do not exceed five total questions. Skip escalation if user explicitly declines more.
3. **Understand user request**: Combine `$ARGUMENTS` + clarifying answers:
- Derive checklist theme (e.g., security, review, deploy, ux)
- Consolidate explicit must-have items mentioned by user
- Map focus selections to category scaffolding
- Infer any missing context from spec/plan/tasks (do NOT hallucinate)
4. **Load feature context**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- spec.md: Feature requirements and scope
- plan.md (if exists): Technical details, dependencies
- tasks.md (if exists): Implementation tasks
**Context Loading Strategy**:
- Load only necessary portions relevant to active focus areas (avoid full-file dumping)
- Prefer summarizing long sections into concise scenario/requirement bullets
- Use progressive disclosure: add follow-on retrieval only if gaps detected
- If source docs are large, generate interim summary items instead of embedding raw text
5. **Generate checklist** - Create "Unit Tests for Requirements":
- Create `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/` directory if it doesn't exist
- Generate unique checklist filename:
- Use short, descriptive name based on domain (e.g., `ux.md`, `api.md`, `security.md`)
- Format: `[domain].md`
- If file exists, append to existing file
- Number items sequentially starting from CHK001
- Each `/speckit.checklist` run creates a NEW file (never overwrites existing checklists)
**CORE PRINCIPLE - Test the Requirements, Not the Implementation**:
Every checklist item MUST evaluate the REQUIREMENTS THEMSELVES for:
- **Completeness**: Are all necessary requirements present?
- **Clarity**: Are requirements unambiguous and specific?
- **Consistency**: Do requirements align with each other?
- **Measurability**: Can requirements be objectively verified?
- **Coverage**: Are all scenarios/edge cases addressed?
**Category Structure** - Group items by requirement quality dimensions:
- **Requirement Completeness** (Are all necessary requirements documented?)
- **Requirement Clarity** (Are requirements specific and unambiguous?)
- **Requirement Consistency** (Do requirements align without conflicts?)
- **Acceptance Criteria Quality** (Are success criteria measurable?)
- **Scenario Coverage** (Are all flows/cases addressed?)
- **Edge Case Coverage** (Are boundary conditions defined?)
- **Non-Functional Requirements** (Performance, Security, Accessibility, etc. - are they specified?)
- **Dependencies & Assumptions** (Are they documented and validated?)
- **Ambiguities & Conflicts** (What needs clarification?)
**HOW TO WRITE CHECKLIST ITEMS - "Unit Tests for English"**:
**WRONG** (Testing implementation):
- "Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards"
- "Test hover states work on desktop"
- "Confirm logo click navigates home"
**CORRECT** (Testing requirements quality):
- "Are the exact number and layout of featured episodes specified?" [Completeness]
- "Is 'prominent display' quantified with specific sizing/positioning?" [Clarity]
- "Are hover state requirements consistent across all interactive elements?" [Consistency]
- "Are keyboard navigation requirements defined for all interactive UI?" [Coverage]
- "Is the fallback behavior specified when logo image fails to load?" [Edge Cases]
- "Are loading states defined for asynchronous episode data?" [Completeness]
- "Does the spec define visual hierarchy for competing UI elements?" [Clarity]
**ITEM STRUCTURE**:
Each item should follow this pattern:
- Question format asking about requirement quality
- Focus on what's WRITTEN (or not written) in the spec/plan
- Include quality dimension in brackets [Completeness/Clarity/Consistency/etc.]
- Reference spec section `[Spec §X.Y]` when checking existing requirements
- Use `[Gap]` marker when checking for missing requirements
**EXAMPLES BY QUALITY DIMENSION**:
Completeness:
- "Are error handling requirements defined for all API failure modes? [Gap]"
- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Completeness]"
- "Are mobile breakpoint requirements defined for responsive layouts? [Gap]"
Clarity:
- "Is 'fast loading' quantified with specific timing thresholds? [Clarity, Spec §NFR-2]"
- "Are 'related episodes' selection criteria explicitly defined? [Clarity, Spec §FR-5]"
- "Is 'prominent' defined with measurable visual properties? [Ambiguity, Spec §FR-4]"
Consistency:
- "Do navigation requirements align across all pages? [Consistency, Spec §FR-10]"
- "Are card component requirements consistent between landing and detail pages? [Consistency]"
Coverage:
- "Are requirements defined for zero-state scenarios (no episodes)? [Coverage, Edge Case]"
- "Are concurrent user interaction scenarios addressed? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Are requirements specified for partial data loading failures? [Coverage, Exception Flow]"
Measurability:
- "Are visual hierarchy requirements measurable/testable? [Acceptance Criteria, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Can 'balanced visual weight' be objectively verified? [Measurability, Spec §FR-2]"
**Scenario Classification & Coverage** (Requirements Quality Focus):
- Check if requirements exist for: Primary, Alternate, Exception/Error, Recovery, Non-Functional scenarios
- For each scenario class, ask: "Are [scenario type] requirements complete, clear, and consistent?"
- If scenario class missing: "Are [scenario type] requirements intentionally excluded or missing? [Gap]"
- Include resilience/rollback when state mutation occurs: "Are rollback requirements defined for migration failures? [Gap]"
**Traceability Requirements**:
- MINIMUM: ≥80% of items MUST include at least one traceability reference
- Each item should reference: spec section `[Spec §X.Y]`, or use markers: `[Gap]`, `[Ambiguity]`, `[Conflict]`, `[Assumption]`
- If no ID system exists: "Is a requirement & acceptance criteria ID scheme established? [Traceability]"
**Surface & Resolve Issues** (Requirements Quality Problems):
Ask questions about the requirements themselves:
- Ambiguities: "Is the term 'fast' quantified with specific metrics? [Ambiguity, Spec §NFR-1]"
- Conflicts: "Do navigation requirements conflict between §FR-10 and §FR-10a? [Conflict]"
- Assumptions: "Is the assumption of 'always available podcast API' validated? [Assumption]"
- Dependencies: "Are external podcast API requirements documented? [Dependency, Gap]"
- Missing definitions: "Is 'visual hierarchy' defined with measurable criteria? [Gap]"
**Content Consolidation**:
- Soft cap: If raw candidate items > 40, prioritize by risk/impact
- Merge near-duplicates checking the same requirement aspect
- If >5 low-impact edge cases, create one item: "Are edge cases X, Y, Z addressed in requirements? [Coverage]"
**🚫 ABSOLUTELY PROHIBITED** - These make it an implementation test, not a requirements test:
- ❌ Any item starting with "Verify", "Test", "Confirm", "Check" + implementation behavior
- ❌ References to code execution, user actions, system behavior
- ❌ "Displays correctly", "works properly", "functions as expected"
- ❌ "Click", "navigate", "render", "load", "execute"
- ❌ Test cases, test plans, QA procedures
- ❌ Implementation details (frameworks, APIs, algorithms)
**✅ REQUIRED PATTERNS** - These test requirements quality:
- ✅ "Are [requirement type] defined/specified/documented for [scenario]?"
- ✅ "Is [vague term] quantified/clarified with specific criteria?"
- ✅ "Are requirements consistent between [section A] and [section B]?"
- ✅ "Can [requirement] be objectively measured/verified?"
- ✅ "Are [edge cases/scenarios] addressed in requirements?"
- ✅ "Does the spec define [missing aspect]?"
6. **Structure Reference**: Generate the checklist following the canonical template in `.specify/templates/checklist-template.md` for title, meta section, category headings, and ID formatting. If template is unavailable, use: H1 title, purpose/created meta lines, `##` category sections containing `- [ ] CHK### <requirement item>` lines with globally incrementing IDs starting at CHK001.
7. **Report**: Output full path to created checklist, item count, and remind user that each run creates a new file. Summarize:
- Focus areas selected
- Depth level
- Actor/timing
- Any explicit user-specified must-have items incorporated
**Important**: Each `/speckit.checklist` command invocation creates a checklist file using short, descriptive names unless file already exists. This allows:
- Multiple checklists of different types (e.g., `ux.md`, `test.md`, `security.md`)
- Simple, memorable filenames that indicate checklist purpose
- Easy identification and navigation in the `checklists/` folder
To avoid clutter, use descriptive types and clean up obsolete checklists when done.
## Example Checklist Types & Sample Items
**UX Requirements Quality:** `ux.md`
Sample items (testing the requirements, NOT the implementation):
- "Are visual hierarchy requirements defined with measurable criteria? [Clarity, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Is the number and positioning of UI elements explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-1]"
- "Are interaction state requirements (hover, focus, active) consistently defined? [Consistency]"
- "Are accessibility requirements specified for all interactive elements? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Is fallback behavior defined when images fail to load? [Edge Case, Gap]"
- "Can 'prominent display' be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-4]"
**API Requirements Quality:** `api.md`
Sample items:
- "Are error response formats specified for all failure scenarios? [Completeness]"
- "Are rate limiting requirements quantified with specific thresholds? [Clarity]"
- "Are authentication requirements consistent across all endpoints? [Consistency]"
- "Are retry/timeout requirements defined for external dependencies? [Coverage, Gap]"
- "Is versioning strategy documented in requirements? [Gap]"
**Performance Requirements Quality:** `performance.md`
Sample items:
- "Are performance requirements quantified with specific metrics? [Clarity]"
- "Are performance targets defined for all critical user journeys? [Coverage]"
- "Are performance requirements under different load conditions specified? [Completeness]"
- "Can performance requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability]"
- "Are degradation requirements defined for high-load scenarios? [Edge Case, Gap]"
**Security Requirements Quality:** `security.md`
Sample items:
- "Are authentication requirements specified for all protected resources? [Coverage]"
- "Are data protection requirements defined for sensitive information? [Completeness]"
- "Is the threat model documented and requirements aligned to it? [Traceability]"
- "Are security requirements consistent with compliance obligations? [Consistency]"
- "Are security failure/breach response requirements defined? [Gap, Exception Flow]"
## Anti-Examples: What NOT To Do
**❌ WRONG - These test implementation, not requirements:**
```markdown
- [ ] CHK001 - Verify landing page displays 3 episode cards [Spec §FR-001]
- [ ] CHK002 - Test hover states work correctly on desktop [Spec §FR-003]
- [ ] CHK003 - Confirm logo click navigates to home page [Spec §FR-010]
- [ ] CHK004 - Check that related episodes section shows 3-5 items [Spec §FR-005]
```
**✅ CORRECT - These test requirements quality:**
```markdown
- [ ] CHK001 - Are the number and layout of featured episodes explicitly specified? [Completeness, Spec §FR-001]
- [ ] CHK002 - Are hover state requirements consistently defined for all interactive elements? [Consistency, Spec §FR-003]
- [ ] CHK003 - Are navigation requirements clear for all clickable brand elements? [Clarity, Spec §FR-010]
- [ ] CHK004 - Is the selection criteria for related episodes documented? [Gap, Spec §FR-005]
- [ ] CHK005 - Are loading state requirements defined for asynchronous episode data? [Gap]
- [ ] CHK006 - Can "visual hierarchy" requirements be objectively measured? [Measurability, Spec §FR-001]
```
**Key Differences:**
- Wrong: Tests if the system works correctly
- Correct: Tests if the requirements are written correctly
- Wrong: Verification of behavior
- Correct: Validation of requirement quality
- Wrong: "Does it do X?"
- Correct: "Is X clearly specified?"
+181
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,181 @@
---
description: Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
handoffs:
- label: Build Technical Plan
agent: speckit.plan
prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
Goal: Detect and reduce ambiguity or missing decision points in the active feature specification and record the clarifications directly in the spec file.
Note: This clarification workflow is expected to run (and be completed) BEFORE invoking `/speckit.plan`. If the user explicitly states they are skipping clarification (e.g., exploratory spike), you may proceed, but must warn that downstream rework risk increases.
Execution steps:
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --paths-only` from repo root **once** (combined `--json --paths-only` mode / `-Json -PathsOnly`). Parse minimal JSON payload fields:
- `FEATURE_DIR`
- `FEATURE_SPEC`
- (Optionally capture `IMPL_PLAN`, `TASKS` for future chained flows.)
- If JSON parsing fails, abort and instruct user to re-run `/speckit.specify` or verify feature branch environment.
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. Load the current spec file. Perform a structured ambiguity & coverage scan using this taxonomy. For each category, mark status: Clear / Partial / Missing. Produce an internal coverage map used for prioritization (do not output raw map unless no questions will be asked).
Functional Scope & Behavior:
- Core user goals & success criteria
- Explicit out-of-scope declarations
- User roles / personas differentiation
Domain & Data Model:
- Entities, attributes, relationships
- Identity & uniqueness rules
- Lifecycle/state transitions
- Data volume / scale assumptions
Interaction & UX Flow:
- Critical user journeys / sequences
- Error/empty/loading states
- Accessibility or localization notes
Non-Functional Quality Attributes:
- Performance (latency, throughput targets)
- Scalability (horizontal/vertical, limits)
- Reliability & availability (uptime, recovery expectations)
- Observability (logging, metrics, tracing signals)
- Security & privacy (authN/Z, data protection, threat assumptions)
- Compliance / regulatory constraints (if any)
Integration & External Dependencies:
- External services/APIs and failure modes
- Data import/export formats
- Protocol/versioning assumptions
Edge Cases & Failure Handling:
- Negative scenarios
- Rate limiting / throttling
- Conflict resolution (e.g., concurrent edits)
Constraints & Tradeoffs:
- Technical constraints (language, storage, hosting)
- Explicit tradeoffs or rejected alternatives
Terminology & Consistency:
- Canonical glossary terms
- Avoided synonyms / deprecated terms
Completion Signals:
- Acceptance criteria testability
- Measurable Definition of Done style indicators
Misc / Placeholders:
- TODO markers / unresolved decisions
- Ambiguous adjectives ("robust", "intuitive") lacking quantification
For each category with Partial or Missing status, add a candidate question opportunity unless:
- Clarification would not materially change implementation or validation strategy
- Information is better deferred to planning phase (note internally)
3. Generate (internally) a prioritized queue of candidate clarification questions (maximum 5). Do NOT output them all at once. Apply these constraints:
- Maximum of 10 total questions across the whole session.
- Each question must be answerable with EITHER:
- A short multiplechoice selection (25 distinct, mutually exclusive options), OR
- A one-word / shortphrase answer (explicitly constrain: "Answer in <=5 words").
- Only include questions whose answers materially impact architecture, data modeling, task decomposition, test design, UX behavior, operational readiness, or compliance validation.
- Ensure category coverage balance: attempt to cover the highest impact unresolved categories first; avoid asking two low-impact questions when a single high-impact area (e.g., security posture) is unresolved.
- Exclude questions already answered, trivial stylistic preferences, or plan-level execution details (unless blocking correctness).
- Favor clarifications that reduce downstream rework risk or prevent misaligned acceptance tests.
- If more than 5 categories remain unresolved, select the top 5 by (Impact * Uncertainty) heuristic.
4. Sequential questioning loop (interactive):
- Present EXACTLY ONE question at a time.
- For multiplechoice questions:
- **Analyze all options** and determine the **most suitable option** based on:
- Best practices for the project type
- Common patterns in similar implementations
- Risk reduction (security, performance, maintainability)
- Alignment with any explicit project goals or constraints visible in the spec
- Present your **recommended option prominently** at the top with clear reasoning (1-2 sentences explaining why this is the best choice).
- Format as: `**Recommended:** Option [X] - <reasoning>`
- Then render all options as a Markdown table:
| Option | Description |
|--------|-------------|
| A | <Option A description> |
| B | <Option B description> |
| C | <Option C description> (add D/E as needed up to 5) |
| Short | Provide a different short answer (<=5 words) (Include only if free-form alternative is appropriate) |
- After the table, add: `You can reply with the option letter (e.g., "A"), accept the recommendation by saying "yes" or "recommended", or provide your own short answer.`
- For shortanswer style (no meaningful discrete options):
- Provide your **suggested answer** based on best practices and context.
- Format as: `**Suggested:** <your proposed answer> - <brief reasoning>`
- Then output: `Format: Short answer (<=5 words). You can accept the suggestion by saying "yes" or "suggested", or provide your own answer.`
- After the user answers:
- If the user replies with "yes", "recommended", or "suggested", use your previously stated recommendation/suggestion as the answer.
- Otherwise, validate the answer maps to one option or fits the <=5 word constraint.
- If ambiguous, ask for a quick disambiguation (count still belongs to same question; do not advance).
- Once satisfactory, record it in working memory (do not yet write to disk) and move to the next queued question.
- Stop asking further questions when:
- All critical ambiguities resolved early (remaining queued items become unnecessary), OR
- User signals completion ("done", "good", "no more"), OR
- You reach 5 asked questions.
- Never reveal future queued questions in advance.
- If no valid questions exist at start, immediately report no critical ambiguities.
5. Integration after EACH accepted answer (incremental update approach):
- Maintain in-memory representation of the spec (loaded once at start) plus the raw file contents.
- For the first integrated answer in this session:
- Ensure a `## Clarifications` section exists (create it just after the highest-level contextual/overview section per the spec template if missing).
- Under it, create (if not present) a `### Session YYYY-MM-DD` subheading for today.
- Append a bullet line immediately after acceptance: `- Q: <question> → A: <final answer>`.
- Then immediately apply the clarification to the most appropriate section(s):
- Functional ambiguity → Update or add a bullet in Functional Requirements.
- User interaction / actor distinction → Update User Stories or Actors subsection (if present) with clarified role, constraint, or scenario.
- Data shape / entities → Update Data Model (add fields, types, relationships) preserving ordering; note added constraints succinctly.
- Non-functional constraint → Add/modify measurable criteria in Non-Functional / Quality Attributes section (convert vague adjective to metric or explicit target).
- Edge case / negative flow → Add a new bullet under Edge Cases / Error Handling (or create such subsection if template provides placeholder for it).
- Terminology conflict → Normalize term across spec; retain original only if necessary by adding `(formerly referred to as "X")` once.
- If the clarification invalidates an earlier ambiguous statement, replace that statement instead of duplicating; leave no obsolete contradictory text.
- Save the spec file AFTER each integration to minimize risk of context loss (atomic overwrite).
- Preserve formatting: do not reorder unrelated sections; keep heading hierarchy intact.
- Keep each inserted clarification minimal and testable (avoid narrative drift).
6. Validation (performed after EACH write plus final pass):
- Clarifications session contains exactly one bullet per accepted answer (no duplicates).
- Total asked (accepted) questions ≤ 5.
- Updated sections contain no lingering vague placeholders the new answer was meant to resolve.
- No contradictory earlier statement remains (scan for now-invalid alternative choices removed).
- Markdown structure valid; only allowed new headings: `## Clarifications`, `### Session YYYY-MM-DD`.
- Terminology consistency: same canonical term used across all updated sections.
7. Write the updated spec back to `FEATURE_SPEC`.
8. Report completion (after questioning loop ends or early termination):
- Number of questions asked & answered.
- Path to updated spec.
- Sections touched (list names).
- Coverage summary table listing each taxonomy category with Status: Resolved (was Partial/Missing and addressed), Deferred (exceeds question quota or better suited for planning), Clear (already sufficient), Outstanding (still Partial/Missing but low impact).
- If any Outstanding or Deferred remain, recommend whether to proceed to `/speckit.plan` or run `/speckit.clarify` again later post-plan.
- Suggested next command.
Behavior rules:
- If no meaningful ambiguities found (or all potential questions would be low-impact), respond: "No critical ambiguities detected worth formal clarification." and suggest proceeding.
- If spec file missing, instruct user to run `/speckit.specify` first (do not create a new spec here).
- Never exceed 5 total asked questions (clarification retries for a single question do not count as new questions).
- Avoid speculative tech stack questions unless the absence blocks functional clarity.
- Respect user early termination signals ("stop", "done", "proceed").
- If no questions asked due to full coverage, output a compact coverage summary (all categories Clear) then suggest advancing.
- If quota reached with unresolved high-impact categories remaining, explicitly flag them under Deferred with rationale.
Context for prioritization: $ARGUMENTS
+84
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
---
description: Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs, ensuring all dependent templates stay in sync.
handoffs:
- label: Build Specification
agent: speckit.specify
prompt: Implement the feature specification based on the updated constitution. I want to build...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
You are updating the project constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. This file is a TEMPLATE containing placeholder tokens in square brackets (e.g. `[PROJECT_NAME]`, `[PRINCIPLE_1_NAME]`). Your job is to (a) collect/derive concrete values, (b) fill the template precisely, and (c) propagate any amendments across dependent artifacts.
**Note**: If `.specify/memory/constitution.md` does not exist yet, it should have been initialized from `.specify/templates/constitution-template.md` during project setup. If it's missing, copy the template first.
Follow this execution flow:
1. Load the existing constitution at `.specify/memory/constitution.md`.
- Identify every placeholder token of the form `[ALL_CAPS_IDENTIFIER]`.
**IMPORTANT**: The user might require less or more principles than the ones used in the template. If a number is specified, respect that - follow the general template. You will update the doc accordingly.
2. Collect/derive values for placeholders:
- If user input (conversation) supplies a value, use it.
- Otherwise infer from existing repo context (README, docs, prior constitution versions if embedded).
- For governance dates: `RATIFICATION_DATE` is the original adoption date (if unknown ask or mark TODO), `LAST_AMENDED_DATE` is today if changes are made, otherwise keep previous.
- `CONSTITUTION_VERSION` must increment according to semantic versioning rules:
- MAJOR: Backward incompatible governance/principle removals or redefinitions.
- MINOR: New principle/section added or materially expanded guidance.
- PATCH: Clarifications, wording, typo fixes, non-semantic refinements.
- If version bump type ambiguous, propose reasoning before finalizing.
3. Draft the updated constitution content:
- Replace every placeholder with concrete text (no bracketed tokens left except intentionally retained template slots that the project has chosen not to define yet—explicitly justify any left).
- Preserve heading hierarchy and comments can be removed once replaced unless they still add clarifying guidance.
- Ensure each Principle section: succinct name line, paragraph (or bullet list) capturing nonnegotiable rules, explicit rationale if not obvious.
- Ensure Governance section lists amendment procedure, versioning policy, and compliance review expectations.
4. Consistency propagation checklist (convert prior checklist into active validations):
- Read `.specify/templates/plan-template.md` and ensure any "Constitution Check" or rules align with updated principles.
- Read `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` for scope/requirements alignment—update if constitution adds/removes mandatory sections or constraints.
- Read `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` and ensure task categorization reflects new or removed principle-driven task types (e.g., observability, versioning, testing discipline).
- Read each command file in `.specify/templates/commands/*.md` (including this one) to verify no outdated references (agent-specific names like CLAUDE only) remain when generic guidance is required.
- Read any runtime guidance docs (e.g., `README.md`, `docs/quickstart.md`, or agent-specific guidance files if present). Update references to principles changed.
5. Produce a Sync Impact Report (prepend as an HTML comment at top of the constitution file after update):
- Version change: old → new
- List of modified principles (old title → new title if renamed)
- Added sections
- Removed sections
- Templates requiring updates (✅ updated / ⚠ pending) with file paths
- Follow-up TODOs if any placeholders intentionally deferred.
6. Validation before final output:
- No remaining unexplained bracket tokens.
- Version line matches report.
- Dates ISO format YYYY-MM-DD.
- Principles are declarative, testable, and free of vague language ("should" → replace with MUST/SHOULD rationale where appropriate).
7. Write the completed constitution back to `.specify/memory/constitution.md` (overwrite).
8. Output a final summary to the user with:
- New version and bump rationale.
- Any files flagged for manual follow-up.
- Suggested commit message (e.g., `docs: amend constitution to vX.Y.Z (principle additions + governance update)`).
Formatting & Style Requirements:
- Use Markdown headings exactly as in the template (do not demote/promote levels).
- Wrap long rationale lines to keep readability (<100 chars ideally) but do not hard enforce with awkward breaks.
- Keep a single blank line between sections.
- Avoid trailing whitespace.
If the user supplies partial updates (e.g., only one principle revision), still perform validation and version decision steps.
If critical info missing (e.g., ratification date truly unknown), insert `TODO(<FIELD_NAME>): explanation` and include in the Sync Impact Report under deferred items.
Do not create a new template; always operate on the existing `.specify/memory/constitution.md` file.
+135
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
---
description: Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Check checklists status** (if FEATURE_DIR/checklists/ exists):
- Scan all checklist files in the checklists/ directory
- For each checklist, count:
- Total items: All lines matching `- [ ]` or `- [X]` or `- [x]`
- Completed items: Lines matching `- [X]` or `- [x]`
- Incomplete items: Lines matching `- [ ]`
- Create a status table:
```text
| Checklist | Total | Completed | Incomplete | Status |
|-----------|-------|-----------|------------|--------|
| ux.md | 12 | 12 | 0 | ✓ PASS |
| test.md | 8 | 5 | 3 | ✗ FAIL |
| security.md | 6 | 6 | 0 | ✓ PASS |
```
- Calculate overall status:
- **PASS**: All checklists have 0 incomplete items
- **FAIL**: One or more checklists have incomplete items
- **If any checklist is incomplete**:
- Display the table with incomplete item counts
- **STOP** and ask: "Some checklists are incomplete. Do you want to proceed with implementation anyway? (yes/no)"
- Wait for user response before continuing
- If user says "no" or "wait" or "stop", halt execution
- If user says "yes" or "proceed" or "continue", proceed to step 3
- **If all checklists are complete**:
- Display the table showing all checklists passed
- Automatically proceed to step 3
3. Load and analyze the implementation context:
- **REQUIRED**: Read tasks.md for the complete task list and execution plan
- **REQUIRED**: Read plan.md for tech stack, architecture, and file structure
- **IF EXISTS**: Read data-model.md for entities and relationships
- **IF EXISTS**: Read contracts/ for API specifications and test requirements
- **IF EXISTS**: Read research.md for technical decisions and constraints
- **IF EXISTS**: Read quickstart.md for integration scenarios
4. **Project Setup Verification**:
- **REQUIRED**: Create/verify ignore files based on actual project setup:
**Detection & Creation Logic**:
- Check if the following command succeeds to determine if the repository is a git repo (create/verify .gitignore if so):
```sh
git rev-parse --git-dir 2>/dev/null
```
- Check if Dockerfile* exists or Docker in plan.md → create/verify .dockerignore
- Check if .eslintrc* exists → create/verify .eslintignore
- Check if eslint.config.* exists → ensure the config's `ignores` entries cover required patterns
- Check if .prettierrc* exists → create/verify .prettierignore
- Check if .npmrc or package.json exists → create/verify .npmignore (if publishing)
- Check if terraform files (*.tf) exist → create/verify .terraformignore
- Check if .helmignore needed (helm charts present) → create/verify .helmignore
**If ignore file already exists**: Verify it contains essential patterns, append missing critical patterns only
**If ignore file missing**: Create with full pattern set for detected technology
**Common Patterns by Technology** (from plan.md tech stack):
- **Node.js/JavaScript/TypeScript**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Python**: `__pycache__/`, `*.pyc`, `.venv/`, `venv/`, `dist/`, `*.egg-info/`
- **Java**: `target/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `.gradle/`, `build/`
- **C#/.NET**: `bin/`, `obj/`, `*.user`, `*.suo`, `packages/`
- **Go**: `*.exe`, `*.test`, `vendor/`, `*.out`
- **Ruby**: `.bundle/`, `log/`, `tmp/`, `*.gem`, `vendor/bundle/`
- **PHP**: `vendor/`, `*.log`, `*.cache`, `*.env`
- **Rust**: `target/`, `debug/`, `release/`, `*.rs.bk`, `*.rlib`, `*.prof*`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Kotlin**: `build/`, `out/`, `.gradle/`, `.idea/`, `*.class`, `*.jar`, `*.iml`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **C++**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.so`, `*.a`, `*.exe`, `*.dll`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **C**: `build/`, `bin/`, `obj/`, `out/`, `*.o`, `*.a`, `*.so`, `*.exe`, `Makefile`, `config.log`, `.idea/`, `*.log`, `.env*`
- **Swift**: `.build/`, `DerivedData/`, `*.swiftpm/`, `Packages/`
- **R**: `.Rproj.user/`, `.Rhistory`, `.RData`, `.Ruserdata`, `*.Rproj`, `packrat/`, `renv/`
- **Universal**: `.DS_Store`, `Thumbs.db`, `*.tmp`, `*.swp`, `.vscode/`, `.idea/`
**Tool-Specific Patterns**:
- **Docker**: `node_modules/`, `.git/`, `Dockerfile*`, `.dockerignore`, `*.log*`, `.env*`, `coverage/`
- **ESLint**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `*.min.js`
- **Prettier**: `node_modules/`, `dist/`, `build/`, `coverage/`, `package-lock.json`, `yarn.lock`, `pnpm-lock.yaml`
- **Terraform**: `.terraform/`, `*.tfstate*`, `*.tfvars`, `.terraform.lock.hcl`
- **Kubernetes/k8s**: `*.secret.yaml`, `secrets/`, `.kube/`, `kubeconfig*`, `*.key`, `*.crt`
5. Parse tasks.md structure and extract:
- **Task phases**: Setup, Tests, Core, Integration, Polish
- **Task dependencies**: Sequential vs parallel execution rules
- **Task details**: ID, description, file paths, parallel markers [P]
- **Execution flow**: Order and dependency requirements
6. Execute implementation following the task plan:
- **Phase-by-phase execution**: Complete each phase before moving to the next
- **Respect dependencies**: Run sequential tasks in order, parallel tasks [P] can run together
- **Follow TDD approach**: Execute test tasks before their corresponding implementation tasks
- **File-based coordination**: Tasks affecting the same files must run sequentially
- **Validation checkpoints**: Verify each phase completion before proceeding
7. Implementation execution rules:
- **Setup first**: Initialize project structure, dependencies, configuration
- **Tests before code**: If you need to write tests for contracts, entities, and integration scenarios
- **Core development**: Implement models, services, CLI commands, endpoints
- **Integration work**: Database connections, middleware, logging, external services
- **Polish and validation**: Unit tests, performance optimization, documentation
8. Progress tracking and error handling:
- Report progress after each completed task
- Halt execution if any non-parallel task fails
- For parallel tasks [P], continue with successful tasks, report failed ones
- Provide clear error messages with context for debugging
- Suggest next steps if implementation cannot proceed
- **IMPORTANT** For completed tasks, make sure to mark the task off as [X] in the tasks file.
9. Completion validation:
- Verify all required tasks are completed
- Check that implemented features match the original specification
- Validate that tests pass and coverage meets requirements
- Confirm the implementation follows the technical plan
- Report final status with summary of completed work
Note: This command assumes a complete task breakdown exists in tasks.md. If tasks are incomplete or missing, suggest running `/speckit.tasks` first to regenerate the task list.
+89
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,89 @@
---
description: Execute the implementation planning workflow using the plan template to generate design artifacts.
handoffs:
- label: Create Tasks
agent: speckit.tasks
prompt: Break the plan into tasks
send: true
- label: Create Checklist
agent: speckit.checklist
prompt: Create a checklist for the following domain...
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/setup-plan.sh --json` from repo root and parse JSON for FEATURE_SPEC, IMPL_PLAN, SPECS_DIR, BRANCH. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Load context**: Read FEATURE_SPEC and `.specify/memory/constitution.md`. Load IMPL_PLAN template (already copied).
3. **Execute plan workflow**: Follow the structure in IMPL_PLAN template to:
- Fill Technical Context (mark unknowns as "NEEDS CLARIFICATION")
- Fill Constitution Check section from constitution
- Evaluate gates (ERROR if violations unjustified)
- Phase 0: Generate research.md (resolve all NEEDS CLARIFICATION)
- Phase 1: Generate data-model.md, contracts/, quickstart.md
- Phase 1: Update agent context by running the agent script
- Re-evaluate Constitution Check post-design
4. **Stop and report**: Command ends after Phase 2 planning. Report branch, IMPL_PLAN path, and generated artifacts.
## Phases
### Phase 0: Outline & Research
1. **Extract unknowns from Technical Context** above:
- For each NEEDS CLARIFICATION → research task
- For each dependency → best practices task
- For each integration → patterns task
2. **Generate and dispatch research agents**:
```text
For each unknown in Technical Context:
Task: "Research {unknown} for {feature context}"
For each technology choice:
Task: "Find best practices for {tech} in {domain}"
```
3. **Consolidate findings** in `research.md` using format:
- Decision: [what was chosen]
- Rationale: [why chosen]
- Alternatives considered: [what else evaluated]
**Output**: research.md with all NEEDS CLARIFICATION resolved
### Phase 1: Design & Contracts
**Prerequisites:** `research.md` complete
1. **Extract entities from feature spec** → `data-model.md`:
- Entity name, fields, relationships
- Validation rules from requirements
- State transitions if applicable
2. **Generate API contracts** from functional requirements:
- For each user action → endpoint
- Use standard REST/GraphQL patterns
- Output OpenAPI/GraphQL schema to `/contracts/`
3. **Agent context update**:
- Run `.specify/scripts/bash/update-agent-context.sh claude`
- These scripts detect which AI agent is in use
- Update the appropriate agent-specific context file
- Add only new technology from current plan
- Preserve manual additions between markers
**Output**: data-model.md, /contracts/*, quickstart.md, agent-specific file
## Key rules
- Use absolute paths
- ERROR on gate failures or unresolved clarifications
+258
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
---
description: Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
handoffs:
- label: Build Technical Plan
agent: speckit.plan
prompt: Create a plan for the spec. I am building with...
- label: Clarify Spec Requirements
agent: speckit.clarify
prompt: Clarify specification requirements
send: true
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
The text the user typed after `/speckit.specify` in the triggering message **is** the feature description. Assume you always have it available in this conversation even if `$ARGUMENTS` appears literally below. Do not ask the user to repeat it unless they provided an empty command.
Given that feature description, do this:
1. **Generate a concise short name** (2-4 words) for the branch:
- Analyze the feature description and extract the most meaningful keywords
- Create a 2-4 word short name that captures the essence of the feature
- Use action-noun format when possible (e.g., "add-user-auth", "fix-payment-bug")
- Preserve technical terms and acronyms (OAuth2, API, JWT, etc.)
- Keep it concise but descriptive enough to understand the feature at a glance
- Examples:
- "I want to add user authentication" → "user-auth"
- "Implement OAuth2 integration for the API" → "oauth2-api-integration"
- "Create a dashboard for analytics" → "analytics-dashboard"
- "Fix payment processing timeout bug" → "fix-payment-timeout"
2. **Check for existing branches before creating new one**:
a. First, fetch all remote branches to ensure we have the latest information:
```bash
git fetch --all --prune
```
b. Find the highest feature number across all sources for the short-name:
- Remote branches: `git ls-remote --heads origin | grep -E 'refs/heads/[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
- Local branches: `git branch | grep -E '^[* ]*[0-9]+-<short-name>$'`
- Specs directories: Check for directories matching `specs/[0-9]+-<short-name>`
c. Determine the next available number:
- Extract all numbers from all three sources
- Find the highest number N
- Use N+1 for the new branch number
d. Run the script `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS"` with the calculated number and short-name:
- Pass `--number N+1` and `--short-name "your-short-name"` along with the feature description
- Bash example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" --json --number 5 --short-name "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
- PowerShell example: `.specify/scripts/bash/create-new-feature.sh --json "$ARGUMENTS" -Json -Number 5 -ShortName "user-auth" "Add user authentication"`
**IMPORTANT**:
- Check all three sources (remote branches, local branches, specs directories) to find the highest number
- Only match branches/directories with the exact short-name pattern
- If no existing branches/directories found with this short-name, start with number 1
- You must only ever run this script once per feature
- The JSON is provided in the terminal as output - always refer to it to get the actual content you're looking for
- The JSON output will contain BRANCH_NAME and SPEC_FILE paths
- For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot")
3. Load `.specify/templates/spec-template.md` to understand required sections.
4. Follow this execution flow:
1. Parse user description from Input
If empty: ERROR "No feature description provided"
2. Extract key concepts from description
Identify: actors, actions, data, constraints
3. For unclear aspects:
- Make informed guesses based on context and industry standards
- Only mark with [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: specific question] if:
- The choice significantly impacts feature scope or user experience
- Multiple reasonable interpretations exist with different implications
- No reasonable default exists
- **LIMIT: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers total**
- Prioritize clarifications by impact: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
4. Fill User Scenarios & Testing section
If no clear user flow: ERROR "Cannot determine user scenarios"
5. Generate Functional Requirements
Each requirement must be testable
Use reasonable defaults for unspecified details (document assumptions in Assumptions section)
6. Define Success Criteria
Create measurable, technology-agnostic outcomes
Include both quantitative metrics (time, performance, volume) and qualitative measures (user satisfaction, task completion)
Each criterion must be verifiable without implementation details
7. Identify Key Entities (if data involved)
8. Return: SUCCESS (spec ready for planning)
5. Write the specification to SPEC_FILE using the template structure, replacing placeholders with concrete details derived from the feature description (arguments) while preserving section order and headings.
6. **Specification Quality Validation**: After writing the initial spec, validate it against quality criteria:
a. **Create Spec Quality Checklist**: Generate a checklist file at `FEATURE_DIR/checklists/requirements.md` using the checklist template structure with these validation items:
```markdown
# Specification Quality Checklist: [FEATURE NAME]
**Purpose**: Validate specification completeness and quality before proceeding to planning
**Created**: [DATE]
**Feature**: [Link to spec.md]
## Content Quality
- [ ] No implementation details (languages, frameworks, APIs)
- [ ] Focused on user value and business needs
- [ ] Written for non-technical stakeholders
- [ ] All mandatory sections completed
## Requirement Completeness
- [ ] No [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain
- [ ] Requirements are testable and unambiguous
- [ ] Success criteria are measurable
- [ ] Success criteria are technology-agnostic (no implementation details)
- [ ] All acceptance scenarios are defined
- [ ] Edge cases are identified
- [ ] Scope is clearly bounded
- [ ] Dependencies and assumptions identified
## Feature Readiness
- [ ] All functional requirements have clear acceptance criteria
- [ ] User scenarios cover primary flows
- [ ] Feature meets measurable outcomes defined in Success Criteria
- [ ] No implementation details leak into specification
## Notes
- Items marked incomplete require spec updates before `/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`
```
b. **Run Validation Check**: Review the spec against each checklist item:
- For each item, determine if it passes or fails
- Document specific issues found (quote relevant spec sections)
c. **Handle Validation Results**:
- **If all items pass**: Mark checklist complete and proceed to step 6
- **If items fail (excluding [NEEDS CLARIFICATION])**:
1. List the failing items and specific issues
2. Update the spec to address each issue
3. Re-run validation until all items pass (max 3 iterations)
4. If still failing after 3 iterations, document remaining issues in checklist notes and warn user
- **If [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers remain**:
1. Extract all [NEEDS CLARIFICATION: ...] markers from the spec
2. **LIMIT CHECK**: If more than 3 markers exist, keep only the 3 most critical (by scope/security/UX impact) and make informed guesses for the rest
3. For each clarification needed (max 3), present options to user in this format:
```markdown
## Question [N]: [Topic]
**Context**: [Quote relevant spec section]
**What we need to know**: [Specific question from NEEDS CLARIFICATION marker]
**Suggested Answers**:
| Option | Answer | Implications |
|--------|--------|--------------|
| A | [First suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| B | [Second suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| C | [Third suggested answer] | [What this means for the feature] |
| Custom | Provide your own answer | [Explain how to provide custom input] |
**Your choice**: _[Wait for user response]_
```
4. **CRITICAL - Table Formatting**: Ensure markdown tables are properly formatted:
- Use consistent spacing with pipes aligned
- Each cell should have spaces around content: `| Content |` not `|Content|`
- Header separator must have at least 3 dashes: `|--------|`
- Test that the table renders correctly in markdown preview
5. Number questions sequentially (Q1, Q2, Q3 - max 3 total)
6. Present all questions together before waiting for responses
7. Wait for user to respond with their choices for all questions (e.g., "Q1: A, Q2: Custom - [details], Q3: B")
8. Update the spec by replacing each [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] marker with the user's selected or provided answer
9. Re-run validation after all clarifications are resolved
d. **Update Checklist**: After each validation iteration, update the checklist file with current pass/fail status
7. Report completion with branch name, spec file path, checklist results, and readiness for the next phase (`/speckit.clarify` or `/speckit.plan`).
**NOTE:** The script creates and checks out the new branch and initializes the spec file before writing.
## General Guidelines
## Quick Guidelines
- Focus on **WHAT** users need and **WHY**.
- Avoid HOW to implement (no tech stack, APIs, code structure).
- Written for business stakeholders, not developers.
- DO NOT create any checklists that are embedded in the spec. That will be a separate command.
### Section Requirements
- **Mandatory sections**: Must be completed for every feature
- **Optional sections**: Include only when relevant to the feature
- When a section doesn't apply, remove it entirely (don't leave as "N/A")
### For AI Generation
When creating this spec from a user prompt:
1. **Make informed guesses**: Use context, industry standards, and common patterns to fill gaps
2. **Document assumptions**: Record reasonable defaults in the Assumptions section
3. **Limit clarifications**: Maximum 3 [NEEDS CLARIFICATION] markers - use only for critical decisions that:
- Significantly impact feature scope or user experience
- Have multiple reasonable interpretations with different implications
- Lack any reasonable default
4. **Prioritize clarifications**: scope > security/privacy > user experience > technical details
5. **Think like a tester**: Every vague requirement should fail the "testable and unambiguous" checklist item
6. **Common areas needing clarification** (only if no reasonable default exists):
- Feature scope and boundaries (include/exclude specific use cases)
- User types and permissions (if multiple conflicting interpretations possible)
- Security/compliance requirements (when legally/financially significant)
**Examples of reasonable defaults** (don't ask about these):
- Data retention: Industry-standard practices for the domain
- Performance targets: Standard web/mobile app expectations unless specified
- Error handling: User-friendly messages with appropriate fallbacks
- Authentication method: Standard session-based or OAuth2 for web apps
- Integration patterns: RESTful APIs unless specified otherwise
### Success Criteria Guidelines
Success criteria must be:
1. **Measurable**: Include specific metrics (time, percentage, count, rate)
2. **Technology-agnostic**: No mention of frameworks, languages, databases, or tools
3. **User-focused**: Describe outcomes from user/business perspective, not system internals
4. **Verifiable**: Can be tested/validated without knowing implementation details
**Good examples**:
- "Users can complete checkout in under 3 minutes"
- "System supports 10,000 concurrent users"
- "95% of searches return results in under 1 second"
- "Task completion rate improves by 40%"
**Bad examples** (implementation-focused):
- "API response time is under 200ms" (too technical, use "Users see results instantly")
- "Database can handle 1000 TPS" (implementation detail, use user-facing metric)
- "React components render efficiently" (framework-specific)
- "Redis cache hit rate above 80%" (technology-specific)
+137
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,137 @@
---
description: Generate an actionable, dependency-ordered tasks.md for the feature based on available design artifacts.
handoffs:
- label: Analyze For Consistency
agent: speckit.analyze
prompt: Run a project analysis for consistency
send: true
- label: Implement Project
agent: speckit.implement
prompt: Start the implementation in phases
send: true
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. **Setup**: Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
2. **Load design documents**: Read from FEATURE_DIR:
- **Required**: plan.md (tech stack, libraries, structure), spec.md (user stories with priorities)
- **Optional**: data-model.md (entities), contracts/ (API endpoints), research.md (decisions), quickstart.md (test scenarios)
- Note: Not all projects have all documents. Generate tasks based on what's available.
3. **Execute task generation workflow**:
- Load plan.md and extract tech stack, libraries, project structure
- Load spec.md and extract user stories with their priorities (P1, P2, P3, etc.)
- If data-model.md exists: Extract entities and map to user stories
- If contracts/ exists: Map endpoints to user stories
- If research.md exists: Extract decisions for setup tasks
- Generate tasks organized by user story (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Generate dependency graph showing user story completion order
- Create parallel execution examples per user story
- Validate task completeness (each user story has all needed tasks, independently testable)
4. **Generate tasks.md**: Use `.specify/templates/tasks-template.md` as structure, fill with:
- Correct feature name from plan.md
- Phase 1: Setup tasks (project initialization)
- Phase 2: Foundational tasks (blocking prerequisites for all user stories)
- Phase 3+: One phase per user story (in priority order from spec.md)
- Each phase includes: story goal, independent test criteria, tests (if requested), implementation tasks
- Final Phase: Polish & cross-cutting concerns
- All tasks must follow the strict checklist format (see Task Generation Rules below)
- Clear file paths for each task
- Dependencies section showing story completion order
- Parallel execution examples per story
- Implementation strategy section (MVP first, incremental delivery)
5. **Report**: Output path to generated tasks.md and summary:
- Total task count
- Task count per user story
- Parallel opportunities identified
- Independent test criteria for each story
- Suggested MVP scope (typically just User Story 1)
- Format validation: Confirm ALL tasks follow the checklist format (checkbox, ID, labels, file paths)
Context for task generation: $ARGUMENTS
The tasks.md should be immediately executable - each task must be specific enough that an LLM can complete it without additional context.
## Task Generation Rules
**CRITICAL**: Tasks MUST be organized by user story to enable independent implementation and testing.
**Tests are OPTIONAL**: Only generate test tasks if explicitly requested in the feature specification or if user requests TDD approach.
### Checklist Format (REQUIRED)
Every task MUST strictly follow this format:
```text
- [ ] [TaskID] [P?] [Story?] Description with file path
```
**Format Components**:
1. **Checkbox**: ALWAYS start with `- [ ]` (markdown checkbox)
2. **Task ID**: Sequential number (T001, T002, T003...) in execution order
3. **[P] marker**: Include ONLY if task is parallelizable (different files, no dependencies on incomplete tasks)
4. **[Story] label**: REQUIRED for user story phase tasks only
- Format: [US1], [US2], [US3], etc. (maps to user stories from spec.md)
- Setup phase: NO story label
- Foundational phase: NO story label
- User Story phases: MUST have story label
- Polish phase: NO story label
5. **Description**: Clear action with exact file path
**Examples**:
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T001 Create project structure per implementation plan`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T005 [P] Implement authentication middleware in src/middleware/auth.py`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T012 [P] [US1] Create User model in src/models/user.py`
- ✅ CORRECT: `- [ ] T014 [US1] Implement UserService in src/services/user_service.py`
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] Create User model` (missing ID and Story label)
- ❌ WRONG: `T001 [US1] Create model` (missing checkbox)
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] [US1] Create User model` (missing Task ID)
- ❌ WRONG: `- [ ] T001 [US1] Create model` (missing file path)
### Task Organization
1. **From User Stories (spec.md)** - PRIMARY ORGANIZATION:
- Each user story (P1, P2, P3...) gets its own phase
- Map all related components to their story:
- Models needed for that story
- Services needed for that story
- Endpoints/UI needed for that story
- If tests requested: Tests specific to that story
- Mark story dependencies (most stories should be independent)
2. **From Contracts**:
- Map each contract/endpoint → to the user story it serves
- If tests requested: Each contract → contract test task [P] before implementation in that story's phase
3. **From Data Model**:
- Map each entity to the user story(ies) that need it
- If entity serves multiple stories: Put in earliest story or Setup phase
- Relationships → service layer tasks in appropriate story phase
4. **From Setup/Infrastructure**:
- Shared infrastructure → Setup phase (Phase 1)
- Foundational/blocking tasks → Foundational phase (Phase 2)
- Story-specific setup → within that story's phase
### Phase Structure
- **Phase 1**: Setup (project initialization)
- **Phase 2**: Foundational (blocking prerequisites - MUST complete before user stories)
- **Phase 3+**: User Stories in priority order (P1, P2, P3...)
- Within each story: Tests (if requested) → Models → Services → Endpoints → Integration
- Each phase should be a complete, independently testable increment
- **Final Phase**: Polish & Cross-Cutting Concerns
+30
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
---
description: Convert existing tasks into actionable, dependency-ordered GitHub issues for the feature based on available design artifacts.
tools: ['github/github-mcp-server/issue_write']
---
## User Input
```text
$ARGUMENTS
```
You **MUST** consider the user input before proceeding (if not empty).
## Outline
1. Run `.specify/scripts/bash/check-prerequisites.sh --json --require-tasks --include-tasks` from repo root and parse FEATURE_DIR and AVAILABLE_DOCS list. All paths must be absolute. For single quotes in args like "I'm Groot", use escape syntax: e.g 'I'\''m Groot' (or double-quote if possible: "I'm Groot").
1. From the executed script, extract the path to **tasks**.
1. Get the Git remote by running:
```bash
git config --get remote.origin.url
```
> [!CAUTION]
> ONLY PROCEED TO NEXT STEPS IF THE REMOTE IS A GITHUB URL
1. For each task in the list, use the GitHub MCP server to create a new issue in the repository that is representative of the Git remote.
> [!CAUTION]
> UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES EVER CREATE ISSUES IN REPOSITORIES THAT DO NOT MATCH THE REMOTE URL
-83
View File
@@ -1,83 +0,0 @@
你是一个专业的 iOS SwiftUI 开发助手,任务是基于 Figma 原型图自动生成 SwiftUI 页面代码,要求如下:
[参数]
- Figma 页面名称: 登录界面
- Swift 页面名称: LoginView
[开发规范]
1. **目录结构**
-`Views/LoginView/` 下创建:
- `LoginView.swift`SwiftUI 页面)
- `LoginViewModel.swift`(如有业务逻辑)
- 所有通用组件(DesignSystem、Scale、FigmaRenderer、FigmaLoader)放在 `Shared/` 文件夹,仅创建一次,后续页面共用。
2. **UI 渲染要求**
- 使用 MCP (Talk-To-Figma) 获取 Figma 节点 JSON 数据并渲染 UI。
- 遵循 Figma 布局顺序(背景 → 图片 → 文本 → 按钮)。
- 必须自适配所有 iPhone 屏幕,使用 `GeometryReader` + 缩放工具。
- 字体、颜色、圆角、阴影、间距等严格跟随 Figma。
- 所有图片用 `Image("ResourceName")`,并加 `.resizable().aspectRatio(contentMode: .fit)`
3. **命名规则**
- Swift 文件、类名、结构体名:`PascalCase`,如 `LoginView`
- 所有图片/图标文件名:`PascalCase`(每个单词首字母大写,不允许 `_``-`)。
- 资源文件夹路径:
```
Assets.xcassets/LoginView{{ImageName}}.imageset/{{ImageName}}.svg
```
例如:
```
Assets.xcassets/LoginViewInitialHero.imageset/InitialHero.svg
```
4. **静态资源处理(SVG 专用)**
- 所有图片/图标资源来自 Figma,格式为 SVG。
- 每个 `.imageset` 文件夹包含:
- `ImageName.svg`
- `Contents.json` 内容如下:
```json
{
"images": [
{
"filename": "ImageName.svg",
"idiom": "universal"
}
],
"info": {
"version": 1,
"author": "xcode"
},
"properties": {
"preserves-vector-representation": true,
"template-rendering-intent": "original"
}
}
```
- 不需要 `@1x/@2x/@3x`,只保留一份 SVG。
- 如果资源缺失,在代码中加 `// TODO: 补充 ImageName.svg 到 Assets.xcassets/LoginView{{ImageName}}.imageset/`。
- 输出末尾列出所有缺失图片清单,格式:
```
[资源清单]
- ImageName.svg → Assets.xcassets/LoginView{{ImageName}}.imageset/ImageName.svg
```
5. **代码生成要求**
- 使用 SwiftUI,代码必须可运行。
- 如果页面已有旧代码,执行**重构**,保持代码整洁。
- 每个 Swift 文件顶部添加注释,说明页面来源(Figma 页面名称)和生成时间。
6. **图片命名优化**
- 所有 Figma 元素名(如 `btn_login`, `icon-home`)自动转换为 PascalCase`BtnLogin``IconHome`)。
- 代码中的 `Image("BtnLogin")` 必须与资源文件夹一致。
7. **最终输出**
- 生成 `LoginView.swift`(完整 SwiftUI 页面实现)。
- 列出缺失的 SVG 资源清单。
- 自动创建 `.imageset` 路径和 `Contents.json` 模板。
- 确保比例缩放和 UI 细节与 Figma 一致。
[任务]
根据以上规范,将 Figma 页面 **登录界面** 转换为 SwiftUI 页面 **LoginView**,并输出:
- 完整的 `LoginView.swift` 代码
- 缺失的 SVG 资源清单
- `.imageset` 文件夹和 `Contents.json` 模板示例
-94
View File
@@ -1,94 +0,0 @@
# AI配置管理功能完成总结
## 任务概述
完成了AI配置管理的两个核心功能:
1.`apiBaseUrl` 字段调整为完整的API URL(无需拼接后缀)
2. 在测试成功后允许保存测试配置参数
## 已完成的工作
### 1. API URL字段调整
**后端修改:**
-`AiConfig.java` - 更新字段注释为"API完整URL"
-`AiConfigCreateRequest.java` - 更新DTO注释
-`AiConfigUpdateRequest.java` - 更新DTO注释
-`AiConfigResponse.java` - 更新DTO注释
-`AiChatServiceImpl.java` - 修改URL构建逻辑,直接使用完整URL
- ✅ 创建单元测试 `AiChatServiceImplTest.java`7个测试全部通过)
**前端修改:**
-`web-admin/src/views/aiconfig/AiConfigList.vue` - 更新表单标签和验证提示
### 2. 测试保存配置功能
**后端实现:**
- ✅ 创建 `AiConfigTestUpdateRequest.java` DTO
-`AiConfigService.java` - 添加 `updateFromTestRequest()` 接口方法
-`AiConfigServiceImpl.java` - 实现参数解析和更新逻辑
-`AiConfigController.java` - 添加 `/aiConfig/updateFromTest` 接口
**前端实现:**
-`web-admin/src/api/aiconfig.ts` - 添加 `updateAiConfigFromTest()` API调用
-`web-admin/src/views/aiconfig/AiConfigList.vue` - 实现保存测试配置功能
- 添加"保存测试配置"按钮(仅在测试成功时显示)
- 实现 `handleSaveTestConfig()` 方法
- 从请求头解析 API Token
- 从请求体解析 bot_id、workflow_id、stream
- 保存自定义请求头和参数为JSON格式
## 测试验证
### 后端测试
```bash
mvn compile -DskipTests # ✅ 编译成功
mvn test -Dtest=AiChatServiceImplTest # ✅ 7个测试全部通过
```
### 前端测试
通过web-admin的AI配置管理页面:
1. 点击配置行的"测试"按钮
2. 修改测试参数(URL、请求头、请求体)
3. 发送测试请求
4. 测试成功后(状态码200),点击"保存测试配置"按钮
5. 配置自动更新到数据库
## 功能特性
### URL处理
- `apiBaseUrl` 现在存储完整的API URL(如:`https://api.coze.cn/v3/chat`
- 无需在调用时拼接任何后缀
- 辅助接口(状态查询、消息查询)自动提取base URL
### 测试保存
- 智能解析请求头中的 Authorization token
- 自动提取请求体中的业务参数(bot_id、workflow_id、stream
- 将自定义请求头和参数保存为JSON格式
- 支持流式和非流式请求测试
## 代码规范遵循
✅ 使用import导包,无全限定名称
✅ 添加类级和方法级注释
✅ Controller层无业务逻辑
✅ 使用Request/Response对象封装参数
✅ 使用LambdaQueryWrapper构造查询
✅ 遵循全局异常处理规范
## 文件清单
### 后端文件
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/entity/AiConfig.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/service/AiConfigService.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/service/impl/AiConfigServiceImpl.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/service/impl/AiChatServiceImpl.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/controller/AiConfigController.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/dto/request/aiconfig/AiConfigCreateRequest.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/dto/request/aiconfig/AiConfigUpdateRequest.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/dto/request/aiconfig/AiConfigTestUpdateRequest.java`
- `backend-single/src/main/java/com/emotion/dto/response/aiconfig/AiConfigResponse.java`
- `backend-single/src/test/java/com/emotion/service/AiChatServiceImplTest.java`
### 前端文件
- `web-admin/src/api/aiconfig.ts`
- `web-admin/src/views/aiconfig/AiConfigList.vue`
## 状态
🎉 **所有任务已完成并通过测试**
+4
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
VITE_APP_ENV=dev
VITE_API_BASE_URL=http://localhost:19089
VITE_WS_URL=ws://localhost:19089
VITE_DEBUG=true
+4
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
VITE_APP_ENV=prod
VITE_API_BASE_URL=http://101.200.208.45:19089/api
VITE_WS_URL=ws://101.200.208.45:19089
VITE_DEBUG=false
-48
View File
@@ -1,48 +0,0 @@
<script lang="uts">
// #ifdef APP-ANDROID || APP-HARMONY
let firstBackTime = 0
// #endif
export default {
onLaunch: function () {
console.log('App Launch')
},
onShow: function () {
console.log('App Show')
},
onHide: function () {
console.log('App Hide')
},
// #ifdef APP-ANDROID || APP-HARMONY
onLastPageBackPress: function () {
console.log('App LastPageBackPress')
if (firstBackTime == 0) {
uni.showToast({
title: '再按一次退出应用',
position: 'bottom',
})
firstBackTime = Date.now()
setTimeout(() => {
firstBackTime = 0
}, 2000)
} else if (Date.now() - firstBackTime < 2000) {
firstBackTime = Date.now()
uni.exit()
}
},
// #endif
onExit: function () {
console.log('App Exit')
},
}
</script>
<style>
/*每个页面公共css */
.uni-row {
flex-direction: row;
}
.uni-column {
flex-direction: column;
}
</style>
+2 -2
View File
@@ -15,6 +15,6 @@
</head> </head>
<body> <body>
<div id="app"><!--app-html--></div> <div id="app"><!--app-html--></div>
<script type="module" src="/main"></script> <script type="module" src="/src/main.js"></script>
</body> </body>
</html> </html>
-9
View File
@@ -1,9 +0,0 @@
import App from './App.uvue'
import { createSSRApp } from 'vue'
export function createApp() {
const app = createSSRApp(App)
return {
app
}
}
+7652
View File
File diff suppressed because it is too large Load Diff
+24
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
{
"name": "emotion-museum-uniapp",
"private": true,
"type": "module",
"scripts": {
"dev:mp-weixin": "NODE_ENV=development VITE_CJS_IGNORE_WARNING=1 VITE_USER_NODE_ENV= UNI_PLATFORM=mp-weixin UNI_INPUT_DIR=src UNI_OUTPUT_DIR=unpackage/dist/dev/mp-weixin UNI_APP_X=false uni -p mp-weixin",
"build:mp-weixin": "NODE_ENV=production VITE_CJS_IGNORE_WARNING=1 VITE_USER_NODE_ENV= UNI_PLATFORM=mp-weixin UNI_INPUT_DIR=src UNI_OUTPUT_DIR=unpackage/dist/build/mp-weixin UNI_APP_X=false uni build -p mp-weixin --outDir unpackage/dist/build/mp-weixin",
"dev:h5": "NODE_ENV=development VITE_CJS_IGNORE_WARNING=1 VITE_USER_NODE_ENV= UNI_PLATFORM=h5 UNI_INPUT_DIR=src UNI_APP_X=false uni -p h5",
"build:h5": "NODE_ENV=production VITE_CJS_IGNORE_WARNING=1 VITE_USER_NODE_ENV= UNI_PLATFORM=h5 UNI_INPUT_DIR=src UNI_APP_X=false uni build -p h5"
},
"dependencies": {
"@dcloudio/uni-app": "3.0.0-alpha-5000120260211001",
"@dcloudio/uni-mp-weixin": "3.0.0-alpha-5000120260211001",
"vue": "3.4.21"
},
"devDependencies": {
"@dcloudio/vite-plugin-uni": "3.0.0-alpha-5000120260211001",
"@vitejs/plugin-vue": "^5.2.0",
"@vue/compiler-sfc": "3.4.21",
"@vue/shared": "3.4.21",
"@vue/server-renderer": "3.4.21",
"vite": "5.2.8"
}
}
-41
View File
@@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
{
"pages": [
{
"path": "pages/home/index",
"style": {
"navigationBarTitleText": "首页"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/login/index",
"style": {
"navigationBarTitleText": "登录"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/splash/index",
"style": {
"navigationBarTitleText": "首页-聊天"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/device-connect/index",
"style": {
"navigationBarTitleText": "设备连接"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/index/index",
"style": {
"navigationBarTitleText": "首页"
}
}
],
"globalStyle": {
"navigationBarTextStyle": "black",
"navigationBarTitleText": "Emotion Museum",
"navigationBarBackgroundColor": "#F8F8F8",
"backgroundColor": "#F8F8F8"
},
"uniIdRouter": {}
}
-24
View File
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
<template>
<view class="container">
<image class="hero" src="/static/devices/search_illustration.png" mode="widthFix"></image>
<view class="status">
<image class="bt" src="/static/devices/bluetooth_off.png"></image>
<text>未连接</text>
</view>
<button class="btn-primary">搜索设备</button>
</view>
</template>
<script>
export default {}
</script>
<style>
.container { padding: 32rpx; }
.hero { width: 100%; margin-bottom: 24rpx; }
.status { display: flex; align-items: center; gap: 12rpx; margin-bottom: 24rpx; }
.bt { width: 40rpx; height: 40rpx; }
.btn-primary { background: #007AFF; color: #fff; border-radius: 12rpx; height: 88rpx; line-height: 88rpx; }
</style>
-24
View File
@@ -1,24 +0,0 @@
<template>
<view class="container">
<image class="banner" src="/static/home/banner.png" mode="widthFix"></image>
<view class="content">
<text class="title">首页</text>
<image class="device-entry" src="/static/devices/device_placeholder.png" mode="widthFix"></image>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script>
export default {
}
</script>
<style>
.container { width: 750rpx; }
.banner { width: 750rpx; }
.content { padding: 24rpx; }
.title { font-size: 32rpx; font-weight: 600; margin-bottom: 16rpx; }
.device-entry { width: 100%; border-radius: 16rpx; }
</style>
-36
View File
@@ -1,36 +0,0 @@
<template>
<view>
<image class="logo" src="/static/logo.png"></image>
<text class="title">{{title}}</text>
</view>
</template>
<script>
export default {
data() {
return {
title: 'Hello'
}
},
onLoad() {
},
methods: {
}
}
</script>
<style>
.logo {
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
margin: 100px auto 25px auto;
}
.title {
font-size: 18px;
color: #8f8f94;
text-align: center;
}
</style>
-45
View File
@@ -1,45 +0,0 @@
<template>
<scroll-view class="container">
<image class="bg" src="/static/auth/login_bg.png" mode="widthFix"></image>
<view class="card">
<image class="illustration" src="/static/auth/login_illustration.png" mode="widthFix"></image>
<view class="inputs">
<input class="input" placeholder="手机号 / 邮箱" />
<view class="password-row">
<input class="input" placeholder="密码" password />
<image class="eye" src="/static/auth/icon_eye_off.png"></image>
</view>
<button class="btn-primary">登录</button>
</view>
</view>
</scroll-view>
</template>
<script>
export default {
data() { return {} },
}
</script>
<style>
.container {
width: 750rpx;
}
.bg { width: 750rpx; }
.card {
margin: 32rpx;
padding: 32rpx;
background: #fff;
border-radius: 24rpx;
box-shadow: 0 8rpx 24rpx rgba(0,0,0,0.06);
}
.illustration { width: 100%; margin-bottom: 24rpx; }
.inputs { display: flex; flex-direction: column; gap: 24rpx; }
.input { height: 88rpx; border: 1rpx solid #eee; border-radius: 12rpx; padding: 0 24rpx; }
.password-row { position: relative; }
.password-row .input { padding-right: 72rpx; }
.eye { position: absolute; right: 24rpx; top: 24rpx; width: 40rpx; height: 40rpx; }
.btn-primary { background: #007AFF; color: #fff; border-radius: 12rpx; height: 88rpx; line-height: 88rpx; }
</style>
-52
View File
@@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
<template>
<view class="container">
<image class="bg" src="/static/splash/background.png" mode="aspectFill"></image>
<view class="overlay">
<image class="logo" src="/static/logo.png" mode="widthFix"></image>
<text class="app-name">Emotion Museum</text>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script>
export default {
onLoad() {},
}
</script>
<style>
.container {
position: relative;
width: 750rpx;
height: 100vh;
}
.bg {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 750rpx;
height: 100vh;
}
.overlay {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
width: 750rpx;
height: 100vh;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.logo {
width: 160rpx;
margin-bottom: 24rpx;
}
.app-name {
font-size: 36rpx;
color: #111;
}
</style>
+35
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
{
"setting": {
"es6": true,
"postcss": true,
"minified": true,
"uglifyFileName": false,
"enhance": true,
"packNpmRelationList": [],
"babelSetting": {
"ignore": [],
"disablePlugins": [],
"outputPath": ""
},
"useCompilerPlugins": false,
"minifyWXML": true,
"compileWorklet": false,
"uploadWithSourceMap": true,
"packNpmManually": false,
"minifyWXSS": true,
"localPlugins": false,
"disableUseStrict": false,
"condition": false,
"swc": false,
"disableSWC": true
},
"compileType": "miniprogram",
"simulatorPluginLibVersion": {},
"packOptions": {
"ignore": [],
"include": []
},
"appid": "wxaf2eaba72d28f0e4",
"editorSetting": {},
"libVersion": "3.14.2"
}
+21
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
{
"libVersion": "3.14.2",
"projectname": "UniApp",
"setting": {
"urlCheck": true,
"coverView": true,
"lazyloadPlaceholderEnable": false,
"skylineRenderEnable": false,
"preloadBackgroundData": false,
"autoAudits": false,
"showShadowRootInWxmlPanel": true,
"compileHotReLoad": true,
"useApiHook": true,
"useStaticServer": false,
"useLanDebug": false,
"showES6CompileOption": false,
"checkInvalidKey": true,
"ignoreDevUnusedFiles": true,
"bigPackageSizeSupport": false
}
}
+207
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,207 @@
<script setup>
import { ref } from 'vue'
import { onLaunch, onShow, onHide } from '@dcloudio/uni-app'
import { useAppStore } from './stores/app.js'
const statusBarHeight = ref(0)
const safeAreaTop = ref(0)
const safeAreaBottom = ref(0)
onLaunch(async () => {
console.log('App Launch')
const store = useAppStore()
await store.initialize()
const systemInfo = uni.getSystemInfoSync()
statusBarHeight.value = systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaTop.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.top || systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaBottom.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.bottom || 0
uni.setStorageSync('statusBarHeight', statusBarHeight.value)
uni.setStorageSync('safeAreaTop', safeAreaTop.value)
uni.setStorageSync('safeAreaBottom', safeAreaBottom.value)
})
onShow(() => {
console.log('App Show')
})
onHide(() => {
console.log('App Hide')
})
</script>
<style>
page {
background-color: #0F071A;
color: #F3E8FF;
font-family: 'Inter', -apple-system, BlinkMacSystemFont, 'Segoe UI', Roboto, sans-serif;
padding-top: 0;
padding-bottom: 0;
}
.status-bar-space {
width: 100%;
background: transparent;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
.safe-area-bottom {
padding-bottom: constant(safe-area-inset-bottom);
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
}
.safe-area-top {
padding-top: constant(safe-area-inset-top);
padding-top: env(safe-area-inset-top);
}
.glass-card {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.05);
backdrop-filter: blur(20px);
-webkit-backdrop-filter: blur(20px);
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.15);
border-radius: 24rpx;
}
.glass-card-gold {
background: linear-gradient(135deg, rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.15), rgba(232, 121, 249, 0.1));
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
border-radius: 32rpx;
}
.glass-input {
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 24rpx;
padding: 24rpx 32rpx;
color: #F3E8FF;
font-size: 28rpx;
}
.glass-input::placeholder {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.btn-primary {
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #9333EA 0%, #7C3AED 100%);
border-radius: 32rpx;
padding: 28rpx 48rpx;
color: white;
font-weight: 600;
font-size: 30rpx;
border: none;
box-shadow: 0 8rpx 32rpx rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
}
.btn-primary:active {
transform: scale(0.98);
opacity: 0.9;
}
.btn-secondary {
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.15);
border-radius: 24rpx;
padding: 24rpx 40rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8);
font-size: 28rpx;
}
.bottom-nav {
background: rgba(15, 7, 26, 0.85);
backdrop-filter: blur(40rpx);
-webkit-backdrop-filter: blur(40rpx);
border-top: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
}
.nav-item {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4);
transition: all 0.3s ease;
}
.nav-item.active {
color: #C084FC;
transform: translateY(-8rpx);
}
.step-indicator {
display: flex;
gap: 12rpx;
}
.step-dot {
width: 24rpx;
height: 8rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 4rpx;
transition: all 0.4s ease;
}
.step-dot.active {
width: 40rpx;
background: #A855F7;
box-shadow: 0 0 24rpx rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.6);
}
.hint-chip {
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 32rpx;
padding: 12rpx 24rpx;
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(243, 232, 255, 0.8);
}
.hint-chip:active {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.2);
border-color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.4);
}
::-webkit-scrollbar {
width: 4rpx;
}
::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
border-radius: 10rpx;
}
@keyframes fadeIn {
from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(20rpx); }
to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }
}
.animate-fade-in {
animation: fadeIn 0.5s ease-out;
}
@keyframes pulse {
0%, 100% { opacity: 0.3; }
50% { opacity: 0.7; }
}
.animate-pulse-slow {
animation: pulse 6s ease-in-out infinite;
}
.text-primary { color: #A855F7; }
.text-primary-light { color: #C084FC; }
.text-accent { color: #E879F9; }
.text-muted { color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4); }
.font-serif { font-family: 'Cinzel', serif; }
.bg-dark { background-color: #0F071A; }
.bg-gradient-purple {
background: linear-gradient(180deg, #1A0B2E 0%, #0F071A 50%, #050208 100%);
}
.safe-area-bottom {
padding-bottom: constant(safe-area-inset-bottom);
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
}
.safe-area-top {
padding-top: constant(safe-area-inset-top);
padding-top: env(safe-area-inset-top);
}
</style>
+84
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
const ENV_TYPE = {
DEV: 'dev',
TEST: 'test',
PROD: 'prod'
}
const normalizeEnv = (value) => {
if (!value) return ENV_TYPE.DEV
if (value === 'development' || value === 'dev') return ENV_TYPE.DEV
if (value === 'production' || value === 'prod') return ENV_TYPE.PROD
if (value === 'test') return ENV_TYPE.TEST
return ENV_TYPE.DEV
}
const currentEnv = normalizeEnv(import.meta.env.VITE_APP_ENV || import.meta.env.MODE)
const envConfig = {
[ENV_TYPE.DEV]: {
API_BASE_URL: 'http://localhost:19089',
WS_URL: 'ws://localhost:19089',
DEBUG: true
},
[ENV_TYPE.TEST]: {
API_BASE_URL: 'http://101.200.208.45:19089/api',
WS_URL: 'ws://101.200.208.45:19089',
DEBUG: true
},
[ENV_TYPE.PROD]: {
API_BASE_URL: 'http://101.200.208.45:19089/api',
WS_URL: 'ws://101.200.208.45:19089',
DEBUG: false
}
}
const getConfig = () => {
const base = envConfig[currentEnv] || envConfig[ENV_TYPE.DEV]
const apiBaseUrl = import.meta.env.VITE_API_BASE_URL || base.API_BASE_URL
const wsUrl = import.meta.env.VITE_WS_URL || base.WS_URL
const debug = import.meta.env.VITE_DEBUG !== undefined
? import.meta.env.VITE_DEBUG === 'true'
: base.DEBUG
return {
API_BASE_URL: apiBaseUrl,
WS_URL: wsUrl,
DEBUG: debug
}
}
const getEnvValue = (key) => {
const config = getConfig()
return config[key]
}
const isDev = () => {
return currentEnv === ENV_TYPE.DEV
}
const isTest = () => {
return currentEnv === ENV_TYPE.TEST
}
const isProd = () => {
return currentEnv === ENV_TYPE.PROD
}
export {
ENV_TYPE,
currentEnv,
getConfig,
getEnvValue,
isDev,
isTest,
isProd
}
export default {
ENV_TYPE,
currentEnv,
getConfig,
getEnvValue,
isDev,
isTest,
isProd
}
+7
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
import App from './App.vue'
import { createSSRApp } from 'vue'
export function createApp() {
const app = createSSRApp(App)
return { app }
}
@@ -5,11 +5,9 @@
"versionName" : "1.0.0", "versionName" : "1.0.0",
"versionCode" : "100", "versionCode" : "100",
"uni-app-x" : {}, "uni-app-x" : {},
/* */
"quickapp" : {}, "quickapp" : {},
/* */
"mp-weixin" : { "mp-weixin" : {
"appid" : "", "appid" : "wxaf2eaba72d28f0e4",
"setting" : { "setting" : {
"urlCheck" : false "urlCheck" : false
}, },
+41
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
{
"pages": [
{
"path": "pages/splash/index",
"style": {
"navigationStyle": "custom"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/login/index",
"style": {
"navigationStyle": "custom"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/onboarding/index",
"style": {
"navigationStyle": "custom"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/main/index",
"style": {
"navigationStyle": "custom"
}
},
{
"path": "pages/profile/index",
"style": {
"navigationBarTitleText": "个人中心"
}
}
],
"globalStyle": {
"navigationBarTextStyle": "white",
"navigationBarTitleText": "人生OS",
"navigationBarBackgroundColor": "#0F071A",
"backgroundColor": "#0F071A"
},
"uniIdRouter": {}
}
+343
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,343 @@
<template>
<view class="login-page">
<view class="status-bar" :style="{ height: statusBarHeight + 'px' }"></view>
<view class="bg-decoration">
<view class="aurora-top"></view>
<view class="aurora-bottom"></view>
</view>
<view class="content" :style="{ paddingTop: safeAreaTop + 20 + 'px' }">
<view class="login-card">
<view class="header">
<text class="title font-serif">欢迎回来</text>
<text class="subtitle">开启你的数字生命档案</text>
</view>
<view class="form">
<view class="input-group">
<text class="input-label">手机号码</text>
<input
class="glass-input"
type="number"
maxlength="11"
placeholder="输入手机号"
v-model="phone"
/>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="input-label">验证码</text>
<view class="code-row">
<input
class="glass-input code-input"
type="number"
maxlength="6"
placeholder="请输入验证码"
v-model="code"
/>
<view
class="code-btn"
:class="{ disabled: isCountingDown || phone.length !== 11 }"
@click="handleGetCode"
>
<text v-if="isCountingDown" class="countdown">{{ countdown }}s</text>
<text v-else>获取验证码</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<view
class="btn-primary login-btn"
:class="{ disabled: !canSubmit || loading }"
@click="handleLogin"
>
<text v-if="loading">登录中...</text>
<text v-else>开启旅程</text>
</view>
<text class="agreement">
登录即代表同意用户协议隐私政策
</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref, computed, onMounted } from 'vue'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
import { getSmsCode } from '../../services/auth.js'
const store = useAppStore()
const statusBarHeight = ref(uni.getStorageSync('statusBarHeight') || 20)
const safeAreaTop = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaTop') || 20)
const safeAreaBottom = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaBottom') || 0)
onMounted(() => {
const systemInfo = uni.getSystemInfoSync()
statusBarHeight.value = systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaTop.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.top || systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaBottom.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.bottom || 0
})
const phone = ref('')
const code = ref('')
const loading = ref(false)
const countdown = ref(60)
const isCountingDown = ref(false)
const canSubmit = computed(() => {
return phone.value.length === 11 && code.value.length === 6
})
const handleGetCode = async () => {
if (isCountingDown.value || loading.value) return
if (phone.value.length !== 11) {
uni.showToast({ title: '请输入正确的手机号', icon: 'none' })
return
}
try {
await getSmsCode(phone.value)
uni.showToast({ title: '验证码已发送', icon: 'success' })
startCountdown()
} catch (error) {
uni.showToast({ title: '验证码已发送 (模拟: 888888)', icon: 'none' })
startCountdown()
}
}
const startCountdown = () => {
isCountingDown.value = true
countdown.value = 60
const timer = setInterval(() => {
countdown.value--
if (countdown.value <= 0) {
clearInterval(timer)
isCountingDown.value = false
}
}, 1000)
}
const handleLogin = async () => {
if (!canSubmit.value || loading.value) return
loading.value = true
try {
const result = await store.login(phone.value, code.value)
if (result.success) {
if (result.hasProfile) {
uni.redirectTo({ url: '/pages/main/index' })
} else {
uni.redirectTo({ url: '/pages/onboarding/index' })
}
} else {
uni.showToast({ title: result.error || '登录失败', icon: 'none' })
}
} catch (error) {
uni.showToast({ title: '登录失败', icon: 'none' })
} finally {
loading.value = false
}
}
</script>
<style scoped>
.login-page {
min-height: 100vh;
background: linear-gradient(180deg, #0F071A 0%, #1A0B2E 50%, #0F071A 100%);
position: relative;
}
.status-bar {
height: constant(safe-area-inset-top);
height: env(safe-area-inset-top);
width: 100%;
background: transparent;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
.bg-decoration {
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
pointer-events: none;
}
.aurora-top {
position: absolute;
top: -10%;
left: -10%;
width: 120%;
height: 60%;
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
filter: blur(120rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.aurora-bottom {
position: absolute;
bottom: -10%;
right: -10%;
width: 100%;
height: 50%;
background: rgba(139, 92, 246, 0.05);
filter: blur(100rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
min-height: 100vh;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
padding: 40rpx;
padding-top: calc(40rpx + constant(safe-area-inset-top));
padding-top: calc(40rpx + env(safe-area-inset-top));
}
.login-card {
width: 100%;
max-width: 720rpx;
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.05);
backdrop-filter: blur(40rpx);
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.15);
border-radius: 48rpx;
padding: 64rpx 40rpx;
}
.header {
text-align: center;
margin-bottom: 64rpx;
}
.title {
display: block;
font-size: 48rpx;
font-weight: 300;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
letter-spacing: 6rpx;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.subtitle {
display: block;
font-size: 28rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4);
font-style: italic;
}
.form {
margin-bottom: 48rpx;
}
.input-group {
margin-bottom: 32rpx;
}
.input-label {
display: block;
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.35);
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.glass-input {
width: 100%;
height: 92rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 24rpx;
padding: 0 32rpx;
color: #F3E8FF;
font-size: 28rpx;
}
.glass-input::placeholder {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.code-row {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
gap: 16rpx;
align-items: stretch;
width: 100%;
}
.code-input {
flex: 1;
width: auto;
min-width: 0;
}
.code-btn {
width: 220rpx;
height: 92rpx;
background: linear-gradient(135deg, rgba(147, 51, 234, 0.5), rgba(124, 58, 237, 0.4));
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.4);
border-radius: 24rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.95);
font-size: 22rpx;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
flex-shrink: 0;
letter-spacing: 2rpx;
transition: all 0.2s ease;
}
.code-btn:active {
transform: scale(0.97);
opacity: 0.85;
}
.code-btn.disabled {
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.countdown {
font-size: 26rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.6);
}
.btn-primary {
width: 100%;
height: 100rpx;
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #9333EA 0%, #7C3AED 100%);
border-radius: 32rpx;
color: white;
font-weight: 600;
font-size: 30rpx;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
border: none;
box-shadow: 0 8rpx 32rpx rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
margin-bottom: 32rpx;
}
.btn-primary.disabled {
opacity: 0.5;
}
.agreement {
display: block;
text-align: center;
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.25);
line-height: 1.6;
}
</style>
+258
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,258 @@
<template>
<view class="path-view">
<text class="page-title">实现路径</text>
<view v-if="!selectedScript" class="empty-state glass-card">
<text class="empty-icon">🗺</text>
<text class="empty-text">先生成剧本方能洞察路径</text>
<button class="btn-secondary empty-btn" @click="goToScript">去生成剧本</button>
</view>
<view v-else-if="!currentPath" class="empty-state glass-card">
<text class="empty-icon">🎯</text>
<text class="empty-text">等待开启人生导航...</text>
</view>
<view v-else class="path-content">
<view class="target-card glass-card-gold">
<text class="target-label">目标{{ currentPath.title }}</text>
<text class="target-summary">{{ (currentPath.description || currentPath.summary || currentPath.content || '').slice(0, 80) }}...</text>
</view>
<view class="timeline">
<view class="timeline-line"></view>
<view
v-for="(step, index) in currentPath.steps"
:key="index"
class="timeline-item"
>
<view class="timeline-dot" :class="{ done: step.done }">
<view class="dot-inner" :class="{ pulse: step.done }"></view>
</view>
<view class="step-card glass-card" :class="{ done: step.done }">
<text class="step-phase">节点 {{ index + 1 }}</text>
<text class="step-task">{{ step.task }}</text>
<text class="step-desc">{{ step.desc }}</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { computed, ref, onMounted, watch } from 'vue'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
import * as lifePathService from '../../services/lifePath.js'
const store = useAppStore()
const pathData = ref(null)
const selectedScript = computed(() => {
return store.scripts.find(s => s.isSelected)
})
const currentPath = computed(() => {
if (pathData.value) return pathData.value
if (store.currentPath) return store.currentPath
return null
})
const loadPath = async (scriptId) => {
if (!scriptId) return
try {
const res = await lifePathService.getPathByScriptId(scriptId)
pathData.value = res.data || null
store.setCurrentPath(pathData.value)
} catch (error) {
pathData.value = null
}
}
const goToScript = () => {
uni.$emit('switchTab', 'script')
}
watch(selectedScript, (val) => {
if (val?.id) {
loadPath(val.id)
} else {
pathData.value = null
}
})
onMounted(() => {
if (selectedScript.value?.id) {
loadPath(selectedScript.value.id)
}
})
</script>
<style scoped>
.path-view {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 32rpx;
}
.page-title {
font-size: 36rpx;
font-weight: 400;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
margin-bottom: 8rpx;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
}
.empty-state {
padding: 120rpx 64rpx;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
gap: 32rpx;
}
.empty-icon {
font-size: 80rpx;
opacity: 0.3;
}
.empty-text {
font-size: 24rpx;
color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.5);
font-style: italic;
text-align: center;
line-height: 1.6;
}
.empty-btn {
font-size: 22rpx;
padding: 18rpx 36rpx;
}
.path-content {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 48rpx;
}
.target-card {
padding: 40rpx;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.target-label {
display: block;
font-size: 18rpx;
color: #C084FC;
font-weight: 600;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.target-summary {
display: block;
font-size: 28rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
line-height: 1.6;
}
.timeline {
position: relative;
padding-left: 60rpx;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 48rpx;
}
.timeline-line {
position: absolute;
left: 30rpx;
top: 30rpx;
bottom: 30rpx;
width: 2rpx;
background: linear-gradient(to bottom, #C084FC, rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.2), transparent);
opacity: 0.3;
}
.timeline-item {
position: relative;
}
.timeline-dot {
position: absolute;
left: -46rpx;
top: 24rpx;
width: 48rpx;
height: 48rpx;
border-radius: 50%;
border: 2rpx solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
background: #0F071A;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
z-index: 2;
}
.timeline-dot.done {
border-color: #C084FC;
box-shadow: 0 0 30rpx rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.4);
}
.dot-inner {
width: 16rpx;
height: 16rpx;
border-radius: 50%;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
}
.dot-inner.done {
background: #C084FC;
}
.dot-inner.pulse {
animation: pulse 2s ease-in-out infinite;
}
@keyframes pulse {
0%, 100% { opacity: 1; transform: scale(1); }
50% { opacity: 0.6; transform: scale(1.2); }
}
.step-card {
padding: 32rpx;
opacity: 0.6;
}
.step-card.done {
opacity: 1;
border-color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.3);
}
.step-phase {
display: block;
font-size: 18rpx;
color: #C084FC;
font-weight: 600;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
margin-bottom: 12rpx;
}
.step-task {
display: block;
font-size: 30rpx;
font-weight: 500;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.95);
margin-bottom: 12rpx;
}
.step-desc {
display: block;
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
line-height: 1.5;
}
</style>
+277
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,277 @@
<template>
<view class="record-view">
<view class="input-card glass-card">
<view class="card-header">
<view class="dot"></view>
<text class="card-title">记叙当下</text>
</view>
<input
class="title-input"
placeholder="为这段记忆命名"
v-model="newEvent.title"
/>
<picker class="date-picker" mode="date" :value="newEvent.time" @change="onDateChange">
<view class="date-value">{{ newEvent.time || '选择日期' }}</view>
</picker>
<textarea
class="content-textarea"
placeholder="此刻的心境或发生的事..."
v-model="newEvent.content"
rows="3"
/>
<button
class="btn-primary save-btn"
:disabled="!canSave"
:class="{ disabled: !canSave }"
@click="saveEvent"
>
镌刻至星海
</button>
</view>
<view class="events-list">
<view
v-for="event in events"
:key="event.id"
class="event-card glass-card"
>
<view class="event-header">
<text class="event-title">{{ event.title }}</text>
<text class="event-date">{{ event.time }}</text>
</view>
<text class="event-content">{{ event.content }}</text>
<view class="ai-reply">
<view class="ai-header">
<text class="ai-icon"></text>
<text class="ai-title">Life Harmony AI</text>
</view>
<text class="ai-content" :class="{ typing: event.isNew }">
{{ event.aiFeedback }}
</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref, computed, onMounted } from 'vue'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
const store = useAppStore()
const newEvent = ref({
title: '',
time: getTodayDate(),
content: ''
})
const events = computed(() => store.events)
const canSave = computed(() => {
return newEvent.value.title && newEvent.value.content
})
function getTodayDate() {
const today = new Date()
return today.toISOString().split('T')[0]
}
const onDateChange = (e) => {
newEvent.value.time = e.detail.value
}
const saveEvent = async () => {
if (!canSave.value) return
const eventData = {
...newEvent.value,
aiFeedback: '星河守望者正在解读这段紫色波频...',
isNew: true
}
await store.createEvent(eventData)
newEvent.value = {
title: '',
time: getTodayDate(),
content: ''
}
setTimeout(async () => {
const fullReply = `这段记忆碎片在星海中漾起涟漪。你在${eventData.title}中展现的特质,正在重新定义你人生OS的底层代码。继续保持这份觉知。`
eventData.aiFeedback = fullReply
eventData.isNew = false
await store.fetchEvents()
}, 1500)
}
onMounted(() => {
store.fetchEvents()
})
</script>
<style scoped>
.record-view {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 32rpx;
}
.input-card {
padding: 32rpx;
}
.card-header {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 12rpx;
margin-bottom: 24rpx;
}
.dot {
width: 16rpx;
height: 16rpx;
background: #C084FC;
border-radius: 50%;
}
.card-title {
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.8);
font-weight: 600;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.title-input {
width: 100%;
height: 80rpx;
background: transparent;
border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.12);
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
font-size: 28rpx;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.title-input::placeholder {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.date-picker {
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.date-value {
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.6);
}
.content-textarea {
width: 100%;
height: 160rpx;
background: transparent;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8);
font-size: 26rpx;
margin-bottom: 24rpx;
}
.content-textarea::placeholder {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.save-btn {
width: 100%;
height: 88rpx;
background: linear-gradient(90deg, rgba(147, 51, 234, 0.4), rgba(124, 58, 237, 0.4));
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
}
.save-btn.disabled {
opacity: 0.5;
}
.events-list {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 24rpx;
}
.event-card {
padding: 32rpx;
}
.event-header {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: flex-start;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.event-title {
font-size: 30rpx;
font-weight: 500;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
}
.event-date {
font-size: 20rpx;
color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.5);
}
.event-content {
display: block;
font-size: 26rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.7);
line-height: 1.6;
margin-bottom: 24rpx;
}
.ai-reply {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.2);
border-radius: 20rpx;
padding: 24rpx;
}
.ai-header {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 8rpx;
margin-bottom: 12rpx;
}
.ai-icon {
font-size: 24rpx;
}
.ai-title {
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.8);
font-weight: 600;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.ai-content {
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(243, 232, 255, 0.8);
font-style: italic;
line-height: 1.5;
}
.ai-content.typing {
animation: typing 2s ease-out;
}
@keyframes typing {
from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(10rpx); }
to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }
}
</style>
+576
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,576 @@
<template>
<view class="script-view">
<text class="page-title font-serif">剧本生成器</text>
<view class="section-card glass-card">
<view class="section-header">
<text class="section-title">我的基础人设</text>
<text class="section-hint">可自由修改</text>
</view>
<view class="profile-grid">
<input
class="glass-input"
placeholder="姓名"
v-model="nickname"
/>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="selector" :range="zodiacOptions" :value="zodiacIndex" @change="onZodiacChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ registrationData.zodiac || '星座' }}</view>
</picker>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="selector" :range="mbtiOptions" :value="mbtiIndex" @change="onMbtiChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ registrationData.mbti || 'MBTI' }}</view>
</picker>
<input
class="glass-input"
placeholder="职业"
v-model="profession"
/>
</view>
</view>
<view class="section-card glass-card">
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">剧本主题</text>
<input
class="glass-input"
placeholder="如:巅峰重现、治愈之旅、赛博觉醒..."
v-model="scriptConfig.theme"
/>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<view class="npc-header">
<text class="label">关键配角/新的人设</text>
<button class="add-btn" @click="addNpc">+ 添加</button>
</view>
<view class="npc-form">
<input
class="glass-input npc-input"
placeholder="姓名"
v-model="npcConfig.name"
/>
<picker class="glass-picker npc-picker" mode="selector" :range="npcRoleOptions" :value="npcRoleIndex" @change="onNpcRoleChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ npcConfig.role || '角色' }}</view>
</picker>
<picker class="glass-picker npc-picker" mode="selector" :range="npcRelationOptions" :value="npcRelationIndex" @change="onNpcRelationChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ npcConfig.relation || '关系' }}</view>
</picker>
</view>
<textarea
class="glass-textarea"
placeholder="自由描述TA的人设特点或关键剧情点..."
v-model="npcConfig.desc"
rows="2"
/>
<view class="npc-list">
<view
v-for="(npc, index) in customNpcs"
:key="index"
class="npc-tag"
>
<text>{{ npc.name }} ({{ npc.role }})</text>
<text class="delete-btn" @click="removeNpc(index)">×</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<view class="params-row">
<view class="param-group">
<text class="param-label">叙事风格</text>
<view class="param-options">
<text
v-for="style in scriptStyles"
:key="style"
class="param-option"
:class="{ active: scriptConfig.style === style }"
@click="scriptConfig.style = style"
>
{{ style }}
</text>
</view>
</view>
<view class="param-group">
<text class="param-label">故事篇幅</text>
<view class="param-options">
<text
v-for="length in scriptLengths"
:key="length"
class="param-option"
:class="{ active: scriptConfig.length === length }"
@click="scriptConfig.length = length"
>
{{ length }}
</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<button
class="btn-primary generate-btn"
:loading="isGenerating"
:disabled="isGenerating || !scriptConfig.theme"
@click="generateScript"
>
<text v-if="isGenerating">命运编织中...</text>
<text v-else>生成平行人生剧本</text>
</button>
</view>
<view v-if="scripts.length > 0" class="scripts-list">
<view
v-for="script in scripts"
:key="script.id"
class="script-card glass-card"
:class="{ selected: script.isSelected }"
>
<view class="script-header">
<text class="script-title">{{ script.title }}</text>
<text class="script-persona">{{ script.theme || '追光者' }}</text>
</view>
<text class="script-summary" lines="3">{{ getScriptSummary(script) }}</text>
<view class="script-footer">
<text class="script-style">{{ script.style || '风格' }}</text>
<button class="select-btn" @click="selectScript(script.id)">
路径映射
</button>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<view v-else-if="!isGenerating" class="empty-state glass-card">
<text class="empty-icon">🎬</text>
<text class="empty-text">尚未生成剧本定义你的未来篇章</text>
</view>
<view v-if="isGenerating" class="generating-state glass-card">
<view class="spinner"></view>
<text class="generating-text">正在采集星海中的深紫色碎屑...</text>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref, computed, reactive, onMounted } from 'vue'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
const store = useAppStore()
const zodiacOptions = ['白羊座', '金牛座', '双子座', '巨蟹座', '狮子座', '处女座', '天秤座', '天蝎座', '射手座', '摩羯座', '水瓶座', '双鱼座']
const mbtiOptions = ['INTJ', 'INTP', 'ENTJ', 'ENTP', 'INFJ', 'INFP', 'ENFJ', 'ENFP', 'ISTJ', 'ISFJ', 'ESTJ', 'ESFJ', 'ISTP', 'ISFP', 'ESTP', 'ESFP']
const npcRoleOptions = ['伙伴', '宿敌', '导师', '挚爱', '下属', '路人']
const npcRelationOptions = ['信任', '对立', '暧昧', '敬畏', '背叛', '守护']
const scriptStyles = ['爽文', '治愈', '热血', '玄幻', '职场', '赛博']
const scriptLengths = ['短篇', '中篇', '长篇', '史诗']
const registrationData = computed(() => store.registrationData || {})
const scripts = computed(() => store.scripts || [])
const nickname = computed({
get: () => registrationData.value.nickname || '',
set: (val) => store.updateRegistration({ nickname: val })
})
const profession = computed({
get: () => registrationData.value.profession || '',
set: (val) => store.updateRegistration({ profession: val })
})
const zodiacIndex = computed(() => zodiacOptions.indexOf(registrationData.value.zodiac))
const mbtiIndex = computed(() => mbtiOptions.indexOf(registrationData.value.mbti))
const scriptConfig = reactive({
theme: '',
style: '爽文',
length: '中篇'
})
const npcConfig = reactive({
name: '',
role: '伙伴',
relation: '信任',
desc: ''
})
const customNpcs = ref([])
const isGenerating = ref(false)
const npcRoleIndex = computed(() => npcRoleOptions.indexOf(npcConfig.role))
const npcRelationIndex = computed(() => npcRelationOptions.indexOf(npcConfig.relation))
const onZodiacChange = (e) => {
store.updateRegistration({ zodiac: zodiacOptions[e.detail.value] })
}
const onMbtiChange = (e) => {
store.updateRegistration({ mbti: mbtiOptions[e.detail.value] })
}
const onNpcRoleChange = (e) => {
npcConfig.role = npcRoleOptions[e.detail.value]
}
const onNpcRelationChange = (e) => {
npcConfig.relation = npcRelationOptions[e.detail.value]
}
const addNpc = () => {
if (npcConfig.name) {
customNpcs.value.push({ ...npcConfig })
npcConfig.name = ''
npcConfig.desc = ''
}
}
const removeNpc = (index) => {
customNpcs.value.splice(index, 1)
}
const generateScript = async () => {
if (!scriptConfig.theme || isGenerating.value) return
isGenerating.value = true
try {
await store.createScript({
theme: scriptConfig.theme,
style: scriptConfig.style,
length: scriptConfig.length,
character: registrationData.value,
events: store.events
})
scriptConfig.theme = ''
} finally {
isGenerating.value = false
}
}
const selectScript = async (id) => {
await store.selectScript(id)
uni.$emit('switchTab', 'path')
}
const getScriptSummary = (script) => {
const text = script.summary || script.content || ''
return text.replace(/\s+/g, ' ').trim()
}
onMounted(async () => {
await store.fetchUserProfile()
await store.fetchEvents()
await store.fetchScripts()
})
</script>
<style scoped>
.script-view {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 32rpx;
}
.page-title {
font-size: 36rpx;
font-weight: 400;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
margin-bottom: 8rpx;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
}
.section-card {
padding: 32rpx;
}
.section-header {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
margin-bottom: 24rpx;
}
.section-title {
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.6);
font-weight: 600;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.section-hint {
font-size: 16rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.35);
font-style: italic;
}
.profile-grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
gap: 16rpx;
}
.glass-input, .glass-picker {
width: 100%;
height: 80rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 16rpx;
padding: 0 24rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
font-size: 26rpx;
}
.glass-input::placeholder {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.picker-value {
line-height: 80rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
}
.input-group {
margin-bottom: 24rpx;
}
.label {
display: block;
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.35);
font-weight: 600;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.npc-header {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.add-btn {
font-size: 20rpx;
color: #C084FC;
border: 1px solid rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.3);
padding: 8rpx 16rpx;
border-radius: 12rpx;
background: transparent;
}
.npc-form {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr 1fr;
gap: 12rpx;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.npc-input, .npc-picker {
height: 72rpx;
padding: 0 16rpx;
font-size: 24rpx;
}
.npc-picker .picker-value {
line-height: 72rpx;
font-size: 24rpx;
}
.glass-textarea {
width: 100%;
height: 120rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 16rpx;
padding: 20rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
font-size: 24rpx;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.npc-list {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 12rpx;
}
.npc-tag {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.1);
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
border-radius: 24rpx;
padding: 8rpx 20rpx;
font-size: 20rpx;
color: rgba(243, 232, 255, 0.8);
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 8rpx;
}
.delete-btn {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4);
font-size: 28rpx;
padding: 0 4rpx;
}
.params-row {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
gap: 24rpx;
margin-bottom: 32rpx;
}
.param-group {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 12rpx;
}
.param-label {
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.35);
margin-left: 8rpx;
}
.param-options {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 12rpx;
}
.param-option {
padding: 10rpx 20rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 16rpx;
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
}
.param-option.active {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.2);
border-color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.5);
color: #C084FC;
}
.generate-btn {
width: 100%;
height: 96rpx;
box-shadow: 0 8rpx 40rpx rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
}
.scripts-list {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 24rpx;
}
.script-card {
padding: 32rpx;
border-left: 4rpx solid transparent;
}
.script-card.selected {
border-left-color: #C084FC;
}
.script-header {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
}
.script-title {
font-size: 32rpx;
font-weight: 500;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
}
.script-persona {
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.6);
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.1);
padding: 6rpx 16rpx;
border-radius: 12rpx;
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.2);
}
.script-summary {
display: block;
font-size: 24rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
line-height: 1.6;
margin-bottom: 24rpx;
}
.script-footer {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
}
.script-style {
font-size: 20rpx;
color: #C084FC;
}
.select-btn {
font-size: 24rpx;
color: #C084FC;
font-weight: 600;
background: transparent;
}
.empty-state {
padding: 80rpx 48rpx;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
gap: 24rpx;
opacity: 0.5;
}
.empty-icon {
font-size: 64rpx;
}
.empty-text {
font-size: 24rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.5);
text-align: center;
}
.generating-state {
padding: 80rpx 48rpx;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
gap: 32rpx;
}
.spinner {
width: 64rpx;
height: 64rpx;
border: 4rpx solid #A855F7;
border-top-color: transparent;
border-radius: 50%;
animation: spin 0.8s linear infinite;
}
@keyframes spin {
from { transform: rotate(0deg); }
to { transform: rotate(360deg); }
}
.generating-text {
font-size: 26rpx;
color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.6);
font-style: italic;
letter-spacing: 2rpx;
}
</style>
+273
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,273 @@
<template>
<view class="main-page">
<view class="bg-decoration">
<view class="aurora-top"></view>
<view class="aurora-bottom"></view>
</view>
<view class="header" :style="{ paddingTop: safeAreaTop + 20 + 'px' }">
<view class="header-left">
<view class="logo-box">
<image class="logo" src="/static/logo.svg" mode="aspectFit" />
</view>
<view class="brand">
<text class="brand-title font-serif">人生OS</text>
<text class="brand-subtitle">LIFE HARMONY v3.1</text>
</view>
</view>
<view class="header-right" @click="goToProfile">
<view class="avatar-box">
<image class="avatar" :src="userAvatar" mode="aspectFill" />
</view>
</view>
</view>
<scroll-view class="page-content" scroll-y>
<view v-if="activeTab === 'record'" class="tab-page">
<RecordView></RecordView>
</view>
<view v-if="activeTab === 'script'" class="tab-page">
<ScriptView></ScriptView>
</view>
<view v-if="activeTab === 'path'" class="tab-page">
<PathView></PathView>
</view>
</scroll-view>
<view class="bottom-nav" :style="{ paddingBottom: safeAreaBottom + 'px' }">
<view
class="nav-item"
:class="{ active: activeTab === 'record' }"
@click="switchTab('record')"
>
<text class="nav-icon">📖</text>
<text class="nav-label">回溯过去</text>
</view>
<view
class="nav-item"
:class="{ active: activeTab === 'script' }"
@click="switchTab('script')"
>
<text class="nav-icon"></text>
<text class="nav-label">创造未来</text>
</view>
<view
class="nav-item"
:class="{ active: activeTab === 'path' }"
@click="switchTab('path')"
>
<text class="nav-icon">🗺</text>
<text class="nav-label">路径实现</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref, computed, onMounted, onUnmounted } from 'vue'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
import RecordView from './RecordView.vue'
import ScriptView from './ScriptView.vue'
import PathView from './PathView.vue'
const store = useAppStore()
const activeTab = ref('record')
const safeAreaTop = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaTop') || 20)
const safeAreaBottom = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaBottom') || 0)
onMounted(() => {
const systemInfo = uni.getSystemInfoSync()
safeAreaTop.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.top || systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaBottom.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.bottom || 0
store.initialize()
uni.$on('switchTab', switchTab)
})
const userAvatar = computed(() => {
const nickname = store.userProfile?.nickname || 'user'
return `https://api.dicebear.com/7.x/avataaars/svg?seed=${nickname}&backgroundColor=A855F7`
})
const switchTab = (tab) => {
activeTab.value = tab
}
onUnmounted(() => {
uni.$off('switchTab', switchTab)
})
const goToProfile = () => {
uni.navigateTo({ url: '/pages/profile/index' })
}
</script>
<style scoped>
.main-page {
min-height: 100vh;
background: linear-gradient(180deg, #0F071A 0%, #1A0B2E 50%, #0F071A 100%);
position: relative;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.bg-decoration {
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
pointer-events: none;
}
.aurora-top {
position: absolute;
top: -10%;
left: -10%;
width: 120%;
height: 60%;
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
filter: blur(120rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.aurora-bottom {
position: absolute;
bottom: -10%;
right: -10%;
width: 100%;
height: 50%;
background: rgba(139, 92, 246, 0.05);
filter: blur(100rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.header {
position: relative;
z-index: 10;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
padding: 24rpx 32rpx;
padding-top: calc(24rpx + constant(safe-area-inset-top));
padding-top: calc(24rpx + env(safe-area-inset-top));
background: rgba(15, 7, 26, 0.6);
backdrop-filter: blur(20rpx);
border-bottom: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
}
.header-left {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 16rpx;
}
.logo-box {
width: 80rpx;
height: 80rpx;
border-radius: 20rpx;
background: linear-gradient(135deg, #9333EA 0%, #7C3AED 100%);
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
overflow: hidden;
}
.logo {
width: 64rpx;
height: 64rpx;
}
.brand-title {
display: block;
font-size: 26rpx;
font-weight: 600;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.9);
letter-spacing: 6rpx;
}
.brand-subtitle {
display: block;
font-size: 16rpx;
color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.6);
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
}
.avatar-box {
width: 72rpx;
height: 72rpx;
border-radius: 50%;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
overflow: hidden;
}
.avatar {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.page-content {
flex: 1;
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
overflow-y: auto;
}
.tab-page {
padding: 32rpx;
padding-bottom: calc(180rpx + constant(safe-area-inset-bottom));
padding-bottom: calc(180rpx + env(safe-area-inset-bottom));
}
.bottom-nav {
position: fixed;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
height: 140rpx;
padding-bottom: constant(safe-area-inset-bottom);
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
background: rgba(15, 7, 26, 0.95);
backdrop-filter: blur(40rpx);
-webkit-backdrop-filter: blur(40rpx);
border-top: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.08);
display: flex;
justify-content: space-around;
align-items: center;
z-index: 100;
}
.nav-item {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
gap: 6rpx;
padding: 16rpx 32rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.4);
transition: all 0.3s ease;
min-width: 160rpx;
}
.nav-item.active {
color: #C084FC;
transform: translateY(-8rpx);
}
.nav-icon {
font-size: 40rpx;
}
.nav-label {
font-size: 18rpx;
font-weight: 600;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.safe-area-bottom {
padding-bottom: constant(safe-area-inset-bottom);
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
}
</style>
+657
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,657 @@
<template>
<view class="onboarding-page">
<view class="bg-decoration">
<view class="aurora-top"></view>
<view class="aurora-bottom"></view>
</view>
<view class="content" :style="{ paddingTop: safeAreaTop + 20 + 'px', paddingBottom: safeAreaBottom + 20 + 'px' }">
<scroll-view class="step-content" scroll-y>
<view class="step-inner">
<view v-if="currentStep === 1" class="step animate-fade-in">
<view class="step-header">
<text class="step-title font-serif">系统初始化</text>
<text class="step-subtitle">定义你在人生OS中的唯一代码</text>
</view>
<view class="form-grid">
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">你的昵称</text>
<input
class="glass-input"
placeholder="输入昵称"
v-model="formData.nickname"
/>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">性别</text>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="selector" :range="genderOptions" :value="genderIndex" @change="onGenderChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ formData.gender || '请选择' }}</view>
</picker>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">星座</text>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="selector" :range="zodiacOptions" :value="zodiacIndex" @change="onZodiacChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ formData.zodiac || '请选择' }}</view>
</picker>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">MBTI人格</text>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="selector" :range="mbtiOptions" :value="mbtiIndex" @change="onMbtiChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ formData.mbti || '请选择' }}</view>
</picker>
</view>
<view class="input-group full-width">
<text class="label">兴趣爱好</text>
<input
class="glass-input"
placeholder="用逗号分隔,如:阅读,旅行,摄影"
v-model="hobbiesText"
/>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<view v-if="currentStep === 2" class="step animate-fade-in">
<view class="step-header">
<text class="step-title font-serif">回溯起源</text>
<text class="step-subtitle">一段让你感到温暖的早期时光</text>
</view>
<view class="memory-form">
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">日期</text>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="date" :value="formData.childhood.date" @change="onChildhoodDateChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ formData.childhood.date || '请选择日期' }}</view>
</picker>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">回忆一段具体且温暖的午后...</text>
<textarea
class="glass-textarea"
rows="4"
placeholder="描述那段时光..."
v-model="formData.childhood.text"
/>
</view>
<view class="hint-section">
<view class="hint-title">
<text class="icon"></text>
<text>灵感气泡</text>
</view>
<view class="hint-tags">
<text
v-for="(hint, index) in childhoodHints"
:key="index"
class="hint-tag"
@click="addChildhoodHint(hint)"
>
{{ hint }}
</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<view v-if="currentStep === 3" class="step animate-fade-in">
<view class="step-header">
<text class="step-title font-serif">悦然时刻</text>
<text class="step-subtitle">一段感受到生命跃动的经历</text>
</view>
<view class="memory-form">
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">日期</text>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="date" :value="formData.joy.date" @change="onJoyDateChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ formData.joy.date || '请选择日期' }}</view>
</picker>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">想一个令你会心一笑的瞬间...</text>
<textarea
class="glass-textarea"
rows="4"
placeholder="描述那个瞬间..."
v-model="formData.joy.text"
/>
</view>
<view class="hint-section">
<view class="hint-title">
<text class="icon"></text>
<text>灵感气泡</text>
</view>
<view class="hint-tags">
<text
v-for="(hint, index) in joyHints"
:key="index"
class="hint-tag"
@click="addJoyHint(hint)"
>
{{ hint }}
</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<view v-if="currentStep === 4" class="step animate-fade-in">
<view class="step-header">
<text class="step-title font-serif">破茧成蝶</text>
<text class="step-subtitle">在宁静中默默积蓄力量的日子</text>
</view>
<view class="memory-form">
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">日期</text>
<picker class="glass-picker" mode="date" :value="formData.low.date" @change="onLowDateChange">
<view class="picker-value">{{ formData.low.date || '请选择日期' }}</view>
</picker>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">描述那段有些艰难但让你成长的日子...</text>
<textarea
class="glass-textarea"
rows="4"
placeholder="描述那段经历..."
v-model="formData.low.text"
/>
</view>
<view class="hint-section">
<view class="hint-title">
<text class="icon"></text>
<text>灵感气泡</text>
</view>
<view class="hint-tags">
<text
v-for="(hint, index) in lowHints"
:key="index"
class="hint-tag"
@click="addLowHint(hint)"
>
{{ hint }}
</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
<view v-if="currentStep === 5" class="step animate-fade-in">
<view class="step-header">
<text class="step-title font-serif">未来憧憬</text>
<text class="step-subtitle">对未来理想生活状态的预见</text>
</view>
<view class="memory-form">
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">你想成为怎样的人</text>
<textarea
class="glass-textarea"
rows="3"
placeholder="描述你对未来的愿景..."
v-model="formData.future.vision"
/>
</view>
<view class="input-group">
<text class="label">你的理想生活状态</text>
<textarea
class="glass-textarea"
rows="3"
placeholder="描述理想的一天..."
v-model="formData.future.ideal"
/>
</view>
<view class="quote-box">
<text class="quote-icon"></text>
<text class="quote-text">"照见未来,便是创造的开始。"</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</scroll-view>
<view class="bottom-bar">
<view class="step-dots">
<view
v-for="step in 5"
:key="step"
class="step-dot"
:class="{ active: currentStep === step }"
/>
</view>
<view class="actions">
<button
v-if="currentStep > 1"
class="btn-secondary"
@click="prevStep"
>
返回
</button>
<button
class="btn-primary next-btn"
:loading="isSaving"
@click="nextStep"
>
<text v-if="currentStep === 5">{{ isSaving ? '保存中...' : '开启人生' }}</text>
<text v-else>继续</text>
</button>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref, computed, reactive, onMounted, watch } from 'vue'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
import * as lifeEventService from '../../services/lifeEvent.js'
const store = useAppStore()
const safeAreaTop = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaTop') || 20)
const safeAreaBottom = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaBottom') || 0)
onMounted(async () => {
const systemInfo = uni.getSystemInfoSync()
safeAreaTop.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.top || systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaBottom.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.bottom || 0
await store.fetchUserProfile()
Object.assign(formData, store.registrationData)
currentStep.value = store.currentStep || 1
})
const currentStep = ref(store.currentStep || 1)
const isSaving = ref(false)
const formData = reactive({
nickname: '',
gender: '',
mbti: '',
zodiac: '',
profession: '',
hobbies: [],
childhood: { date: '', text: '' },
joy: { date: '', text: '' },
low: { date: '', text: '' },
future: { vision: '', ideal: '' }
})
const genderOptions = ['男', '女']
const zodiacOptions = ['白羊座', '金牛座', '双子座', '巨蟹座', '狮子座', '处女座', '天秤座', '天蝎座', '射手座', '摩羯座', '水瓶座', '双鱼座']
const mbtiOptions = ['INTJ', 'INTP', 'ENTJ', 'ENTP', 'INFJ', 'INFP', 'ENFJ', 'ENFP', 'ISTJ', 'ISFJ', 'ESTJ', 'ESFJ', 'ISTP', 'ISFP', 'ESTP', 'ESFP']
const childhoodHints = ['秘密花园', '老旧弄堂', '秋千', '夏蝉', '被保护的', '好奇心']
const joyHints = ['突破', '共鸣', '清晨阳光', '认可', '旅行终点', '深呼吸']
const lowHints = ['迷茫', '无力感', '雨后街道', '重新出发', '裂痕中的光', '蜕变']
const hobbiesText = computed({
get: () => formData.hobbies.join(''),
set: (val) => {
formData.hobbies = val.split(/[,]/).map(s => s.trim()).filter(s => s)
}
})
const genderIndex = computed(() => genderOptions.indexOf(formData.gender))
const zodiacIndex = computed(() => zodiacOptions.indexOf(formData.zodiac))
const mbtiIndex = computed(() => mbtiOptions.indexOf(formData.mbti))
const onGenderChange = (e) => {
formData.gender = genderOptions[e.detail.value]
}
const onZodiacChange = (e) => {
formData.zodiac = zodiacOptions[e.detail.value]
}
const onMbtiChange = (e) => {
formData.mbti = mbtiOptions[e.detail.value]
}
const onChildhoodDateChange = (e) => {
formData.childhood.date = e.detail.value
}
const onJoyDateChange = (e) => {
formData.joy.date = e.detail.value
}
const onLowDateChange = (e) => {
formData.low.date = e.detail.value
}
const addChildhoodHint = (hint) => {
formData.childhood.text += hint + ' '
}
const addJoyHint = (hint) => {
formData.joy.text += hint + ' '
}
const addLowHint = (hint) => {
formData.low.text += hint + ' '
}
const prevStep = () => {
if (currentStep.value > 1) {
saveStepData()
currentStep.value--
}
}
const nextStep = async () => {
saveStepData()
if (currentStep.value < 5) {
currentStep.value++
} else {
isSaving.value = true
try {
const result = await store.saveUserProfile()
if (result.success) {
const eventsToSave = [
{ data: formData.childhood, type: 'childhood', title: '童年记忆' },
{ data: formData.joy, type: 'joy', title: '光芒闪耀的时刻' },
{ data: formData.low, type: 'low', title: '在暗夜中潜行' }
]
await Promise.all(
eventsToSave.map(({ data, type, title }) => {
if (!data?.date || !data?.text) return Promise.resolve()
return lifeEventService.createEvent({
title,
time: data.date,
content: data.text,
eventType: 'milestone',
tags: [type]
})
})
)
await store.fetchEvents()
uni.showToast({ title: '欢迎开启人生OS', icon: 'success' })
setTimeout(() => {
uni.redirectTo({ url: '/pages/main/index' })
}, 1500)
} else {
uni.showToast({ title: result.error || '保存失败', icon: 'none' })
}
} catch (error) {
uni.showToast({ title: '保存失败', icon: 'none' })
} finally {
isSaving.value = false
}
}
}
const saveStepData = () => {
store.updateRegistration({ ...formData })
}
watch(currentStep, (val) => {
store.setCurrentStep(val)
})
</script>
<style scoped>
.onboarding-page {
min-height: 100vh;
background: linear-gradient(180deg, #0F071A 0%, #1A0B2E 50%, #0F071A 100%);
position: relative;
}
.bg-decoration {
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
pointer-events: none;
}
.aurora-top {
position: absolute;
top: -10%;
left: -10%;
width: 120%;
height: 60%;
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
filter: blur(120rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.aurora-bottom {
position: absolute;
bottom: -10%;
right: -10%;
width: 100%;
height: 50%;
background: rgba(139, 92, 246, 0.05);
filter: blur(100rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
min-height: 100vh;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
padding: 40rpx;
padding-top: calc(40rpx + constant(safe-area-inset-top));
padding-top: calc(40rpx + env(safe-area-inset-top));
}
.step-content {
flex: 1;
overflow-y: auto;
}
.step-inner {
padding-bottom: 40rpx;
}
.step {
animation: fadeIn 0.5s ease-out;
}
@keyframes fadeIn {
from { opacity: 0; transform: translateY(20rpx); }
to { opacity: 1; transform: translateY(0); }
}
.step-header {
margin-bottom: 48rpx;
}
.step-title {
display: block;
font-size: 46rpx;
font-weight: 400;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.95);
margin-bottom: 12rpx;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
}
.step-subtitle {
display: block;
font-size: 24rpx;
color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.6);
font-style: italic;
}
.form-grid {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
gap: 24rpx;
}
.full-width {
grid-column: 1 / -1;
}
.input-group {
margin-bottom: 8rpx;
}
.label {
display: block;
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.35);
margin-bottom: 12rpx;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.glass-input, .glass-picker {
width: 100%;
height: 88rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 20rpx;
padding: 0 24rpx;
color: #F3E8FF;
font-size: 28rpx;
}
.glass-input::placeholder {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.picker-value {
line-height: 88rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8);
}
.glass-textarea {
width: 100%;
height: 200rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 20rpx;
padding: 24rpx;
color: #F3E8FF;
font-size: 28rpx;
}
.glass-textarea::placeholder {
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.memory-form {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 24rpx;
}
.hint-section {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.15);
border-radius: 32rpx;
padding: 32rpx;
margin-top: 16rpx;
box-shadow: inset 0 0 30rpx rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
}
.hint-title {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 8rpx;
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(192, 132, 252, 0.6);
text-transform: uppercase;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
margin-bottom: 20rpx;
}
.icon {
font-size: 24rpx;
}
.hint-tags {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
gap: 16rpx;
}
.hint-tag {
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 32rpx;
padding: 10rpx 22rpx;
font-size: 22rpx;
color: rgba(243, 232, 255, 0.8);
}
.hint-tag:active {
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.2);
border-color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.4);
}
.quote-box {
background: linear-gradient(135deg, rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.15), rgba(232, 121, 249, 0.1));
border: 1px solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
border-radius: 20rpx;
padding: 32rpx;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 16rpx;
margin-top: 16rpx;
}
.quote-icon {
font-size: 32rpx;
}
.quote-text {
font-size: 26rpx;
color: rgba(243, 232, 255, 0.7);
font-style: italic;
}
.bottom-bar {
padding-top: 32rpx;
padding-bottom: constant(safe-area-inset-bottom);
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
border-top: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.05);
}
.step-dots {
display: flex;
gap: 8rpx;
margin-bottom: 32rpx;
}
.step-dot {
flex: 1;
height: 8rpx;
background: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 4rpx;
transition: all 0.4s ease;
}
.step-dot.active {
flex: 1;
height: 8rpx;
background: #A855F7;
box-shadow: 0 0 24rpx rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.6);
}
.actions {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
gap: 24rpx;
align-items: center;
}
.next-btn {
min-width: 200rpx;
}
</style>
+296
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,296 @@
<template>
<view class="profile-page">
<view class="bg-decoration">
<view class="aurora-top"></view>
<view class="aurora-bottom"></view>
</view>
<scroll-view class="content" scroll-y :style="{ paddingTop: safeAreaTop + 20 + 'px', paddingBottom: safeAreaBottom + 20 + 'px' }">
<view class="user-card">
<view class="avatar-box">
<image class="avatar" :src="userAvatar" mode="aspectFill" />
<view class="verified-badge"></view>
</view>
<view class="user-info">
<text class="nickname font-serif">{{ userProfile.nickname || '未同步系统' }}</text>
<text class="user-tags">{{ userTags }}</text>
</view>
</view>
<view class="stats-row">
<view class="stat-card glass-card">
<text class="stat-label">觉醒深度</text>
<text class="stat-value">Lv.4</text>
</view>
<view class="stat-card glass-card">
<text class="stat-label">星历契合</text>
<text class="stat-value">98%</text>
</view>
</view>
<view class="menu-list">
<view class="menu-item glass-card" @click="editProfile">
<view class="menu-left">
<text class="menu-icon">👤</text>
<text class="menu-title">个人档案设置</text>
</view>
<text class="menu-arrow"></text>
</view>
<view class="menu-item glass-card">
<view class="menu-left">
<text class="menu-icon">🔄</text>
<text class="menu-title">多账号切换</text>
</view>
<text class="menu-arrow"></text>
</view>
<view class="menu-item glass-card">
<view class="menu-left">
<text class="menu-icon">📧</text>
<text class="menu-title">与开发者对话</text>
</view>
<text class="menu-arrow"></text>
</view>
</view>
<button class="logout-btn" @click="handleLogout">
TERMINATE LIFE HARMONY
</button>
</scroll-view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { computed, ref, onMounted } from 'vue'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
const store = useAppStore()
const safeAreaTop = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaTop') || 20)
const safeAreaBottom = ref(uni.getStorageSync('safeAreaBottom') || 0)
onMounted(() => {
const systemInfo = uni.getSystemInfoSync()
safeAreaTop.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.top || systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaBottom.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.bottom || 0
})
const userProfile = computed(() => store.userProfile || {})
const userAvatar = computed(() => {
const nickname = userProfile.value.nickname || 'user'
return `https://api.dicebear.com/7.x/avataaars/svg?seed=${nickname}&backgroundColor=A855F7`
})
const userTags = computed(() => {
const { mbti, zodiac, profession } = userProfile.value
const tags = [mbti || 'QUESTER', zodiac || 'STAR', profession || '星民']
return tags.join(' · ')
})
const editProfile = () => {
uni.navigateTo({ url: '/pages/onboarding/index?edit=1' })
}
const handleLogout = () => {
uni.showModal({
title: '确认退出',
content: '确定要退出登录吗?',
success: async (res) => {
if (res.confirm) {
await store.logout()
uni.reLaunch({ url: '/pages/login/index' })
}
}
})
}
</script>
<style scoped>
.profile-page {
min-height: 100vh;
background: linear-gradient(180deg, #0F071A 0%, #1A0B2E 50%, #0F071A 100%);
position: relative;
}
.bg-decoration {
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
pointer-events: none;
}
.aurora-top {
position: absolute;
top: -10%;
left: -10%;
width: 120%;
height: 60%;
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
filter: blur(120rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.aurora-bottom {
position: absolute;
bottom: -10%;
right: -10%;
width: 100%;
height: 50%;
background: rgba(139, 92, 246, 0.05);
filter: blur(100rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.content {
position: relative;
z-index: 1;
padding: 40rpx;
padding-top: calc(60rpx + constant(safe-area-inset-top));
padding-top: calc(60rpx + env(safe-area-inset-top));
padding-bottom: constant(safe-area-inset-bottom);
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
}
.user-card {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
padding: 48rpx 0;
margin-bottom: 32rpx;
}
.avatar-box {
position: relative;
width: 160rpx;
height: 160rpx;
border-radius: 50%;
border: 4rpx solid rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.3);
padding: 8rpx;
margin-bottom: 32rpx;
}
.avatar {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
border-radius: 50%;
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.1);
}
.verified-badge {
position: absolute;
bottom: 8rpx;
right: 8rpx;
width: 40rpx;
height: 40rpx;
background: #9333EA;
border-radius: 50%;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
font-size: 20rpx;
color: white;
border: 4rpx solid #0F071A;
}
.user-info {
text-align: center;
}
.nickname {
display: block;
font-size: 40rpx;
font-weight: 300;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.95);
margin-bottom: 16rpx;
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
}
.user-tags {
display: block;
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.6);
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.stats-row {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
gap: 24rpx;
margin-bottom: 48rpx;
}
.stat-card {
padding: 32rpx;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
gap: 12rpx;
}
.stat-label {
font-size: 18rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.35);
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.stat-value {
font-size: 36rpx;
font-weight: 300;
color: rgba(243, 232, 255, 0.9);
}
.menu-list {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
gap: 20rpx;
margin-bottom: 64rpx;
}
.menu-item {
padding: 32rpx;
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
align-items: center;
}
.menu-left {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
gap: 24rpx;
}
.menu-icon {
font-size: 32rpx;
}
.menu-title {
font-size: 26rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.8);
}
.menu-arrow {
font-size: 32rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
}
.logout-btn {
width: 100%;
padding: 32rpx;
background: transparent;
border: 1px solid rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.1);
border-radius: 24rpx;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.3);
font-size: 20rpx;
letter-spacing: 6rpx;
text-transform: uppercase;
}
.logout-btn:active {
color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.5);
border-color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.2);
}
</style>
+131
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,131 @@
<template>
<view class="container">
<view class="bg-decoration">
<view class="aurora-top"></view>
<view class="aurora-bottom"></view>
</view>
<view class="overlay">
<view class="status-bar-space" :style="{ height: statusBarHeight + 'px' }"></view>
<view class="content-area" :style="{ paddingBottom: safeAreaBottom + 'px' }">
<image class="logo" src="/static/logo.svg" mode="widthFix"></image>
<text class="app-name font-serif">人生OS</text>
<text class="app-version">LIFE HARMONY v3.1</text>
</view>
</view>
</view>
</template>
<script setup>
import { ref } from 'vue'
import { onLoad } from '@dcloudio/uni-app'
import { useAppStore } from '../../stores/app.js'
const statusBarHeight = ref(20)
const safeAreaBottom = ref(0)
onLoad(() => {
const systemInfo = uni.getSystemInfoSync()
statusBarHeight.value = systemInfo.statusBarHeight || 20
safeAreaBottom.value = systemInfo.safeAreaInsets?.bottom || 0
setTimeout(async () => {
const store = useAppStore()
const token = uni.getStorageSync('access_token')
if (token) {
await store.fetchUserProfile()
if (store.hasProfile) {
uni.reLaunch({ url: '/pages/main/index' })
} else {
uni.reLaunch({ url: '/pages/onboarding/index' })
}
} else {
uni.reLaunch({ url: '/pages/login/index' })
}
}, 2000)
})
</script>
<style>
.container {
position: relative;
width: 750rpx;
min-height: 100vh;
height: 100vh;
background: linear-gradient(180deg, #0F071A 0%, #1A0B2E 50%, #0F071A 100%);
}
.status-bar-space {
height: constant(safe-area-inset-top);
height: env(safe-area-inset-top);
width: 100%;
background: transparent;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
.bg-decoration {
position: absolute;
inset: 0;
pointer-events: none;
}
.aurora-top {
position: absolute;
top: -10%;
left: -10%;
width: 120%;
height: 60%;
background: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.08);
filter: blur(120rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.aurora-bottom {
position: absolute;
bottom: -10%;
right: -10%;
width: 100%;
height: 50%;
background: rgba(139, 92, 246, 0.05);
filter: blur(100rpx);
border-radius: 50%;
}
.overlay {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
z-index: 1;
}
.content-area {
flex: 1;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
padding-bottom: constant(safe-area-inset-bottom);
padding-bottom: env(safe-area-inset-bottom);
}
.logo {
width: 180rpx;
margin-bottom: 32rpx;
}
.app-name {
font-size: 52rpx;
font-weight: 300;
color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.95);
letter-spacing: 8rpx;
margin-bottom: 20rpx;
}
.app-version {
font-size: 24rpx;
color: rgba(168, 85, 247, 0.7);
letter-spacing: 4rpx;
}
</style>
+123
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
/**
* 认证服务
* 处理登录、注册、验证码等认证相关接口
* 与Web端(life-script/src/services/auth.js)保持一致
*/
import { get, post } from './request.js'
/**
* 获取短信验证码
* @param {string} phone - 手机号
* @returns {Promise<Object>} 验证码响应
*/
export const getSmsCode = async (phone) => {
const response = await get('/auth/sms-code', { phone })
return response
}
/**
* 用户登录(手机号 + 验证码)
* @param {Object} params - 登录参数
* @param {string} params.phone - 手机号
* @param {string} params.smsCode - 短信验证码
* @returns {Promise<Object>} 登录响应(包含 token
*/
export const login = async ({ phone, smsCode }) => {
const response = await post('/auth/login', { phone, smsCode })
// 保存token
if (response.data) {
const { accessToken, refreshToken } = response.data
if (accessToken) {
uni.setStorageSync('access_token', accessToken)
}
if (refreshToken) {
uni.setStorageSync('refresh_token', refreshToken)
}
}
return response
}
/**
* 用户登出
* @returns {Promise<void>}
*/
export const logout = async () => {
try {
await post('/auth/logout')
} finally {
// 无论成功失败都清除本地token
uni.removeStorageSync('access_token')
uni.removeStorageSync('refresh_token')
}
}
/**
* 刷新token
* @returns {Promise<Object>} 新的token
*/
export const refreshToken = async () => {
const refreshToken = uni.getStorageSync('refresh_token')
if (!refreshToken) {
throw new Error('No refresh token')
}
const response = await post('/auth/refreshToken', { refreshToken })
// 更新token
if (response.data) {
const { accessToken, refreshToken: newRefreshToken } = response.data
if (accessToken) {
uni.setStorageSync('access_token', accessToken)
}
if (newRefreshToken) {
uni.setStorageSync('refresh_token', newRefreshToken)
}
}
return response
}
/**
* 验证token是否有效
* @returns {Promise<boolean>}
*/
export const validateToken = async () => {
try {
const response = await get('/auth/validateToken')
return response.data === true
} catch {
return false
}
}
/**
* 获取当前用户信息
* @returns {Promise<Object>} 用户信息
*/
export const getCurrentUserInfo = async () => {
const response = await get('/auth/userInfo')
return response
}
/**
* 检查手机号是否已注册
* @param {string} phone - 手机号
* @returns {Promise<boolean>}
*/
export const checkPhone = async (phone) => {
const response = await get('/auth/checkPhone', { phone })
return response.data
}
export default {
getSmsCode,
login,
logout,
refreshToken,
validateToken,
getCurrentUserInfo,
checkPhone
}
+202
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,202 @@
/**
* 爽文剧本服务
* 处理剧本的增删改查
*/
import { get, post, put, del } from './request.js'
export const getScriptList = async () => {
const response = await get('/epicScript/listAll')
return response
}
export const getScriptPage = async ({ pageNum = 1, pageSize = 10 }) => {
const response = await get('/epicScript/page', { pageNum, pageSize })
return response
}
export const getScriptById = async (id) => {
const response = await get('/epicScript/detail', { id })
return response
}
export const createScript = async (scriptData) => {
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(scriptData)
const response = await post('/epicScript/create', requestData)
return response
}
export const updateScript = async (scriptData) => {
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(scriptData)
const response = await put('/epicScript/update', requestData)
return response
}
export const selectScript = async (id) => {
const response = await put('/epicScript/select', null, { params: { id } })
return response
}
export const deleteScript = async (id) => {
const response = await del('/epicScript/delete', { id })
return response
}
const transformToBackendFormat = (frontendData) => {
const {
id,
theme,
style,
length,
content,
isSelected,
character,
events
} = frontendData
let title = theme || '我的剧本'
let plotIntro = ''
let plotTurning = ''
let plotClimax = ''
let plotEnding = ''
if (content) {
const sections = content.split(/【[^】]+】/)
const titles = content.match(/【[^】]+】/g) || []
titles.forEach((t, index) => {
const sectionContent = sections[index + 1]?.trim() || ''
if (t.includes('序幕') || t.includes('低谷')) {
plotIntro = sectionContent
} else if (t.includes('转折') || t.includes('契机')) {
plotTurning = sectionContent
} else if (t.includes('高潮') || t.includes('抉择')) {
plotClimax = sectionContent
} else if (t.includes('结局') || t.includes('开始')) {
plotEnding = sectionContent
}
})
}
let characterInfo = ''
if (character) {
const parts = [
`姓名:${character.nickname || '未设置'}`,
`性别:${character.gender || '未设置'}`,
`MBTI${character.mbti || '未设置'}`,
`星座:${character.zodiac || '未设置'}`,
`职业:${character.profession || '未设置'}`,
`兴趣爱好:${character.hobbies?.join(',') || '无'}`
]
if (character.future) {
if (character.future.vision) parts.push(`未来愿景:${character.future.vision}`)
if (character.future.ideal) parts.push(`理想生活:${character.future.ideal}`)
}
characterInfo = parts.join('\n')
}
let lifeEventsSummary = ''
const eventParts = []
if (character) {
if (character.childhood?.text) {
eventParts.push(`【童年记忆】(${character.childhood.date || '未知时间'}): ${character.childhood.text}`)
}
if (character.joy?.text) {
eventParts.push(`【高光时刻】(${character.joy.date || '未知时间'}): ${character.joy.text}`)
}
if (character.low?.text) {
eventParts.push(`【至暗时刻】(${character.low.date || '未知时间'}): ${character.low.text}`)
}
}
if (events && Array.isArray(events)) {
events.forEach(e => {
const dateStr = e.time || e.eventDate || '未知时间'
const titleStr = e.title || '无标题'
const contentStr = e.content || ''
eventParts.push(`【人生事件】(${dateStr}) ${titleStr}${contentStr ? ': ' + contentStr : ''}`)
})
}
lifeEventsSummary = eventParts.join('\n')
return {
id,
title,
theme,
style,
length,
plotIntro,
plotTurning,
plotClimax,
plotEnding,
plotJson: content ? { fullContent: content } : null,
isSelected,
characterInfo,
lifeEventsSummary
}
}
export const transformToFrontendFormat = (backendData) => {
if (!backendData) return null
const {
id,
userId,
title,
theme,
style,
length,
plotIntro,
plotTurning,
plotClimax,
plotEnding,
plotJson,
isSelected,
createTime
} = backendData
let content = ''
if (plotJson?.fullContent) {
content = plotJson.fullContent
} else {
const parts = []
if (plotIntro) parts.push(`【序幕:低谷回响】\n${plotIntro}`)
if (plotTurning) parts.push(`【转折:契机出现】\n${plotTurning}`)
if (plotClimax) parts.push(`【高潮:命运抉择】\n${plotClimax}`)
if (plotEnding) parts.push(`【结局:新的开始】\n${plotEnding}`)
content = parts.join('\n\n')
}
return {
id,
userId,
title: title || theme || '未命名剧本',
theme: theme || '',
style: style || '',
length: length || 'medium',
content,
isSelected: isSelected || false,
date: createTime ? new Date(createTime).toLocaleDateString() : new Date().toLocaleDateString()
}
}
export const transformListToFrontend = (backendList) => {
if (!Array.isArray(backendList)) return []
return backendList.map(transformToFrontendFormat)
}
export default {
getScriptList,
getScriptPage,
getScriptById,
createScript,
updateScript,
selectScript,
deleteScript,
transformToFrontendFormat,
transformListToFrontend
}
+112
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
/**
* 生命事件服务
* 处理生命事件的增删改查
*/
import { get, post, put, del } from './request.js'
export const getEventList = async () => {
const response = await get('/lifeEvent/list')
return response
}
export const getEventPage = async ({ pageNum = 1, pageSize = 10 }) => {
const response = await get('/lifeEvent/page', { pageNum, pageSize })
return response
}
export const getEventById = async (id) => {
const response = await get('/lifeEvent/detail', { id })
return response
}
export const createEvent = async (eventData) => {
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(eventData)
const response = await post('/lifeEvent/create', requestData)
return response
}
export const updateEvent = async (eventData) => {
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(eventData)
const response = await put('/lifeEvent/update', requestData)
return response
}
export const deleteEvent = async (id) => {
const response = await del('/lifeEvent/delete', { id })
return response
}
const transformToBackendFormat = (frontendData) => {
const {
id,
title,
time,
content,
aiFeedback,
eventType = 'daily_log',
emotionType,
emotionScore,
tags
} = frontendData
return {
id,
title,
eventDate: time,
content,
aiReply: aiFeedback,
eventType,
emotionType,
emotionScore,
tags
}
}
export const transformToFrontendFormat = (backendData) => {
if (!backendData) return null
const {
id,
userId,
title,
eventDate,
content,
aiReply,
eventType,
emotionType,
emotionScore,
tags,
createTime
} = backendData
return {
id,
userId,
title: title || '',
time: eventDate ? eventDate.split('T')[0] : '',
content: content || '',
aiFeedback: aiReply || '',
eventType: eventType || 'daily_log',
emotionType,
emotionScore,
tags: tags || [],
createTime
}
}
export const transformListToFrontend = (backendList) => {
if (!Array.isArray(backendList)) return []
return backendList.map(transformToFrontendFormat)
}
export default {
getEventList,
getEventPage,
getEventById,
createEvent,
updateEvent,
deleteEvent,
transformToFrontendFormat,
transformListToFrontend
}
+148
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,148 @@
/**
* 实现路径服务
* 处理路径的增删改查
*/
import { get, post, put, del } from './request.js'
export const getPathList = async () => {
const response = await get('/lifePath/listAll')
return response
}
export const getPathPage = async ({ pageNum = 1, pageSize = 10 }) => {
const response = await get('/lifePath/page', { pageNum, pageSize })
return response
}
export const getPathByScriptId = async (scriptId) => {
const response = await get('/lifePath/byScript', { scriptId })
return response
}
export const getPathById = async (id) => {
const response = await get('/lifePath/detail', { id })
return response
}
export const createPath = async (pathData) => {
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(pathData)
const response = await post('/lifePath/create', requestData)
return response
}
export const updatePath = async (pathData) => {
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(pathData)
const response = await put('/lifePath/update', requestData)
return response
}
export const deletePath = async (id) => {
const response = await del('/lifePath/delete', { id })
return response
}
const transformToBackendFormat = (frontendData) => {
const {
id,
scriptId,
title,
description,
content,
status = 'active',
progress = 0
} = frontendData
let steps = []
if (content) {
const stepMatches = content.match(/(\d+)\.\s*([^:]+)[:]\s*([^\n]+)/g)
if (stepMatches) {
steps = stepMatches.map((match, index) => {
const parts = match.match(/(\d+)\.\s*([^:]+)[:]\s*(.+)/)
return {
phase: `阶段${index + 1}`,
time: parts?.[2]?.trim() || '',
content: parts?.[3]?.trim() || match,
action: '',
resources: '',
habit: ''
}
})
} else {
const lines = content.split('\n').filter(line => line.trim())
steps = lines.map((line, index) => ({
phase: `阶段${index + 1}`,
time: '',
content: line.trim(),
action: '',
resources: '',
habit: ''
}))
}
}
return {
id,
scriptId,
title: title || '实现路径',
description,
steps,
status,
progress
}
}
export const transformToFrontendFormat = (backendData) => {
if (!backendData) return null
const {
id,
userId,
scriptId,
title,
description,
steps,
status,
progress,
createTime
} = backendData
let content = ''
if (Array.isArray(steps) && steps.length > 0) {
content = steps.map((step, index) => {
const phase = step.phase || `阶段${index + 1}`
const time = step.time ? `${step.time}` : ''
return `${index + 1}. ${phase}${time}${step.content || ''}`
}).join('\n')
}
return {
id,
userId,
scriptId,
title: title || '实现路径',
description: description || '',
content,
steps: steps || [],
status: status || 'active',
progress: progress || 0,
createTime
}
}
export const transformListToFrontend = (backendList) => {
if (!Array.isArray(backendList)) return []
return backendList.map(transformToFrontendFormat)
}
export default {
getPathList,
getPathPage,
getPathByScriptId,
getPathById,
createPath,
updatePath,
deletePath,
transformToFrontendFormat,
transformListToFrontend
}
+103
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,103 @@
import { getEnvValue, isDev } from '../config/env.js'
const API_BASE_URL = getEnvValue('API_BASE_URL')
/**
* 请求拦截处理
* 自动添加token到请求头
*/
const getHeaders = () => {
const token = uni.getStorageSync('access_token')
const headers = {
'Content-Type': 'application/json'
}
if (token) {
headers.Authorization = `Bearer ${token}`
}
return headers
}
/**
* 统一请求方法
* @param {Object} options - 请求配置
* @returns {Promise} 请求Promise
*/
const request = (options) => {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
uni.request({
url: `${API_BASE_URL}${options.url}`,
method: options.method || 'GET',
data: options.data,
header: getHeaders(),
timeout: 30000,
success: (res) => {
const { data, statusCode } = res
// 处理401未授权
if (statusCode === 401) {
uni.removeStorageSync('access_token')
uni.removeStorageSync('refresh_token')
uni.redirectTo({ url: '/pages/login/index' })
reject(new Error('登录已过期,请重新登录'))
return
}
// 后端返回格式: { code, message, data }
if (data.code === 200 || data.code === 0) {
resolve(data)
} else {
reject(new Error(data.message || '请求失败'))
}
},
fail: (err) => {
reject(new Error(err.errMsg || '网络错误'))
}
})
})
}
/**
* GET请求
*/
export const get = (url, params = {}) => {
// 构建查询字符串
const queryString = Object.keys(params)
.map(key => `${encodeURIComponent(key)}=${encodeURIComponent(params[key])}`)
.join('&')
const fullUrl = queryString ? `${url}?${queryString}` : url
return request({ url: fullUrl, method: 'GET' })
}
/**
* POST请求
*/
export const post = (url, data = {}) => {
return request({ url, method: 'POST', data })
}
/**
* PUT请求
*/
export const put = (url, data = {}) => {
return request({ url, method: 'PUT', data })
}
/**
* DELETE请求
*/
export const del = (url, params = {}) => {
const queryString = Object.keys(params)
.map(key => `${encodeURIComponent(key)}=${encodeURIComponent(params[key])}`)
.join('&')
const fullUrl = queryString ? `${url}?${queryString}` : url
return request({ url: fullUrl, method: 'DELETE' })
}
export default {
get,
post,
put,
del
}
+151
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
/**
* 用户档案服务
* 处理用户档案的增删改查
* 与Web端(life-script/src/services/userProfile.js)保持一致
*/
import { get, post, put } from './request.js'
/**
* 获取当前用户档案
* @returns {Promise<Object|null>} 用户档案
*/
export const getCurrentProfile = async () => {
const response = await get('/user-profile/me')
return response
}
/**
* 创建用户档案
* @param {Object} profileData - 档案数据
* @returns {Promise<Object>} 创建的档案
*/
export const createProfile = async (profileData) => {
// 转换前端数据格式为后端格式
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(profileData)
const response = await post('/user-profile/create', requestData)
return response
}
/**
* 更新用户档案
* @param {Object} profileData - 档案数据(必须包含id)
* @returns {Promise<Object>} 更新后的档案
*/
export const updateProfile = async (profileData) => {
const requestData = transformToBackendFormat(profileData)
const response = await put('/user-profile/update', requestData)
return response
}
/**
* 将前端数据格式转换为后端格式
* @param {Object} frontendData - 前端数据
* @returns {Object} 后端格式数据
*/
const transformToBackendFormat = (frontendData) => {
const {
id,
nickname,
gender,
zodiac,
profession,
mbti,
hobbies,
childhood,
joy,
low,
future
} = frontendData
return {
id,
nickname,
gender,
zodiac,
profession,
mbti,
// 兴趣爱好转为JSON字符串
hobbies: Array.isArray(hobbies) ? JSON.stringify(hobbies) : hobbies,
// 童年经历
childhoodDate: childhood?.date || null,
childhoodContent: childhood?.text || null,
// 高光时刻(对应前端的joy
peakDate: joy?.date || null,
peakContent: joy?.text || null,
// 低谷时期(对应前端的low
valleyDate: low?.date || null,
valleyContent: low?.text || null,
// 未来期许
futureVision: future?.vision || null,
// 理想生活状态
idealLife: future?.ideal || null
}
}
/**
* 将后端数据格式转换为前端格式
* @param {Object} backendData - 后端数据
* @returns {Object} 前端格式数据
*/
export const transformToFrontendFormat = (backendData) => {
if (!backendData) return null
const {
id,
userId,
nickname,
gender,
zodiac,
profession,
mbti,
hobbies,
childhoodDate,
childhoodContent,
peakDate,
peakContent,
valleyDate,
valleyContent,
futureVision,
idealLife
} = backendData
return {
id,
userId,
nickname: nickname || '',
gender: gender || '',
zodiac: zodiac || '',
profession: profession || '',
mbti: mbti || '',
// 兴趣爱好从JSON字符串解析
hobbies: hobbies ? (typeof hobbies === 'string' ? JSON.parse(hobbies) : hobbies) : [],
// 童年经历
childhood: {
date: childhoodDate || '',
text: childhoodContent || ''
},
// 高光时刻
joy: {
date: peakDate || '',
text: peakContent || ''
},
// 低谷时期
low: {
date: valleyDate || '',
text: valleyContent || ''
},
// 未来期许
future: {
vision: futureVision || '',
ideal: idealLife || ''
}
}
}
export default {
getCurrentProfile,
createProfile,
updateProfile,
transformToFrontendFormat
}

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 693 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 693 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.2 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 941 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 941 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.5 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.5 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.3 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.3 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 966 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 966 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.0 MiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.0 MiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 195 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 195 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 675 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 675 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 959 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 959 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.1 MiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.1 MiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 47 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 47 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 12 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 12 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 670 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 670 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 79 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 79 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 727 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 727 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 758 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 758 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.2 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 887 B

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 887 B

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.4 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 2.4 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.2 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 1.2 KiB

Before

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 7.5 KiB

After

Width:  |  Height:  |  Size: 7.5 KiB

Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff Show More